Pentagon Strategy Addresses Energy Challenges

WASHINGTON, July 20, 2011 — Reduc­ing demand, find­ing alter­na­tive ener­gy sources and improv­ing the ener­gy secu­ri­ty of mil­i­tary oper­a­tions are among the goals of the Defense Department’s oper­a­tional ener­gy strat­e­gy, a senior Pen­ta­gon offi­cial said here yes­ter­day.

Sharon E. Burke, assis­tant sec­re­tary of defense for oper­a­tional ener­gy plans and pro­grams, described the strat­e­gy dur­ing an Army and Air Force ener­gy forum.

[The strat­e­gy is] going to guide the entire depart­ment in how we use ener­gy for mil­i­tary oper­a­tions,” Burke said. “It’s the frame­work for mov­ing for­ward with our ener­gy chal­lenges.” Defense Sec­re­tary Leon E. Panet­ta has warned of a chang­ing secu­ri­ty envi­ron­ment and its effects on oper­a­tional ener­gy demand, she not­ed.

Improv­ing our ener­gies could not only improve our mil­i­tary effec­tive­ness and our abil­i­ty to oper­ate in the world, but it is also impor­tant to our readi­ness,” Burke said. “Sec­re­tary Panet­ta, in his short time in office, has already cau­tioned us all that we need to have humil­i­ty in pre­dict­ing the shape or direc­tion of future con­flicts. … So ener­gy is a part of that chang­ing secu­ri­ty envi­ron­ment, but it’s also part of that adap­ta­tion, and how we bet­ter pre­pare for this chang­ing world and the pos­si­bil­i­ty of strate­gic sur­prise.”

Burke told the audi­ence that chang­ing the way the Defense Depart­ment uses ener­gy at home and abroad is strate­gi­cal­ly sig­nif­i­cant.

In today’s oper­a­tions, we haul fuel and oth­er sup­plies across very chal­leng­ing cir­cum­stances in Afghanistan, across dif­fi­cult ter­rain and dan­ger­ous roads,” she said. “At home, our crit­i­cal infra­struc­ture, which sus­tains mil­i­tary oper­a­tions abroad, depends on the civil­ian elec­tric grid. … The more that we can light­en that depen­dence — whether on the grid, or [by] our sol­diers, sailors, air­men and Marines over­seas — the more resilient we are to that chang­ing strate­gic land­scape.”

Burke also empha­sized the need for a respon­si­ble reduc­tion in gov­ern­ment spend­ing, and the role the Defense Department’s oper­a­tional ener­gy strat­e­gy plays in that effort.

Man­ag­ing our mil­i­tary under these cir­cum­stances will be a chal­lenge for all defense pol­i­cy mak­ers,” she con­tin­ued, “and our chal­lenge is to adjust to our fis­cal cir­cum­stances and sus­tain our mil­i­tary effec­tive­ness today and far into the future.”

Bud­get con­sid­er­a­tions should not dic­tate strate­gic pri­or­i­ties, Burke said. “But we will need to be real­is­tic with how we exe­cute that strat­e­gy with few­er resources,” she added.
That’s where the oper­a­tional ener­gy strat­e­gy unveiled last month by Deputy Defense Sec­re­tary William J. Lynn III has an espe­cial­ly impor­tant role, Burke said.

For exam­ple, she said, an exper­i­men­tal site on Fort Devens, Mass., is test­ing a camp kit that incor­po­rates advances in pow­er gen­er­a­tion and dis­tri­b­u­tion, inso­lat­ed shel­ters, water re-use sys­tems and waste man­age­ment.

In addi­tion, Burke said, the Air Force’s Air Mobil­i­ty Com­mand is mak­ing inno­v­a­tive process changes rang­ing from reduc­ing air­craft weight to more effi­cient rout­ing, to bet­ter car­go load­ing. “That’s expect­ed to save over a half-bil­lion dol­lars over the next five years,” she added.

These pro­grams are tests, [but] we have more to do,” Burke said. “We need oper­a­tional ener­gy incor­po­rat­ed into our readi­ness train­ing, but this is real­ly impor­tant to be able to take this out to the field and show that it can work. And that it can give us bet­ter mil­i­tary effec­tive­ness on the ground with our sol­diers.

And the ser­vices aren’t wait­ing to do this — they’re doing [it],” she added.

The strat­e­gy will not end or fade away with the return of U.S. troops from Iraq and Afghanistan, Burke said.

This is, fun­da­men­tal­ly, a readi­ness chal­lenge,” she said. “We always need to be ready to con­duct mis­sions wher­ev­er we are, and that means we have to be ready whether we have forces in the field or not. If we’re suc­cess­ful at look­ing at it that way, … we’ll have a mil­i­tary that’s bet­ter able to respond to any chal­lenge or any threat any­where in the world.”

Ulti­mate­ly, Burke said, she hopes the changes brought forth by the new oper­a­tional ener­gy strat­e­gy will improve the nation’s over­all ener­gy readi­ness.

I sin­cere­ly hope that in improv­ing the ener­gy secu­ri­ty and ener­gy readi­ness of our armed forces, that the depart­ment will have made a larg­er con­tri­bu­tion to the ener­gy secu­ri­ty of the whole nation,” she said. “I think [this new strat­e­gy is] the way we’re going to do it.”

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →