Pakistan Gate Closure Doesn’t Affect Afghan Mission

WASHINGTON, Oct. 1, 2010 — U.S. and NATO oper­a­tions in Afghanistan con­tin­ue with­out issues despite the loss of access yes­ter­day to a major sup­ply route through Pak­istan, Pen­ta­gon offi­cials said today.

Pakistan’s mil­i­tary closed the cross­ing at Torkham Gate along the bor­der of Afghanistan and north­west­ern Pak­istan after U.S. heli­copters yes­ter­day unknow­ing­ly killed sev­er­al Pak­istani bor­der guards, Marine Corps Col. Dave Lapan, a Pen­ta­gon spokesman, told reporters.

“It is still the case, at last reports, that Torkham Gate remains closed,” Lapan said. “We are still dis­cussing with the Pak­istan gov­ern­ment that Pak­ista­nis resolve this and get it re-opened, but in the mean­time, there is still no imme­di­ate impact on our oper­a­tions in Afghanistan.”

About 50 per­cent of coali­tion forces’ non-lethal sup­plies, such as water, food and fuel come into Afghanistan from Pakistan’s Torkham and Shaman gates, he added.

The inci­dent was not the first such attack this week where Amer­i­can air­craft unknow­ing­ly killed Pak­ista­nis that were not insur­gents. Lapan said ris­ing ten­sions among Pak­ista­nis along the bor­der prompt­ed Pakistan’s deci­sion to close the gate.

“What the Pak­istani mil­i­tary described to us was that the clo­sure of the gate was due to their con­cerns over ris­ing ten­sions,” he said. “It was to them a secu­ri­ty issue; ten­sions in the area due to these inci­dents.

Such ten­sions led to a mil­i­tant attack on a NATO con­voy this morn­ing in south­ern Afghanistan. The con­voy was car­ry­ing fuel, trav­el­ing about 250 miles north of Karachi when mil­i­tants torched more than two dozen trucks.

Pak­istani offi­cials are inves­ti­gat­ing that attack, Lapan not­ed.

Lapan lat­er added that com­mu­ni­ca­tion along the bor­der between Pak­istan bor­der secu­ri­ty ele­ments and coali­tion forces in Afghanistan is always dif­fi­cult. Yesterday’s inci­dent was not inten­tion­al, he said.

“The action was in self defense,” Lapan said, explain­ing that the bor­der guards fired what were lat­er deter­mined as warn­ing shots at the U.S. heli­copters.

The inci­dent occurred along the bor­der near Afghanistan’s Dand Patan dis­trict in Pak­tiya province. Inter­na­tion­al Secu­ri­ty Assis­tance Forces observed insur­gents attempt­ing to fire mor­tars at a coali­tion base near­by. An air weapons team was called into action and destroyed the insur­gent fir­ing posi­tion.

The heli­copters were tem­porar­i­ly in Pak­istani air­space when they received the warn­ing shots, Lapan said. Lapan could not con­firm if com­mu­ni­ca­tion pro­to­cols between Pak­istan bor­der guards and ISAF were fol­lowed. The inci­dent is cur­rent­ly under inves­ti­ga­tion by ISAF and Pakistan’s gov­ern­ment, he added.

“The focus of this assess­ment is defin­ing those activ­i­ties that hap­pened in the bor­der region,” he said. “The attack implies that the insur­gents con­tin­ue to use that bor­der area to launch attacks, believ­ing that they have refuge.

“Insur­gents are attack­ing from this bor­der region, and we’re coun­ter­ing,” Lapan added. “The exact cir­cum­stances of how this came to be and whether pro­to­cols were fol­lowed — it’s what we’re look­ing into.”

Mean­while, the Amer­i­can mil­i­tary con­tin­ues to pro­vide relief to flood vic­tims in north­west­ern Pak­istan, he said. U.S. mil­i­tary aid oper­a­tions began Aug. 5 with Army heli­copters from Afghanistan deliv­er­ing sup­plies and res­cu­ing those trapped by flood­ing. Marine heli­copters from the USS Peleliu replaced the Army air­craft, and togeth­er they have deliv­ered more than 8 mil­lion pounds or relief sup­plies.

Air Force C‑130s and C‑17s have been deliv­er­ing aid since Aug. 16. As of last week, air­men have deliv­ered more than 5.5 mil­lion pounds of aid. This brings the total to almost 13.7 mil­lion pounds of aid, Lapan said.

The U.S. mil­i­tary air­craft have res­cued more than 20,000 dis­placed Pak­ista­nis.

“Flood relief efforts con­tin­ue,” Lapan said. “It has not been curbed, but there are ongo­ing dis­cus­sions about what the need is, because there are now roads open that were not pre­vi­ous­ly.”

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twit­ter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →