Operational Uncertainties Require Flexibility, Gates Says

SEYMOUR JOHNSON AIR FORCE BASE, N.C., May 6, 2011 — The les­son Amer­i­cans should take from recent mil­i­tary oper­a­tions is that we can­not pre­dict where or how U.S. forces will be engaged, and hav­ing flex­i­ble capa­bil­i­ties is the best defense for the nation, Defense Sec­re­tary Robert M. Gates said here today.

Since the Viet­nam War, U.S. lead­ers have a “per­fect” record in fore­cast­ing where Amer­i­ca is going to use mil­i­tary pow­er next: “We have nev­er once got­ten it right,” Gates said to about 450 air­men in a hangar at this F‑15 Strike Eagle base. 

“We just don’t know, and that’s why we have to be pre­pared,” he said. 

Giv­en that record, Gates said, the equip­ment the mil­i­tary buys and the capa­bil­i­ties it devel­ops must be broad based. Espe­cial­ly in a time of bud­get con­straints, he said, “we need to buy capa­bil­i­ties that have the max­i­mum pos­si­ble flex­i­bil­i­ty for the broad­est pos­si­ble range of conflict.” 

Amer­i­cans should be cau­tious about sig­nif­i­cant cuts in the defense bud­get, Gates said. Four times in the last cen­tu­ry Amer­i­ca has sig­nif­i­cant­ly reduced its mil­i­tary capa­bil­i­ties after a war – World War I, World Wart II, Viet­nam and the Cold War. Each time it was because peo­ple thought the world had changed, that chal­lenges had gone away. 

“Human nature has­n’t changed,” he said. “There will always be despots out there, there will always be aggres­sors and tyrants. 

“The Unit­ed States must keep its mil­i­tary capa­bil­i­ties strong as it look to the future, because we can’t tell what the future will hold,” he said. 

The fed­er­al debt cri­sis is dire, but that seems to be the only time a democ­ra­cy will con­front a prob­lem, the sec­re­tary said. “All through our his­to­ry, peo­ple will try and put off deal­ing with a cri­sis for as long as they can, until it can­not be put off any longer,” he said. “If there is a con­sen­sus in Wash­ing­ton on one thing, it is that we can­not put off deal­ing with this cri­sis any longer.” 

A strong defense needs a strong econ­o­my, and the Defense Depart­ment has a role to play in cut­ting the deficit, Gates said. There are more sav­ings to be made, par­tic­u­lar­ly in infra­struc­ture and med­ical cov­er­age, which is eat­ing away at the Defense bud­get, he said. 

“What I have been try­ing to do – in deal­ing with the Con­gress and the White House – is say, ‘Let’s not do this as math, as opposed to strat­e­gy,” he said. “Let’s take a look at our capa­bil­i­ties; let’s take a look at sce­nario-based force plan­ning and see where we can take addi­tion­al risk.” 

The coun­try needs a process that pro­vides the pres­i­dent and Con­gress options that make sense, the sec­re­tary said. The options would be real­is­tic and con­vey, “if you want to reduce Defense by this much, these are the changes in assump­tions you have to make, and here is the added risk you face if you head in that direc­tion,” he said. 

If the coun­try has the time to adopt this bud­get strat­e­gy, and plans for reduc­tions, “and do it intel­li­gent­ly, we can do our part with­out weak­en­ing our nation­al secu­ri­ty,” he said. 

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefence.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →