Readiness Must Be Key Amid Cuts, Vice Chiefs Warn

WASHINGTON, July 27, 2011 — Mil­i­tary readi­ness must remain para­mount as the mil­i­tary seeks ways to oper­ate in the face of loom­ing bud­get cuts, the ser­vices’ vice chiefs warned Con­gress yes­ter­day.

Tes­ti­fy­ing before the House Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee, the No. 2 offi­cers in the four mil­i­tary ser­vices said they know the days of abun­dant fund­ing are over.

We rec­og­nize we can­not expect to oper­ate the way we have over the past decade,” Gen. Peter W. Chiarel­li, Army vice chief of staff, told the pan­el. “We can­not expect the same lev­el of fund­ing and flex­i­bil­i­ty to con­tin­ue indef­i­nite­ly.”

So, as the ser­vices seek new effi­cien­cies and inno­v­a­tive ways of doing busi­ness, Chiarel­li empha­sized, “it is essen­tial that we make the nec­es­sary invest­ment to ensure a strong, capa­ble defense.”

That, the vice chiefs agreed, means pro­vid­ing the resources and man­pow­er to accom­plish what­ev­er mis­sions the mil­i­tary is called upon to ful­fill. It requires main­tain­ing appro­pri­ate force lev­els, replac­ing equip­ment worn out dur­ing a decade of con­flict and con­tin­u­ing to build capa­bil­i­ties for the future, they said.

Gen. Joseph F. Dun­ford, assis­tant Marine Corps com­man­dant, point­ed to short­falls in equip­ment readi­ness for Marines not serv­ing in the com­bat zones.

As we move beyond Afghanistan, we will need con­tin­ued sup­port to reset our equip­ment and restore the readi­ness of our units at home sta­tion,” he said. “We will also need sup­port in mod­ern­iz­ing our equip­ment as we seek to recon­sti­tute the Corps for tomorrow’s chal­lenges.”

Mean­while, the offi­cers agreed that acqui­si­tion pro­grams must con­tin­ue, gov­erned by pru­dent deci­sion-mak­ing, to ensure the future force’s capa­bil­i­ties.

Our future readi­ness depends first on main­tain­ing the right bal­ance between our cur­rent readi­ness require­ments and the pro­cure­ment of future plat­forms and capa­bil­i­ties,” said Adm. Jonathan W. Green­ert, vice chief of naval oper­a­tions.

Gen. Philip M. Breedlove, the Air Force’s vice chief of staff, not­ed that the Air Force is using the old­est fleet in its his­to­ry to sup­port cur­rent oper­a­tional demands. For exam­ple, he said, delays in the F‑35 joint strike fight­er pro­gram and decreased fund­ing for F‑22 Rap­tor mod­ern­iza­tion has put more reliance on the lega­cy fight­er fleet.

Extend­ing the ser­vice life of these and oth­er air­craft ulti­mate­ly adds new costs, Breedlove said, both in increased main­te­nance require­ments and mod­ern­iz­ing required for them to main­tain com­bat capa­bil­i­ty.

Green­ert stressed the impor­tance of ensur­ing cur­rent ships and air­craft are able to reach their expect­ed ser­vice life.

With­in our cur­rent top-line bud­get, that requires that we lim­it demand for Navy forces to a lev­el that is sus­tain­able with­in our planned force struc­ture over the long term,” he said.

Although high oper­a­tional demands over the past 10 years have tak­en a toll on mil­i­tary equip­ment and put heavy stress on the force, the vice chiefs said today’s mil­i­tary has a rock-sol­id foun­da­tion to face the future.

The Unit­ed States con­tin­ues to con­front a dynam­ic inter­na­tion­al envi­ron­ment requir­ing the mil­i­tary to remain strong and agile enough to face a diverse range of threats,” Breedlove said.

The Air Force remains a mis­sion-focused and high­ly pre­pared force, he said, work­ing with its joint part­ners to defend and advance U.S. inter­ests “by pro­vid­ing unique capa­bil­i­ties across the full spec­trum of oper­a­tions required to suc­ceed in today’s fight and future con­flicts.”

Chiarel­li told the House pan­el the Army is as good as it’s ever been. “Let me assure you up front, your Army remains the most capa­ble and deci­sive land force it in the world,” he said. “It is bet­ter trained and equipped, and our lead­ers are bet­ter pre­pared than at any oth­er time in his­to­ry.”

The Navy, Green­ert said, remains the most capa­ble mar­itime force in the world. “We will con­tin­ue to main­tain a for­ward-deployed pres­ence around the world to pre­vent con­flict, increase inter­op­er­abil­i­ty with our allies, enhance the mar­itime secu­ri­ty and capac­i­ty of our tra­di­tion­al and emerg­ing part­ners, con­front irreg­u­lar chal­lenges and respond to crises,” he said.

Like­wise, today’s Marines “are high­ly trained and com­bat proven across the range of mil­i­tary oper­a­tions,” Dun­ford said.

We can respond with prompt, deci­sive action to a wide range of chal­lenges,” and with that capa­bil­i­ty, “send a clear mes­sage to both our allies and poten­tial foes,” he added.

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →