Officials Invite Spouses to Share Employment Ups, Downs

WASHINGTON — Defense Depart­ment offi­cials are invit­ing mil­i­tary spous­es to air their state licens­ing issues and con­cerns as part of an over­all effort to boost spous­es’ edu­ca­tion and career oppor­tu­ni­ties.
The depart­ment has cre­at­ed a dis­cus­sion board where spous­es can describe their expe­ri­ences — both good and bad — with state licens­es and cer­ti­fi­ca­tions as they move from state to state.

“We’d like to elim­i­nate bar­ri­ers that would enable spous­es to pur­sue their goals, and licen­sure is a major bar­ri­er to spous­es as they seek careers,” Aggie Byers, senior pol­i­cy ana­lyst with the Spouse Edu­ca­tion and Career Oppor­tu­ni­ties pro­gram, told Amer­i­can Forces Press Ser­vice.

One-third of employed mil­i­tary spous­es are in career fields that require a state license, such as some health care pro­fes­sion­als, teach­ers, accoun­tants, phar­ma­cy tech­ni­cians and med­ical billers, explained Ed Kringer, direc­tor of state liai­son and edu­ca­tion­al oppor­tu­ni­ty for the Pentagon’s office of mil­i­tary com­mu­ni­ty and fam­i­ly pol­i­cy.

Offi­cials often encour­age mil­i­tary spous­es to pur­sue portable careers, since they may offer eas­i­er paths to employ­ment in new loca­tions. How­ev­er, spous­es are run­ning into some issues as they move from state to state, Kringer acknowl­edged.

A license that’s valid in one state isn’t always valid in anoth­er, he explained, ren­der­ing spous­es unable to work until they can com­plete the licens­ing require­ments for their new state of res­i­dence.

Com­pound­ing the issue, some states have strin­gent appli­ca­tion process­es or the board may only meet once every three to four months. If spous­es miss one board, they’ll poten­tial­ly have to wait months for anoth­er. In worst-case sce­nar­ios, some states don’t endorse anoth­er state’s license at all, leav­ing those spous­es back at square one in the licens­ing process, Kringer said.

“The process can be con­fus­ing, time-con­sum­ing, expen­sive, and can leave spous­es out of the job mar­ket for long peri­ods of time,” he said. “We real­ize that a spouse may only be [in a state] for two to three years, and will be miss­ing six months or more of work.”

This lack of employ­ment can have a snow­ball effect, he not­ed. States often require peo­ple to demon­strate rea­son­able com­pe­ten­cy, which entails exper­tise gained on the job. A spouse, for exam­ple, may be required to have worked two out of the past four years in a career to obtain a license. But mil­i­tary spous­es who lived over­seas for sev­er­al years, or in a small town with lim­it­ed career oppor­tu­ni­ties, may not be able to meet this require­ment, he added.

To counter these issues and oth­ers, Defense Depart­ment offi­cials are work­ing with states to stream­line process­es and elim­i­nate licens­ing bar­ri­ers, Kringer said.

Offi­cials have focused past efforts on eas­ing the tran­si­tion process for reg­is­tered nurs­es and teach­ers. For exam­ple, Kringer said, offi­cials have worked with states over the past sev­er­al years on a licen­sure com­pact that will ease state-to-state tran­si­tions for reg­is­tered nurs­es. For teach­ers, he added, they’ve been ask­ing states to accept one spe­cif­ic cer­tifi­cate across the board rather than requir­ing a new cer­tifi­cate in each state.

How­ev­er, only about 11 per­cent of work­ing spous­es are reg­is­tered nurs­es or teach­ers, accord­ing to the cur­rent pop­u­la­tion sur­vey, Kringer not­ed, so offi­cials are work­ing to min­i­mize the chal­lenges fac­ing spous­es in all portable careers.

Efforts to insti­tute change already have paid off, he said.

Col­orado, for exam­ple, passed an endorse­ment bill last year that’s speed­ing up the licens­ing process for mil­i­tary spous­es, Kringer said. Col­orado has a reg­u­la­to­ry agency that over­sees 77 dif­fer­ent careers that require a license. The leg­is­la­tion gives the agency’s direc­tor author­i­ty to grant endorse­ments with­out board approval, elim­i­nat­ing some­times lengthy waits for a board to meet. Addi­tion­al­ly, the state now accepts con­tin­u­ing edu­ca­tion units in lieu of expe­ri­ence, he added.

More than 25 oth­er states have sim­i­lar reg­u­la­to­ry agen­cies, he said, and offi­cials are hope­ful they’ll pass sim­i­lar bills once they learn of Colorado’s suc­cess.

Also last year, Flori­da passed a bill that enables mil­i­tary spous­es with a valid license from anoth­er state to auto­mat­i­cal­ly obtain a tem­po­rary six-month license, Kringer said. This gives spous­es the oppor­tu­ni­ty to seek employ­ment while fil­ing for their per­ma­nent license, he explained.

The state also has devel­oped a process to expe­dite the required back­ground check. Rather than sev­er­al weeks or months, spous­es can have their back­ground checks done in a week.

But despite these efforts, Kringer said, offi­cials know they may be miss­ing an issue or poten­tial solu­tion. “We don’t know if we’re doing it per­fect­ly,” he acknowl­edged. “We made edu­cat­ed guess­es that helped frame these ini­tial efforts, but now we need to hear from spous­es.”

Kringer encour­aged spous­es to use the dis­cus­sion board so offi­cials can bet­ter direct their efforts. They’d like to hear what prob­lems spous­es are fac­ing or have faced, he said, and they’re hop­ing to learn from suc­cess sto­ries as well.

The dis­cus­sion board, he added, also can serve as a source of infor­ma­tion to oth­ers. Spous­es can learn from some­one else’s lessons learned, for exam­ple.

Although offi­cials hope for exten­sive input, Kringer cau­tioned that spous­es should­n’t expect per­son­al­ized respons­es. The dis­cus­sion board isn’t intend­ed to fix indi­vid­ual issues with states, he explained, but rather is an oppor­tu­ni­ty to offer feed­back to ensure offi­cials are mov­ing in the right direc­tion. “This isn’t going to be a quick process, but over the years we should make good head­way,” he said.

Lead­ers under­stand how dis­rup­tive fre­quent mil­i­tary moves can be to a career, Kringer not­ed.

“There are ben­e­fits, but it’s dis­rup­tive,” he said. “And no mat­ter how well we work this, we can’t make it so it’s not dis­rup­tive. But we want to min­i­mize that dis­rup­tion as much as pos­si­ble.”

This effort is part of an over­all, inter­a­gency effort to increase spouse employ­ment oppor­tu­ni­ties, Byers explained, not­ing that spouse employ­ment was one of the key issues iden­ti­fied in a White House report released last month titled “Strength­en­ing our Mil­i­tary Fam­i­lies: Meet­ing America’s Com­mit­ment.” The report not only iden­ti­fied key issues mil­i­tary fam­i­lies face, but also pre­sent­ed the pro­grams and resources gov­ern­ment agen­cies plan to launch in the com­ing months to address them.

For exam­ple, the Trea­sury and Defense depart­ments are work­ing togeth­er to release a report on licens­ing and cre­den­tial­ing prac­tices faced by mil­i­tary spous­es.

“Spouse edu­ca­tion and employ­ment mat­ters because it leads to their ful­fill­ment,” Byers said. “If they feel ful­filled pro­fes­sion­al­ly … they’ll have a greater chance to thrive while serv­ing the nation.”

Peo­ple can find more infor­ma­tion about spouse edu­ca­tion and career oppor­tu­ni­ties, includ­ing free career coun­sel­ing, on the Mil­i­tary One­Source web­site.

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twit­ter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →