Panetta Tells Senators Sequestration Would Devastate DOD

WASHINGTON, Nov. 15, 2011 — If the Joint Select Com­mit­tee on Deficit Reduc­tion can­not reach an agree­ment, the results would be dev­as­tat­ing for the Defense Depart­ment, Defense Sec­re­tary Leon E. Panet­ta wrote in a let­ter to two sen­a­tors yes­ter­day.

The so-called super­com­mit­tee must reach agree­ment on debt reduc­tion by Nov. 23. If they can­not do so, the Bud­get Con­trol Act calls for “seques­tra­tion,” with the Pen­ta­gon bud­get absorb­ing most of the cuts. 

DOD already is cut­ting $450 bil­lion over the next 10 years, Panet­ta wrote to Ari­zona Sen. John McCain and South Car­oli­na Sen. Lind­sey Graham. 

“These cuts are dif­fi­cult and will require us to take some risks, but they are man­age­able,” Panet­ta wrote. “If the max­i­mum seques­tra­tion is trig­gered, the total cut will rise to about $1 tril­lion com­pared with the fis­cal year 2012 plan.” 

If trig­gered, seques­tra­tion would begin in Jan­u­ary 2013, Panet­ta wrote, not­ing it would add $500 bil­lion to $600 bil­lion to already-planned cuts. The fis­cal 2013 bud­get would be cut by $100 bil­lion. While mil­i­tary per­son­nel prob­a­bly would be exempt­ed, the sec­re­tary added, the rest of the cuts would come from oth­er parts of the DOD bud­get, and no major weapon pro­gram would be exempt. 

The depart­ment, Panet­ta wrote, could not exempt all civil­ian employees. 

“Fur­loughs — per­haps a month or more [in length] — might well be need­ed because there would not be time to reduce per­son­nel lev­els to achieve sav­ings,” accord­ing to an enclo­sure Panet­ta sent to the senators. 

Seques­tra­tion, the sec­re­tary wrote, would tie DOD’s hands and cut 23 per­cent equal­ly to each major invest­ment and con­struc­tion program. 

“Such a large cut, applied in such an indis­crim­i­nate man­ner, would ren­der most of our ship and con­struc­tion projects ‘unex­e­cutable’ — you can­not buy three quar­ters of a ship or a build­ing — and seri­ous­ly dam­age our mod­ern­iza­tion efforts,” Panet­ta wrote. 

The sit­u­a­tion does not improve in the out years, the sec­re­tary wrote, not­ing it would mean a reduc­tion of $100 mil­lion each year. After 10 years of cuts, he con­tin­ued, the U.S. mil­i­tary “would have the small­est ground force since 1940, the small­est num­ber of ships since 1915 and the small­est Air Force in its history.” 

“We would also be forced to ter­mi­nate most large pro­cure­ment pro­grams in order to accom­mo­date mod­ern­iza­tion reduc­tions that are like­ly to be required,” Panet­ta added. 

Fund­ing for the war is exempt from seques­tra­tion, the sec­re­tary wrote. But, he added, the effects on the base bud­get would be so severe that they would affect sup­port to the Afghan war. Con­tract­ing, for exam­ple, would be impaired, he wrote, because the num­ber of con­tract­ing per­son­nel would be reduced. 

The effects on the defense bud­get and pro­grams would be far-reach­ing, Panet­ta wrote. Seques­tra­tion reduc­tions, he added, could mean ter­mi­nat­ing the joint strike fight­er and the next-gen­er­a­tion bomber and inter­con­ti­nen­tal bal­lis­tic mis­sile. It could ter­mi­nate all ground com­bat vehi­cle mod­ern­iza­tion pro­grams, he not­ed, and mean “min­i­mal life exten­sions and upgrades” to cur­rent equipment. 

The seques­tra­tion could mean elim­i­nat­ing ICBMs, one leg of the nation’s strate­gic tri­ad, Panet­ta wrote. It could also stop Euro­pean mis­sile defense and delay or ter­mi­nate intel­li­gence, sur­veil­lance and recon­nais­sance systems. 

While the means will shrink, the threats will not, Panet­ta said. 

“As a result, we would have to for­mu­late a new secu­ri­ty strat­e­gy that accept­ed sub­stan­tial risk of not meet­ing our defense needs,” he added. “A seques­tra­tion bud­get is not one that I could recommend.” 

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefence.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →