Petraeus: Afghan Transition Will Have Long-term Impact

WASHINGTON, March 16, 2011 — As the tran­si­tion approach­es for Afghan forces to begin tak­ing respon­si­bil­i­ty for secu­ri­ty in their coun­try, actions in the com­ing months will have con­se­quences for years to come, the com­man­der of NATO and U.S. forces in Afghanistan said here today.
Army Gen. David H. Petraeus told the House Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee that each step in the process — set to cul­mi­nate with Afghan forces hav­ing the secu­ri­ty lead through­out the coun­try by the end of 2014 — must be close­ly coor­di­nat­ed and irrev­o­ca­ble.

“We’ll get one shot at tran­si­tion, and we need to get it right,” he said.

The coali­tion has increased its efforts to enable the Afghan government’s work to improve gov­er­nance, eco­nom­ic devel­op­ment and the pro­vi­sion of basic ser­vices, Petraeus said. “These are essen­tial ele­ments of the effort to shift deliv­ery of basic ser­vices from provin­cial recon­struc­tion teams and inter­na­tion­al orga­ni­za­tions to Afghan gov­ern­ment ele­ments,” he explained.

Afghan-led rein­te­gra­tion of rec­on­cil­able insur­gents must be an impor­tant ele­ment of the strat­e­gy, Petraeus said, not­ing that the NATO-led Inter­na­tion­al Secu­ri­ty Assis­tance Force is assist­ing Afghan gov­ern­ment ini­tia­tives, includ­ing the recent­ly estab­lished Afghan high peace coun­cil and provin­cial rein­te­gra­tion coun­cils.

“Indeed, we rec­og­nize that we and our Afghan part­ners can­not just kill or cap­ture our way out of the insur­gency in Afghanistan,” the gen­er­al said. “In fact, some 700 for­mer Tal­iban have now offi­cial­ly rein­te­grat­ed with Afghan author­i­ties, and some 2,000 more are in var­i­ous stages of the rein­te­gra­tion process.”

All of these efforts are part of a com­pre­hen­sive civ­il-mil­i­tary approach, he explained, in which ISAF coor­di­nates with inter­na­tion­al orga­ni­za­tions, diplo­mat­ic mis­sions in Afghanistan, and the Afghan gov­ern­ment and secu­ri­ty forces.

“We have also sought to ensure that we min­i­mize loss of inno­cent civil­ian life in the course of our oper­a­tions,” he added.

A recent Unit­ed Nations study found that civil­ian casu­al­ties result­ing from ISAF actions decreased by more than 20 per­cent in 2010, though the num­ber of coali­tion forces increased by more than 100,000, Petraeus not­ed. But despite the reduc­tion in civil­ian casu­al­ties, he said, sev­er­al trag­ic inci­dents in recent weeks prompt­ed him to order a review of use of force at all lev­els of ISAF and among attack heli­copter air crews.

“I also reem­pha­sized instruc­tions on reduc­ing dam­age to infra­struc­ture and prop­er­ty to an absolute min­i­mum,” he said. “Coun­terin­sur­gents can­not suc­ceed if they harm the peo­ple they are striv­ing to pro­tect.”

Afghan Pres­i­dent Hamid Karzai will announce next week the first loca­tions where secu­ri­ty respon­si­bil­i­ty will tran­si­tion to Afghan lead, Petraeus said. In keep­ing with the prin­ci­ples adopt­ed by NATO’s North Atlantic Coun­cil, he added, the pace of tran­si­tion will be deter­mined by con­di­tions on the ground.

“Accord­ing to the NATO prin­ci­ples, tran­si­tion will see our forces thin­ning out, not just hand­ing off,” he said, telling the law­mak­ers that some forces freed up by tran­si­tion will be reas­signed to oth­er loca­tions in Afghanistan or to train­ing Afghan army and police forces.

“Sim­i­lar process­es are also tak­ing place as we com­mence tran­si­tion of cer­tain train­ing and insti­tu­tion­al func­tions from ISAF train­ers to their Afghan coun­ter­parts,” he said.

As the secu­ri­ty tran­si­tion unfolds, he said, ISAF must focus not just on the year ahead, but on the goal of full secu­ri­ty respon­si­bil­i­ty trans­fer by the end of 2014.

“Indeed, we need to ensure that we take a suf­fi­cient­ly long view … [and] that our actions in the months ahead enable long-term achieve­ment in the years ahead,” Petraeus said. ISAF has refined its cam­paign plan to do just that, and has begun to look beyond 2014 to estab­lish­ing U.S. and NATO strate­gic part­ner­ships with Afghanistan, he said.

“All of this is enor­mous­ly reas­sur­ing to our Afghan part­ners, and of con­sid­er­able con­cern to the Tal­iban,” he said. An endur­ing com­mit­ment by the inter­na­tion­al com­mu­ni­ty to Afghanistan, he added, is impor­tant to insur­gents’ recog­ni­tion that rec­on­cil­i­a­tion, rather than con­tin­ued fight­ing, should be their goal.

Petraeus said four fund­ing issues are key to sus­tain­ing progress in Afghanistan.

“I am con­cerned that lev­els of fund­ing for our State Depart­ment and [U.S. Agency for Inter­na­tion­al Devel­op­ment] part­ners will not suf­fi­cient­ly enable them to build on the hard-fought secu­ri­ty achieve­ments of our men and women in uni­form,” he said, adding that inad­e­quate fund­ing for civil­ian efforts in Afghanistan could jeop­ar­dize the over­all mis­sion.

“I offer that assess­ment not­ing we have just com­plet­ed a joint civ­il-mil­i­tary cam­paign plan between U.S. Forces Afghanistan and the U.S. embassy.”

Sec­ond, Petraeus said, he deeply appre­ci­ates fund­ing for addi­tion­al capa­bil­i­ties such as sur­veil­lance assets and all-ter­rain mine-resis­tant, ambush-pro­tect­ed vehi­cles for coali­tion forces. Com­man­ders Emer­gency Response Pro­gram and rein­te­gra­tion pro­gram fund­ing have like­wise been instru­men­tal to the over­all coun­terin­sur­gency effort, he said.

Third, the World Bank and the Asian Devel­op­ment Bank, he said, are the largest donors to Afghanistan after the Unit­ed States, and have been crit­i­cal to con­struc­tion of the Ring Road and the Uzbek-Afghan rail­road.

“We need these crit­i­cal enabling insti­tu­tions, and fur­ther U.S. sup­port for them will ensure that they’re able to con­tin­ue to con­tribute as sig­nif­i­cant­ly as they have in the past,” he said.

Final­ly, fund­ing for devel­op­ment of Afghan secu­ri­ty forces and their result­ing gains in quan­ti­ty, qual­i­ty and capa­bil­i­ty is “essen­tial to the process of tran­si­tion,” Petraeus said. “Our objec­tives in Afghanistan and in the region are of vital impor­tance,” he said. “We will con­tin­ue to make adjust­ments, in close con­sul­ta­tion with our Afghan and inter­na­tion­al coun­ter­parts, as the sit­u­a­tion evolves.”

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twit­ter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →