Panetta, Dempsey: U.S.-Iraq Partnership Will Continue

WASHINGTON, Nov. 15, 2011 — Iraq and its forces are pre­pared to cope with the secu­ri­ty chal­lenges they will face after U.S. troops with­draw, Defense Depart­ment lead­ers told Con­gress today.

Defense Sec­re­tary Leon E. Panet­ta and Army Gen. Mar­tin E. Dempsey, chair­man of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, described their views on those chal­lenges in tes­ti­mo­ny before the Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee.

“Today, thanks to innu­mer­able sac­ri­fices from all involved, Iraq is gov­ern­ing itself,” Panet­ta said. “It’s a sov­er­eign nation. It’s an emerg­ing source of sta­bil­i­ty in a vital part of the world. And as an emerg­ing democ­ra­cy, it is capa­ble of [address­ing] its own secu­ri­ty needs.”

The sec­re­tary said the Unit­ed States seeks to con­tin­ue a rela­tion­ship with Iraq based on mutu­al respect and inter­ests.

With the State Depart­ment set to lead U.S. efforts in Iraq after troops with­draw by Dec. 31, a struc­ture remains that allows the Unit­ed States to con­tin­ue assist­ing the Iraqi gov­ern­ment, Panet­ta said.

The State Depart­ment-led Office of Secu­ri­ty Coop­er­a­tion will include a lim­it­ed num­ber of U.S. mil­i­tary per­son­nel assigned to the embassy, he said, and the U.S.-Iraq strate­gic frame­work agree­ment pro­vides “a plat­form for future coop­er­a­tion in coun­tert­er­ror­ism, in naval and air defense, and in joint exer­cis­es.”

The sec­re­tary said coun­ter­ing extrem­ism, reduc­ing inter­nal fric­tion and clos­ing gaps in the country’s exter­nal defense capa­bil­i­ty will be key chal­lenges for the Iraqi gov­ern­ment.

Al-Qai­da in Iraq and Iran­ian-backed mil­i­tant groups remain capa­ble of plan­ning and car­ry­ing out peri­od­ic high-pro­file attacks, Panet­ta acknowl­edged. But those groups, he added, lack sup­port among the Iraqi peo­ple, and Iraq’s coun­tert­er­ror­ism forces are among the most capa­ble in the region.

“We will be in a posi­tion to con­tin­ue to assist them in build­ing these capa­bil­i­ties through our Office of Secu­ri­ty Coop­er­a­tion,” the sec­re­tary said.

Con­flict among Sun­ni, Shi­ia, Kurd and oth­er polit­i­cal blocs like­wise will pose a chal­lenge, Panet­ta said.

“As in any democ­ra­cy, Iraq deals with a range of com­pet­ing agen­das,” the sec­re­tary not­ed. “But the solu­tions to these chal­lenges lie in the polit­i­cal — not the mil­i­tary — realm.”

U.S. Ambas­sador to Iraq James Jef­frey and his team, Panet­ta said, are work­ing with the Iraqis in main­tain­ing dia­logue and sus­tain­ing coop­er­a­tion along the Arab-Kurd ele­ments in the north. And Iraqi forces are devel­op­ing the sys­tems and exper­tise they’ll need for a robust exter­nal defense, the sec­re­tary not­ed, though they will need assis­tance in this area, includ­ing logis­tics and air defense.

“That will be an impor­tant focus of the Office of Secu­ri­ty Coop­er­a­tion,” Panet­ta said. “The recent deci­sion by the Iraqis to pur­chase U.S. F‑16s, part of a $7.5 bil­lion for­eign mil­i­tary sales pro­gram, demon­strates Iraq’s com­mit­ment to build up its exter­nal defense capa­bil­i­ties and main­tain a last­ing [mil­i­tary-to-mil­i­tary] train­ing rela­tion­ship with the Unit­ed States.”

Panet­ta cit­ed Iran’s region­al ambi­tions as anoth­er chal­lenge Iraq faces.

“Tehran has sought to weak­en Iraq by try­ing to under­mine its polit­i­cal process­es and … by facil­i­tat­ing vio­lence against inno­cent Iraqi civil­ians and against Amer­i­can troops,” the sec­re­tary said.

Those actions, cou­pled with Iran’s grow­ing bal­lis­tic mis­sile capa­bil­i­ty and efforts to advance its nuclear pro­gram, he added, rep­re­sent “a sig­nif­i­cant threat to Iraq, the broad­er region and U.S. inter­ests.”

The strong and self-reliant Iraq he sees emerg­ing, Panet­ta said, has no desire to be dom­i­nat­ed by Iran or any­one else, and the Unit­ed States and region­al part­ners are com­mit­ted to coun­ter­ing Iran’s desta­bi­liz­ing efforts.

“We’ve made very clear that we’re com­mit­ted to pre­vent­ing Iran from acquir­ing nuclear weapons,” the sec­re­tary said. “And while we have strength­ened our region­al secu­ri­ty rela­tion­ship in recent years, Tehran’s desta­bi­liz­ing activ­i­ties have only fur­ther iso­lat­ed that regime.”

Panet­ta said the U.S. mes­sage to allies, friends and poten­tial adver­saries in the Mid­dle East region is clear.

“We have more than 40,000 Amer­i­can troops that remain in the Gulf region; we’re not going any­where,” Panet­ta said. “And we will con­tin­ue to reas­sure our part­ners, deter aggres­sors and counter those seek­ing to cre­ate insta­bil­i­ty.”

Iraq has come through a dif­fi­cult peri­od in its his­to­ry, he said, and it has emerged stronger with a gov­ern­ment that is large­ly rep­re­sen­ta­tive of, and increas­ing­ly respon­sive to, the needs of its peo­ple.

“This out­come was nev­er cer­tain, espe­cial­ly dur­ing the war’s dark­est days,” the sec­re­tary added. “It is a tes­ta­ment to the strength and resilience of our troops that we helped the Iraqi peo­ple reverse a des­per­ate sit­u­a­tion, and pro­vid­ed them the time and space to fos­ter the insti­tu­tions of a rep­re­sen­ta­tive gov­ern­ment.”

More than a mil­lion Amer­i­cans served in Iraq. More than 32,000 have been wound­ed, and near­ly 4,500 ser­vice mem­bers “made the ulti­mate sac­ri­fice for this mis­sion,” Panet­ta said.

Large­ly as a result of their efforts, he said, “Iraq is now an inde­pen­dent and sov­er­eign coun­try that can gov­ern and secure itself, and hope­ful­ly, make the deci­sions that are in the inter­ests of its peo­ple.”

Dempsey told the com­mit­tee he took com­mand of the 1st Armored Divi­sion in Bagh­dad in June 2003, and nine months lat­er the unit’s effort to estab­lish secu­ri­ty, devel­op Iraqi forces, restore ser­vices and encour­age Iraqis to take con­trol of their own des­tiny “was at risk.”

Dempsey recount­ed that the division’s tour of duty was extend­ed by four months to sup­press an upris­ing in Iraq’s south­ern provinces, and that as com­man­der, he vis­it­ed most of the organization’s small­er units to explain to troops why it was impor­tant they remain.

“To their great and ever­last­ing cred­it, to a man and woman, they rec­og­nized the impor­tance of our mis­sion, they embraced the chal­lenge, and they did what their nation asked them to do,” Dempsey said. “As I look back, I think I’ll remem­ber most the tough­ness, the resolve and the resilience of America’s sons and daugh­ters and their fam­i­lies in those ear­ly days. Some­times … actu­al­ly, always, their char­ac­ter shines through in the tough­est of times.”

Dis­cus­sion about the future of post-con­flict Iraq requires some con­text, the chair­man said.

“In 1991, I left my fam­i­ly to dri­ve Iraq out of Kuwait,” the chair­man said. “In 2003, I left my fam­i­ly to dri­ve Sad­dam Hus­sein out of Bagh­dad. And in 2011, we’re talk­ing about estab­lish­ing a nor­mal secu­ri­ty rela­tion­ship with Iraq.”

The amount of Amer­i­can blood and trea­sure invest­ed in Iraq has cre­at­ed a bond going for­ward, Dempsey added. “Our futures are inex­tri­ca­bly linked,” he said.

The Unit­ed States must con­tin­ue to sup­port Iraqi secu­ri­ty forces’ devel­op­ment and the diplo­mat­ic effort to demon­strate com­mit­ment to Iraq’s nascent democ­ra­cy, the chair­man said.

Dempsey said that while he is con­cerned about Iraq’s future, Amer­i­can forces are “proud to have been part of this effort to pro­vide Iraq the oppor­tu­ni­ties it now has.”

After the troop with­draw­al out­lined in the 2008 U.S.-Iraq secu­ri­ty agree­ment is com­plete, the gen­er­al said, a fur­ther series of nego­ti­a­tions will address areas where the Unit­ed States can con­tin­ue assis­tance to Iraq.

“We’re eager to be part of the effort to deter­mine how we can con­tin­ue to part­ner with them on issues of com­mon inter­est for the future,” Dempsey said.

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →