Officials Suggest New Role for More Capable Reserve Force

WASHINGTON — Capa­bil­i­ties gained from a decade of com­bat have trans­formed mil­i­tary reserve com­po­nents into a full-spec­trum oper­a­tional force that should be inte­grat­ed into the active fight­ing force, a defense offi­cial said today.
Paul Patrick, deputy assis­tant sec­re­tary of defense for reserve affairs for readi­ness train­ing and mobi­liza­tion, briefed an audi­ence here on the Com­pre­hen­sive Review of the Future Role of the Reserve Com­po­nent, approved by Defense Sec­re­tary Robert M. Gates on April 27.

The report calls on the Defense Depart­ment to insti­tu­tion­al­ize expe­ri­ences and inte­gra­tion that has occurred among the Nation­al Guard and reserves over the last 10 years After oper­a­tions in Iraq and Afghanistan are over, Patrick said.

The reserve com­po­nents study was a prod­uct of the Pentagon’s Qua­dren­ni­al Defense Review, com­plet­ed last year. The review called for a com­pre­hen­sive look at the roles of the Nation­al Guard and reserves, and the bal­ance between active and reserve forces.

Den­nis M. McCarthy, assis­tant sec­re­tary of defense for reserve affairs, and Marine Corps Gen. James E. Cartwright, vice chair­man of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, were co-chairs in the review.

“The 21st cen­tu­ry will require the Unit­ed States to main­tain an array of forces that can con­sis­tent­ly win across the full spec­trum of mil­i­tary oper­a­tions on a glob­al scale,” McCarthy and Cartwright wrote in the study fore­word.

“These forces must be aug­ment­ed by an acces­si­ble and ready pool of rein­forc­ing and com­ple­men­tary capa­bil­i­ties, some of which will reside in our reserve com­po­nents,” they added, not­ing that “the poli­cies and prac­tices nec­es­sary to use the Nation­al Guard and reserve as the report sug­gests have not been ful­ly insti­tu­tion­al­ized.”

At the brief­ing, Robert Smi­ley, prin­ci­pal deputy for readi­ness train­ing and mobi­liza­tion in the office of the assis­tant sec­re­tary of defense for reserve affairs, said 24 DOD agen­cies par­tic­i­pat­ed in the study, which offered sev­en sug­ges­tions for best use of the part-time mil­i­tary force.

In its cur­rent role — as units, teams and indi­vid­u­als — the reserve com­po­nent par­tic­i­pates in over­seas con­flicts, defends the home­land against exter­nal attacks and sup­ports civ­il author­i­ties in response to attacks or nat­ur­al dis­as­ters.

In major com­bat oper­a­tions it aug­ments and rein­forces the nation­al effort with com­bat and sup­port forces, sup­ports com­bat­ant com­man­ders world­wide and sup­ports the efforts of the mil­i­tary ser­vices to pre­serve the all-vol­un­teer force.

Accord­ing to the report, sev­er­al options exist for rebal­anc­ing capa­bil­i­ties in the total mil­i­tary force.

These include rely­ing on the reserve com­po­nent when build­ing force struc­ture to avoid short­falls or expand capac­i­ty, assign­ing some recur­ring oper­a­tional mis­sions to reserve com­po­nent units, and estab­lish­ing long-term rela­tion­ships between spe­cif­ic guard or reserve units and indi­vid­ual com­bat­ant com­mands.

“If you have the same peo­ple come back to the same well sev­er­al times, we think that works out bet­ter, and this long-term rela­tion­ship we think is a good deal,” Smi­ley said. “[Intel­li­gence] peo­ple do that now,” he added. “A lot of [reserve] folks work on intel things, and the intel folks see the same peo­ple over and over again. It’s a good idea to build these rela­tion­ships.”

Oth­er options include estab­lish­ing nation­al or region­al reserve units staffed with peo­ple who are will­ing to serve on active duty more often or for longer peri­ods than usu­al based on indi­vid­ual mis­sions, and using reservists to respond to emerg­ing needs like cyber defense.

“How do I cap­ture [an] engi­neer from Microsoft and say to him, ‘You don’t have to join the mil­i­tary all the time, but we need your exper­tise for this require­ment?’ Smi­ley asked. “What can we do in the reserves?” he con­tin­ued. “How do we recruit that per­son, how do we retain that per­son, and what’s the prop­er way to com­pen­sate that per­son?”

The report also sug­gest­ed inte­grat­ing active and reserve forces into blend­ed units, and assign­ing some insti­tu­tion­al sup­port tasks — recruit­ing, orga­niz­ing, sup­ply­ing, equip­ping, train­ing and oth­ers — to reserve-com­po­nent units, teams or indi­vid­u­als.

With­out employ­ing the Guard and reserves, the report says, “the Unit­ed States can­not con­tin­ue to remain engaged glob­al­ly, giv­en DOD’s cur­rent force struc­ture.”

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twit­ter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →