Special Operations Leaders Outline Budget Concerns

WASHINGTON, Sept. 22, 2011 — Suc­cess in spe­cial oper­a­tions mis­sions rests, in part, on crit­i­cal enabling capa­bil­i­ties the Army, Navy and Air Force pro­vide, the nation’s civil­ian and mil­i­tary spe­cial oper­a­tions chiefs told Con­gress today.

Michael D. Lump­kin, act­ing assis­tant sec­re­tary of defense for spe­cial oper­a­tions and low-inten­si­ty con­flict, and Navy Adm. William H. McRaven, com­man­der of U.S. Spe­cial Oper­a­tions Com­mand, dis­cussed future spe­cial oper­a­tions needs in tes­ti­mo­ny before the House Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee.

“As we enter an era of con­strained defense bud­gets, we must not repeat the mis­takes that led to degrad­ed [spe­cial oper­a­tions forces] capa­bil­i­ties through­out the 1970s,” Lump­kin said.

Lump­kin quot­ed five “SOF truths” drawn from a 1987 report writ­ten for the com­mit­tee: humans are more impor­tant than hard­ware, qual­i­ty is bet­ter than quan­ti­ty, spe­cial oper­a­tions forces can­not be mass pro­duced, com­pe­tent spe­cial oper­a­tions forces can­not be cre­at­ed after emer­gen­cies occur, and most spe­cial oper­a­tions require non-SOF assis­tance.

“Our expe­ri­ences have val­i­dat­ed [these] truths,” he said.

It has tak­en a decade to “grow” spe­cial oper­a­tions capa­bil­i­ties from 33,000 to near­ly 58,000 ser­vice mem­bers, Lump­kin not­ed, and the need for enabling, reg­u­lar forces has been com­men­su­rate.

“We know that the team approach in [the Depart­ment of Defense], the inter­a­gency, and with inter­na­tion­al part­ners car­ries the day,” he said.

After the ongo­ing trans­fer of secu­ri­ty lead in Afghanistan is com­plete in 2014, an esti­mat­ed 10,000 to 12,000 SOF troops still will be deployed, Lump­kin said.

As DOD con­ducts a strat­e­gy-based spend­ing review to pre­pare for a range of pos­si­ble future bud­get cuts, he said, “The key that we’re real­ly look­ing at [is] … as the ser­vices look at reduc­tions that may impact them, they have a direct impact on us.”

SOF draws its mem­bers from the reg­u­lar forces and so relies on them as a tal­ent pool, Lump­kin said, and spe­cial oper­a­tors also depend on sup­port from reg­u­lar forces to com­plete their mis­sions.

“While we do have the need for organ­ic com­bat sup­port and com­bat ser­vice sup­port, we do rely heav­i­ly on the gen­er­al-pur­pose forces,” he said. “So we’re look­ing very close­ly to see what the bud­get impacts [will be] on them, which will, in turn, influ­ence and impact us.“�

McRaven echoed Lumpkin’s sen­ti­ments, say­ing, “I think with­in [DOD], they under­stand the val­ue that SOF brings to the cur­rent fight and the future fight. Our real con­cern … is the impact on the ser­vices. As the ser­vices have to poten­tial­ly cut key enablers, that’s going to affect us.“�

Socom is one of DOD’s nine uni­fied com­bat­ant com­mands, but with some unique respon­si­bil­i­ties, McRaven not­ed.

Socom trains and equips its forces, but also syn­chro­nizes plan­ning for glob­al oper­a­tions against ter­ror­ist net­works, coor­di­nat­ing with the Office of the Sec­re­tary of Defense, the Joint Staff, the geo­graph­ic com­bat­ant com­mands and appro­pri­ate gov­ern­ment agen­cies, the admi­ral said.

“These author­i­ties have effec­tive­ly pre­pared and equipped our force to meet the demands of the last decade, and to be pos­tured appro­pri­ate­ly for future chal­lenges,” he added.

Socom pro­vides “rapid, glob­al options to meet a broad set of com­plex and dynam­ic chal­lenges,” the admi­ral said.

SOF has dou­bled its forces, tripled its bud­get and met a quadru­pled mis­sion demand over the last ten years, he said.

“With an annu­al bud­get of $10.5 bil­lion, U.S. SOCOM com­pris­es only 1.6 per­cent of the Depart­ment of Defense-pro­posed FY12 bud­get, and put sim­ply, pro­vides a tremen­dous return on the nation’s invest­ment,” McRaven said.

All spe­cial oper­a­tors are trained to per­form both direct and indi­rect roles, he said.

McRaven defined direct action as “pre­ci­sion, high­ly kinet­ic strike force” mis­sions. Indi­rect oper­a­tions focused on advis­ing, train­ing and assist­ing oth­er nations’ forces, he added.

The two approach­es are mutu­al­ly sup­port­ive, the admi­ral said, with the strike capa­bil­i­ty pro­vid­ing space and time for indi­rect efforts to work.

McRaven said his two pri­or­i­ties as Socom com­man­der are first, to win the cur­rent fight and main­tain the health of the force; and sec­ond, to expand SOF’s capa­bil­i­ties by work­ing with the com­bat­ant com­mands and inter­a­gency and allied spe­cial oper­a­tions part­ners to estab­lish a glob­al SOF net­work able to react more rapid­ly and effec­tive­ly to ene­my action.�

“I believe spe­cial oper­a­tions forces have nev­er been more valu­able to our nation and to our allies,” he said. “You have my promise that we will con­tin­ue to fight as long and as hard as you need us to in order to pro­tect this great nation and the prin­ci­ples we hold so dear.”

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →