Panetta, Dempsey Discuss Iranian Situation

WASHINGTON, Jan. 8, 2012 — Defense Depart­ment lead­ers agree inter­na­tion­al eco­nom­ic pres­sure rep­re­sents a bet­ter option than mil­i­tary action in deal­ing with Iran.

In an inter­view with Bob Schi­ef­fer that aired today on the CBS news pro­gram “Face the Nation,” Defense Sec­re­tary Leon E. Panet­ta and Joint Chiefs Chair­man Army Gen. Mar­tin E. Dempsey said while the U.S. gov­ern­ment prefers to peace­ful­ly resolve fric­tion with Iran, the depart­ment close­ly mon­i­tors Iran’s nuclear pro­gram and actions affect­ing the Strait of Hor­muz.

“We know that they’re try­ing to devel­op a nuclear capa­bil­i­ty, and that’s what con­cerns us,” Panet­ta said. “Our red line to Iran is: do not devel­op a nuclear weapon.”

The sec­re­tary not­ed all options to counter Iran, includ­ing mil­i­tary action, remain on the table.

“But the respon­si­ble thing to do right now is to keep putting diplo­mat­ic and eco­nom­ic pres­sure on them to force them to do the right thing, and to make sure they do not make the deci­sion to pro­ceed with the devel­op­ment of a nuclear weapon,” he said.

U.S. sanc­tions against Iran date to 1979, when an exec­u­tive order froze Iran­ian assets in the Unit­ed States in response to Iran­ian stu­dents’ hostage tak­ing at the U.S. embassy in Tehran.

U.S. sanc­tions increased with a 1984 order lim­it­ing arms sales and pro­hibit­ing inter­na­tion­al loans to Iran. A 1987 exec­u­tive order banned imports of Iran­ian-ori­gin goods and ser­vices in response to aggres­sive action against ship­ping in the Per­sian Gulf.

Respond­ing to Iran’s sup­port of inter­na­tion­al ter­ror­ism and pur­suit of weapons of mass destruc­tion, the Unit­ed States imposed fur­ther sanc­tions in 1995, bar­ring U.S. involve­ment with petro­le­um devel­op­ment in Iran.

Addi­tion­al sanc­tions in 1997, 2008 and 2010 lim­it­ed U.S. invest­ment, fund trans­fers and food trade with Iran. The 2012 Nation­al Defense Autho­riza­tion Act impos­es sanc­tions against Iran’s cen­tral bank, affect­ing Iran­ian oil exports to nations that do busi­ness with the Unit­ed States.

The UN Secu­ri­ty Coun­cil has imposed four rounds of eco­nom­ic sanc­tions against Iran, most recent­ly in 2010.

Panet­ta said the inter­na­tion­al strat­e­gy toward Iran — “to try to con­vince [them] that if they want to do what’s right, they need to join the inter­na­tion­al fam­i­ly of nations and act in a respon­si­ble way — is work­ing.”

The inter­na­tion­al com­mu­ni­ty should con­tin­ue work­ing togeth­er on issues relat­ing to Iran, he said.

“We have com­mon cause here,” Panet­ta said. “We’re not inter­est­ed in them devel­op­ing a nuclear weapon; we are not inter­est­ed in them pro­lif­er­at­ing vio­lence through­out that region; we are not inter­est­ed in them try­ing to assist in ter­ror­ism; we are not inter­est­ed in them try­ing to desta­bi­lize gov­ern­ments in that region or any­place else.”

If Iran takes the step to devel­op a nuclear weapon, he added, “They’re going to get stopped.”

Iran devel­op­ing a nuclear weapon or block­ing the Strait of Hor­muz both rep­re­sent “red lines” for the Unit­ed States, the sec­re­tary said. The Iran­ian gov­ern­ment has threat­ened to pro­hib­it or restrict inter­na­tion­al mar­itime tran­sit through the strait, which con­nects the Gulf of Oman and the Per­sian Gulf, and is the only ocean access for most Per­sian Gulf nations.

Iran could close the strait for a time, Dempsey said, but the Unit­ed States has the abil­i­ty to reopen the water­way.

“Yes, they can block it,” the chair­man said. “We’ve described that as an intol­er­a­ble act, and it’s not just intol­er­a­ble for us, it’s intol­er­a­ble to the world. But we would take action and reopen the straits.”

Dempsey said his job as the nation’s senior mil­i­tary offi­cer is to ensure U.S. forces are pre­pared for any action they are ordered to car­ry out.

“My respon­si­bil­i­ty [regard­ing Iran] is to encour­age the right degree of plan­ning, to under­stand the risks asso­ci­at­ed with any kind of mil­i­tary action, [and] in some cas­es to posi­tion assets to pro­vide those options in a time­ly fash­ion,” he said. “And all those activ­i­ties are going on. ”

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twit­ter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →