Rodriguez: Afghans Rise Above Taliban’s Desperation

WASHINGTON, June 2, 2011 — Sen­sa­tion­al, high-vis­i­bil­i­ty attacks on Afghan gov­ern­ment offi­cials and secu­ri­ty forces rep­re­sent a des­per­ate ene­my strat­e­gy to intim­i­date the Afghan peo­ple and shake the trust and con­fi­dence they are devel­op­ing for their lead­ers and insti­tu­tions, a top com­man­der in Afghanistan said today.

Army Lt. Gen. David M. Rodriguez, com­man­der of the Inter­na­tion­al Secu­ri­ty Assis­tance Force Joint Com­mand and deputy com­man­der of U.S. Forces Afghanistan, told a Cen­ter for a New Amer­i­can Secu­ri­ty forum he expects this spate of attacks to continue. 

“The Tal­iban can­not expect to regain ter­ri­to­ry,” he said via video­con­fer­ence from Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Wash., where he is help­ing to train the Army’s 1st Corps lead­er­ship and Euro­pean Reac­tion Corps for their upcom­ing deploy­ment to Afghanistan. 

“So right now they are attempt­ing to degrade the trust the coali­tion and Afghans have in each oth­er through insid­er attacks, as well as to intim­i­date the peo­ple in hopes of mak­ing them believe that their gov­ern­ment can­not pro­tect them,” he said. 

“But so far, the part­ner­ship remains strong,” Rodriguez con­tin­ued. “And in many places, the peo­ple aren’t buy­ing the fact that the gov­ern­ment can­not pro­tect them.” One of the best indi­ca­tions, he said, is how quick­ly peo­ple return to nor­mal dai­ly activ­i­ties after each attack. 

Rodriguez report­ed that the death of Osama bin Laden has had no impact on the ground in Afghanistan and empha­sized that the mis­sion remains the same: to deny al-Qai­da sanc­tu­ary and pre­vent the Tal­iban from retak­ing Afghanistan. 

“Our progress in achiev­ing our objec­tives and mak­ing Afghanistan a place inhos­pitable to ter­ror­ists is indis­putable,” he said. “But it remains frag­ile and reversible.” 

Rodriguez expressed con­fi­dence in the strat­e­gy designed to build on this progress that focus­es on “crit­i­cal ter­rain” with­in Afghanistan. This involves com­mit­ting most man­pow­er and oth­er resources to key pop­u­la­tion, eco­nom­ic and trans­porta­tion cen­ters he called par­tic­u­lar­ly crit­i­cal to Afghanistan’s long-term stability. 

“We are large­ly able to focus the major­i­ty of our coali­tion and inter­na­tion­al efforts where we need them and when we need them,” he said. “And when we do this, our resources are suf­fi­cient. And I can’t overem­pha­size what a big idea that has been to our effort.” 

Rodriguez laud­ed suc­cess­es in devel­op­ing Afghan secu­ri­ty forces — now num­ber­ing more than 284,000 — ahead of sched­ule. “There is no doubt they can and will fight,” he said. “And their oper­a­tional effec­tive­ness in destroy­ing the ene­my and pro­tect­ing their peo­ple grows daily.” 

The gen­er­al said he believes the goal of get­ting Afghan secu­ri­ty forces into the lead through­out Afghanistan by the end of 2014 is achiev­able. At the pla­toon and com­pa­ny lev­el, they’re “enor­mous­ly capa­ble of con­duct­ing oper­a­tions with lit­tle assis­tance,” he said. So the coali­tion focus is on build­ing head­quar­ters capac­i­ty, he explained, and even­tu­al­ly leav­ing in place “only the crit­i­cal enablers” such as med­ical evac­u­a­tion and access to joint effects and intel­li­gence, sur­veil­lance and recon­nais­sance assets. 

In the mean­time, Rodriguez said, he reg­u­lar­ly empha­sizes to his field com­man­ders the need to con­tin­u­al­ly chal­lenge their Afghan counterparts. 

“We have got to push our Afghan part­ners to start lead­ing more and more,” he said. “We have to start tak­ing more risks in this regard and hav­ing more trust in them.” 

Rodriguez expressed sim­i­lar con­fi­dence in Afghan lead­ers, who he said are increas­ing­ly step­ping up to lead their peo­ple, and the expan­sion of the government’s pres­ence across Afghanistan in a way that holds key ter­rain once it has been cleared. He under­scored the impor­tance of dis­trict gov­ern­ments, which he called the “first line of assis­tance for the vil­lagers” against what is essen­tial­ly a rur­al insurgency. 

Unlike in the past — where devel­op­ment was less tar­get­ed and often did­n’t result in secu­ri­ty gains, and the same ground had to be cleared over and over again — the “key ter­rain” con­struct helps to ensure gains made stick, he said. 

“Now we are much bet­ter off,” he said. “We spend the bulk of our mil­i­tary effort on degrad­ing or destroy­ing insur­gent infra­struc­ture, to include the lead­er­ship, but we also ensure that the plan­ning for local secu­ri­ty and good gov­er­nance begins ear­ly enough to be insert­ed and fol­low on as soon as the con­di­tions allow.” 

This plan, Rodriguez said, is based on recog­ni­tion that absent a sweep­ing polit­i­cal set­tle­ment, “the best chance of sta­bi­liz­ing Afghanistan is to mobi­lize the peo­ple to demand the ful­fill­ment of their mod­est requirements.” 

The Afghan peo­ple, their gov­ern­ment and their secu­ri­ty forces all work­ing togeth­er toward a com­mon pur­pose “will squeeze out enough of the ene­mies of the Afghan peo­ple to build suf­fi­cient sta­bil­i­ty for Afghanistan in the future,” the gen­er­al said. Except for a reli­able flow of fund­ing from the Afghan cap­i­tal of Kab­ul to fund oper­at­ing costs and pro­vide basic ser­vices, Rodriguez said, most of those require­ments must be ful­filled at the local levels. 

Rodriguez expressed hope that strat­e­gy under way will ensure suf­fi­cient secu­ri­ty across Afghanistan, but rec­og­nized that “oper­a­tional and tac­ti­cal suc­cess­es will take us only so far, giv­en the time con­straints we believe we will be under.” 

He laid out plans to build ever-expand­ing secu­ri­ty zones, par­tic­u­lar­ly in key areas to the south and east, through 2014. But by the end of that year, Rodriguez said, the secu­ri­ty pock­ets are expect­ed to extend to all the areas the Afghans and coali­tion believe will cre­ate the sta­bil­i­ty need­ed to sta­bi­lize the entire country. 

In the mean­time, Rodriguez cit­ed progress toward that goal, par­tic­u­lar­ly dur­ing last year’s focus in the Cen­tral Hel­mand Riv­er Val­ley, once the insurgency’s strong­hold, and in cur­rent oper­a­tions in Kan­da­har province. In addi­tion, Kab­ul, home to one-fifth of the pop­u­la­tion, is one of the safest regions of the country. 

Sim­i­lar gains are being real­ized in the east, but Rodriguez rec­og­nized that this area is expect­ed to be “the tough­est part of the tough neigh­bor­hood that will be Afghanistan for a long time.” 

Despite “tru­ly incred­i­ble” oper­a­tions under way in Region­al Com­mand East, with “pret­ty remark­able” results, “we have a way to go in the east,” he acknowl­edged. “And nowhere will the Afghan secu­ri­ty forces be chal­lenged more,” the gen­er­al added. 

Look­ing to the future, Rodriguez said his great­est con­cern is to pre­serve these gains as the Unit­ed States begins its draw­down in Afghanistan. 

“I am con­cerned about a draw­down that is not total­ly aligned with grow­ing Afghan capa­bil­i­ties, or is so rapid that the army and police make mis­takes or tem­porar­i­ly leave gaps that, while not crit­i­cal in and of them­selves, make the people’s shaky con­fi­dence waver and their sur­vival instincts rise to the fore­front,” he said. “If this hap­pens, the Tal­iban can regain their foothold among a fear­ful population.” 

Rodriguez also expressed con­cern about sup­port for the insur­gency that con­tin­ues to flow most­ly from the ungoverned areas of Pak­istan, as well as the parochial inter­ests of some of the for­mal and infor­mal lead­ers around Afghanistan. 

“This is unac­cept­able,” he said. “And the Afghans, togeth­er with the coali­tion, have to start address­ing these chal­lenges more effectively.” 

Stand­ing up to that chal­lenge requires what Rodriguez said has yet to be achieved: strik­ing the prop­er bal­ance between respect­ing Afghan sov­er­eign­ty and demand­ing that Afghanistan adheres to the non-nego­tiable respon­si­bil­i­ties that come with that sovereignty. 

This includes stop­ping lead­ers “who steal mon­ey, oppor­tu­ni­ty and respect from the Afghan cit­i­zens,” he said. It also requires demand­ing that the Afghan gov­ern­ment stop those for­mal and infor­mal pow­er bro­kers who are direct­ly harm­ing U.S. and Afghan forces, he added. 

Look­ing to the future and troop draw­down in Afghanistan, Rodriguez empha­sized that the coali­tion “will not chase transition.” 

“There is no faster way to dilute our efforts that we have worked so hard to focus on for the last sev­er­al years and undo all we have accom­plished [than] just to chase tran­si­tion,” he said. “We are going to … exe­cute a plan that the Afghans have devel­oped with us, and the nat­ur­al out­come of that will be transition.” 

Rodriguez called for a strate­gic agree­ment by 2014 that paves the way for the U.S.-Afghan rela­tion­ship from one of wartime expe­di­ent foot­ing to nor­mal­iza­tion. Doing so, he said, will offer assur­ances of long-term com­mit­ment, not just to the Afghan peo­ple, but also to the enemy. 

U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →