Quran Incident Inquiry Results Forthcoming, ISAF Official Says

WASHINGTON, Feb. 22, 2012 — Coali­tion mem­bers are work­ing with Afghan lead­ers to quick­ly and ful­ly inves­ti­gate the “grave mis­take” that yes­ter­day end­ed in par­tial­ly burned Qurans at the Par­wan deten­tion facil­i­ty near Bagram, Afghanistan, an Inter­na­tion­al Secu­ri­ty Assis­tance Force spokesman said today.

Speak­ing from the Afghan cap­i­tal of Kab­ul in a tele­con­fer­ence with Pen­ta­gon reporters, Brig. Gen. Carsten Jacob­son of the Ger­man army said it’s of the utmost impor­tance that offi­cials “explain very, very clear­ly what hap­pened, explain how sor­ry we are about what hap­pened, explain that this was a mis­take, explain what led to it, and talk about the consequences.” 

Afghan gov­ern­ment and reli­gious lead­ers are inves­ti­gat­ing the cir­cum­stances behind the inci­dent along with ISAF rep­re­sen­ta­tives, Jacob­son said, and the results of that inquiry could be avail­able with­in hours. 

The inad­ver­tent des­e­cra­tion of the Islam­ic holy book kin­dled protest demon­stra­tions that began with a 2,000-person dis­tur­bance out­side the deten­tion facil­i­ty yes­ter­day, and con­tin­ued today with at least four more protests, fea­tur­ing 200 to 500 demon­stra­tors each, around Kab­ul, Jacob­son said. News reports count the death toll from the protests at sev­en, though Jacob­son said no vio­lence has been specif­i­cal­ly direct­ed against ISAF troops. 

Jacob­son said the Qurans were mis­tak­en­ly includ­ed in a mass of mate­r­i­al deliv­ered to the deten­tion facility’s burn pit for rou­tine dis­pos­al. Local work­ers at the facil­i­ty noticed the books and pulled them from the fire, he added. 

“Mate­r­i­al was inad­ver­tent­ly giv­en to troops for burn­ing,” Jacob­son said. “The deci­sion to burn this mate­r­i­al had noth­ing to do with it being reli­gious in nature or relat­ed to Islam. It was a mis­take. It was an error.” 

Marine Corps Gen. John R. Allen, ISAF com­man­der, quick­ly ordered an inves­ti­ga­tion to dis­cov­er how and why the mis­take hap­pened, the spokesman said. 

ISAF has com­plete respect for Islam and the rev­er­ence in which the Quran is held,” Jacob­son said. “We are very seri­ous about mak­ing cer­tain … that if some­one failed to fol­low our rules, they will be held accountable.” 

All 50 coali­tion mem­ber nations require their troops to take part in cul­tur­al train­ing before and after deploy­ing to Afghanistan, he not­ed. While such train­ing has been effec­tive over­all, the spokesman said, Allen ordered yes­ter­day that all coali­tion forces in Afghanistan will com­plete train­ing in the prop­er han­dling of reli­gious mate­r­i­al no lat­er than March 3. 

“The train­ing will include the iden­ti­fi­ca­tion of reli­gious mate­ri­als, their sig­nif­i­cance, cor­rect han­dling and stor­age,” Jacob­son said. 

Defense Sec­re­tary Leon E. Panet­ta and Allen each issued state­ments yes­ter­day apol­o­giz­ing for the event. 

Jacob­son repeat­ed those sen­ti­ments today. 

“Gen­er­al Allen and ISAF, again, give sin­cere apolo­gies for any offense that this may have caused to the pres­i­dent of Afghanistan, the gov­ern­ment of the Islam­ic Repub­lic of Afghanistan and, most impor­tant­ly, to the noble peo­ple of Afghanistan,” he said. 

Jacob­son said he can’t con­firm news reports that the Qurans may have con­tained writ­ing by detainees using the books as a means of com­mu­ni­ca­tion with each oth­er. “We haven’t got any proof of that yet, and that is a vital part of the inves­ti­ga­tion that is ongo­ing,” he said. 

All mate­r­i­al recov­ered at the burn pit was turned over to Islam­ic author­i­ties, he not­ed, reit­er­at­ing that Afghan offi­cials are tak­ing part in the inves­ti­ga­tion. Find­ings from that inquiry should deter­mine exact­ly what mate­r­i­al was involved, who gave the orders to dis­pose of it, how it got to the burn pit, and what actu­al­ly hap­pened when it got there, Jacob­son said. 

“We have to be very care­ful in what we do, what we say, what we look at,” he added. “This is a very sen­si­tive sub­ject, and we have to be exact­ly clear on what was found, what was the rea­son for deci­sions that were tak­en, and it has to be done togeth­er with the Afghans.” 

U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefence.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →