Panetta: Budget Cuts Will Boost Risk to Nation at War

WASHINGTON, Sept. 20, 2011 — Bud­get cuts cre­ate more risk for the mil­i­tary in time of war, but the risk can be reduced by mak­ing deci­sions strate­gi­cal­ly and pro­tect­ing core nation­al secu­ri­ty inter­ests, Defense Sec­re­tary Leon E. Panet­ta said today.

“While we will con­tin­ue to focus on reduc­ing over­head and dupli­ca­tion, make no mis­take,” Panet­ta told reporters dur­ing a Pen­ta­gon news brief­ing, “these reduc­tions will force us to take on greater risk in our mis­sion to pro­tect the coun­try in time of war and in the face of grow­ing secu­ri­ty challenges.” 

The nation must think and act smart­ly as it makes dif­fi­cult but nec­es­sary fis­cal deci­sions about force struc­ture, per­son­nel and oper­a­tions, Navy Adm. Mike Mullen, chair­man of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who joined Panet­ta at the brief­ing, said. 

“It is because I believe that our nation­al debt is our great­est nation­al secu­ri­ty threat that I also believe we must do our part to reduce it, to lim­it its harm,” he added. 

The depart­ment, Panet­ta said, is under­go­ing a strat­e­gy-dri­ven process to pre­pare to imple­ment the more than $450 bil­lion in sav­ings that will be required over 10 years as a result of the debt-lim­it agreement. 

“This review is still ongo­ing,” he said. “No deci­sions have been made, but I am com­mit­ted to mak­ing these deci­sions based on the best advice that I receive from the ser­vice sec­re­taries and from the ser­vice chiefs, as well as the com­bat­ant commanders.” 

The fol­low­ing prin­ci­ples will guide such deci­sions, he said. The nation must: 

— Main­tain the world’s best mil­i­tary, a force capa­ble of deter­ring con­flict, pro­ject­ing pow­er and win­ning wars; 

— Avoid a hol­low force and main­tain a mil­i­tary that, even if small­er, is ready, agile and deployable; 

— Take a bal­anced approach to the entire bud­get for poten­tial sav­ings — from trim­ming dupli­ca­tion and bureau­crat­ic over­head to improv­ing com­pe­ti­tion and man­age­ment in oper­at­ing and invest­ment pro­grams, to tight­en­ing per­son­nel costs and devel­op­ing a small­er, more agile and flex­i­ble future force; and 

— Keep faith with the men and women in uni­form because the vol­un­teer force is cen­tral to a strong future military. 

Panet­ta said that the bud­get-cut­ting envi­ron­ment “can be used as an oppor­tu­ni­ty to shape the very best defense we can for this coun­try as we approach the next 10 years.” 

Achiev­ing the man­dat­ed sav­ings “will be very hard and require extreme­ly dif­fi­cult trade­offs,” Panet­ta said. He added that an auto­mat­ic trig­ger in the nation’s debt-reduc­tion law to take more cuts out of fed­er­al spend­ing if Con­gress fails to agree on reduc­tions by Nov. 24 would be poten­tial­ly devastating. 

For the Defense Depart­ment, that means anoth­er $500 bil­lion from defense spend­ing over 10 years, on top of more than $450 bil­lion in cuts already iden­ti­fied over the same period. 

“The rough­ly $1 tril­lion in cuts forced by sequester would leave us with a mil­i­tary that would be unable to pro­tect this nation from the range of secu­ri­ty threats we face,” the sec­re­tary said. 

Such seques­tra­tion would hol­low out the force, reduc­ing mil­i­tary and eco­nom­ic strength, he added. 

“Can­cel­la­tion of weapon sys­tems, con­struc­tion projects [and] research activ­i­ty would seri­ous­ly crip­ple our indus­tri­al base,” Panet­ta said, “which would be unac­cept­able not only to me as sec­re­tary of defense, but to our abil­i­ty to be able to main­tain the best defense system.” 

Mullen said the depart­ment must begin with a clear-eyed assess­ment of things the joint force must con­tin­ue to do for the nation and the options it must be able to pro­vide the president. 

“And [we must] be will­ing to cur­tail or even end those mis­sions and capa­bil­i­ties which do not com­port with that strat­e­gy,” the chair­man said. 

The Unit­ed States must con­sid­er the world as it is, the threats as we see them, he added. 

“Pro­grams that are behind sched­ule or woe­ful­ly over bud­get should be con­sid­ered for elim­i­na­tion. The per­son­nel accounts, which make up the vast major­i­ty of our allo­ca­tion, should be scrubbed for inef­fi­cien­cies and over­head,” Mullen said. 

Exer­cis­es and oper­a­tions that do not direct­ly con­tribute to essen­tial secu­ri­ty com­mit­ments should be recal­i­brat­ed, he added. 

“We ought to make sure that the mil­i­tary is the right one for the future: flex­i­ble and adapt­able enough to fight wars both big and small, near and far,” the chair­man said, “a force that can secure our nation­al inter­ests, and not by its size and shape define those interests.” 

Mullen said he is con­vinced the effort to find more than $450 bil­lion dol­lars in cuts over the next 10 years is achiev­able, but agreed with Panet­ta that pos­si­ble seques­tra­tion cuts puts “at risk the very secu­ri­ty we are charged to provide.” 

Ten years of war have not bro­ken the all-vol­un­teer force, the chair­man said, “but dras­tic bud­get mea­sures that adverse­ly affect the lives and liveli­hoods of our peo­ple very well might. We can afford to lose some things, but we can­not to lose them.” 

The bud­get envi­ron­ment presents dif­fi­cult choic­es for our armed forces, Panet­ta said. 

“I believe that if we can avoid fur­ther cuts, we will have an oppor­tu­ni­ty to set pri­or­i­ties and make the hard choic­es need­ed to build a stronger force for the future,” he said, “and to keep faith with our men and women in uniform.” 

U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →