Officials: Defense-Intelligence Integration Strongest Since 9/11

WASHINGTON, Sept. 8, 2011 — The 9/11 attacks on the U.S. home­land forged a bond between the Defense Depart­ment and nation­al-mis­sion intel­li­gence agen­cies that has nev­er been stronger and that grows with each new chal­lenge, defense offi­cials said in the days before the tragedy’s 10th anniver­sary.

“The biggest change in intel­li­gence capa­bil­i­ties since 9/11 has occurred with­in intel­li­gence orga­ni­za­tions … and not across them,” Michael G. Vick­ers, under­sec­re­tary of defense for intel­li­gence, told Amer­i­can Forces Press Ser­vice.

“Improved intel­li­gence is more about focus, pri­or­i­ties, addi­tion­al capac­i­ty and new capa­bil­i­ties,” he added.

Four of the five big nation­al intel­li­gence agen­cies are part of the Defense Depart­ment, Vick­ers said. These are the Defense Intel­li­gence Agency, the Nation­al Secu­ri­ty Agency, the Nation­al Geospa­tial-Intel­li­gence Agency and the Nation­al Recon­nais­sance Office.

The CIA is an inde­pen­dent agency whose pri­ma­ry cus­tomer is the pres­i­dent of the Unit­ed States.

The need for improve­ment among intel­li­gence agen­cies was addressed in the 2004 report of the Nation­al Com­mis­sion of the Ter­ror­ist Attacks Upon the Unit­ed States, called the 9/11 Com­mis­sion.

Accord­ing to the report, legal, pol­i­cy and cul­tur­al bar­ri­ers among fed­er­al agen­cies, includ­ing intel­li­gence agen­cies, seri­ous­ly imped­ed the kind of infor­ma­tion shar­ing that might have dis­rupt­ed the 9/11 attacks.

This month, in a “Tenth Anniver­sary Report Card” to the nation on how com­mis­sion rec­om­men­da­tions have been imple­ment­ed, 9/11 Com­mis­sion Chair­man Thomas Kean and Vice Chair­man Lee H. Hamil­ton said key intel­li­gence com­mu­ni­ty rela­tion­ships seem to be improv­ing and mov­ing in a con­struc­tive direc­tion.

“Infor­ma­tion shar­ing with­in the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment and among fed­er­al, state, local author­i­ties and with allies, while not per­fect,” the report authors said, “has con­sid­er­ably improved since 9/11.”

Part of the improve­ment results from an intel­li­gence bud­get that has risen to more than $80 bil­lion, more than dou­ble what was spent in 2001, they added, and fed­er­al, state and local author­i­ties inves­ti­gate leads and share infor­ma­tion in 72 fusion cen­ters and 105 joint ter­ror­ism task forces.

“The FBI, CIA and the broad­er intel­li­gence com­mu­ni­ty have imple­ment­ed sig­nif­i­cant reforms,” they said, “dis­rupt­ing many plots and bring­ing to jus­tice many ter­ror­ist oper­a­tives.”

In response to com­mis­sion rec­om­men­da­tions and to uni­fy and focus the com­mu­ni­ty, in 2004 Con­gress cre­at­ed the Office of the Direc­tor of Nation­al Intel­li­gence, which assumed many func­tions of the posi­tions of direc­tor and deputy direc­tor of Cen­tral Intel­li­gence.

At the same time, Con­gress cre­at­ed the Nation­al Coun­tert­er­ror­ism Cen­ter, part of the ODNI, with experts from the CIA, FBI, Defense Depart­ment and oth­er agen­cies.

Cre­ation of the Office of the ODNI and DNI “lets the CIA direc­tor focus on the core busi­ness of run­ning the CIA and its many activ­i­ties and oper­a­tions,” Vick­ers said.

The ODNI has pro­vid­ed more depth on such jobs as over­sight of intel­li­gence resources, he added, not­ing that man­ag­ing the intel­li­gence com­mu­ni­ty was one of three jobs for the for­mer direc­tor of cen­tral intel­li­gence.

But new posi­tions and cen­ters do not dri­ve the depth of inte­gra­tion occur­ring among DOD and nation­al-mis­sion intel­li­gence agen­cies, he said.

Today, many “intel­li­gence agen­cies are embed­ded in each other’s orga­ni­za­tions,” Vick­ers said, ” … and a lot of the inte­gra­tion has been hor­i­zon­tal and dri­ven by mis­sion and not imposed top down” by the DNI.

“The ana­lyt­i­cal com­mu­ni­ty had gen­er­al­ly been pret­ty inte­grat­ed,” Vick­ers said, adding that there has been much more inte­gra­tion among those who per­form oper­a­tional intel­li­gence func­tions.

“So [sig­nals intel­li­gence] and [geospa­tial intel­li­gence] and oth­ers are embed­ded in each other’s orga­ni­za­tions, we have more CIA rep­re­sen­ta­tives around in the com­mands, and there’s just a lot more orga­ni­za­tion­al inte­gra­tion than there’s been in the past,” Vick­ers added, not­ing that he speaks dai­ly with the CIA act­ing direc­tor and the per­ma­nent deputy direc­tor.

These orga­ni­za­tions, the under­sec­re­tary said, “have com­mon cause like they’ve nev­er had before and they need each other’s capa­bil­i­ties to get the job done.”

In Vick­ers’ cur­rent posi­tion, he said among his top pri­or­i­ties are “to make sure we have even tighter inte­gra­tion between defense and nation­al intel­li­gence and between our spe­cial oper­a­tions forces and intel­li­gence, as demon­strat­ed by the bin Laden raid.”

In the face of declin­ing bud­gets, the under­sec­re­tary added, the intel­li­gence com­mu­ni­ty must max­i­mize its capa­bil­i­ties.

“As we decide which tech­nolo­gies or resources to invest in, and how much struc­ture to keep, it’s impor­tant that we do this across the intel­li­gence com­mu­ni­ty,” Vick­ers said.

“The DNI, the sec­re­tary of defense and in my posi­tion as exer­cis­ing author­i­ty, direc­tion and con­trol on behalf of the sec­re­tary,” he added, “it’s very impor­tant that the three of us work that very close­ly.”

At the Defense Intel­li­gence Agency, Deputy Direc­tor for Analy­sis Jef­frey N. Rapp said inte­gra­tion among DOD, DIA and the rest of the intel­li­gence com­mu­ni­ty is “one of the real­ly big suc­cess sto­ries for DIA.”

Col­lab­o­ra­tion with DOD sis­ter agen­cies such as NSA and NGA has been “superb,” Rapp said, and has improved with oth­er agen­cies in the intel­li­gence com­mu­ni­ty, includ­ing CIA.

“Our ana­lysts cer­tain­ly work very well togeth­er,” Rapp said. “On a dai­ly basis they inter­act and col­lab­o­rate on pro­duc­tion,” includ­ing prod­ucts that go to the pres­i­dent.

The deputy direc­tor for analy­sis said he and his CIA coun­ter­part meet reg­u­lar­ly and work togeth­er in sev­er­al intel­li­gence forums, and that the orga­ni­za­tions joint­ly host ana­lyt­ic con­fer­ences.

“They attend our con­fer­ences and we attend theirs,” he added, “so they’re full-blown mem­bers and col­lab­o­ra­tive part­ners on a wide vari­ety of top­ics and pro­duc­tion areas for us.”

Inter­nal­ly, Rapp said, DIA has become an expe­di­tionary com­bat sup­port agency.

“We’ve got almost 150 ana­lysts deployed for­ward right now,” he said. “I don’t think that was the pat­tern pre‑9/11. In cer­tain niche areas we’d deploy an ana­lyst here or there, but DIA in my view real­ly stepped up to the plate in terms of pro­vid­ing sub­ject mat­ter exper­tise and ana­lyt­ic capa­bil­i­ty.”

As DIA has engaged over the past decade in Oper­a­tion Endur­ing Free­dom and Oper­a­tion Iraqi Free­dom, Rapp said, infor­ma­tion shar­ing with coali­tion part­ners has improved dra­mat­i­cal­ly.

“The agen­cies have real­ized a need to do this to enable mis­sion accom­plish­ment at the front end, so you see high­ly inte­grat­ed efforts on the bat­tle­field where infor­ma­tion has per­isha­bil­i­ty, it’s oper­a­tional­ly focused and it’s need­ed to con­duct oper­a­tions,” he said.

“Everybody’s come to the table on that,” Rapp added. “When you go for­ward, you find CIA, NSA, NGA, DIA — every­body work­ing togeth­er right there on the floor in a tac­ti­cal oper­a­tions cen­ter or sup­port­ing a com­mand. It’s real­ly pret­ty remark­able the kind of col­lab­o­ra­tion and inte­gra­tion that’s going on to enable oper­a­tions.”

As far back as Desert Storm, he said, there was shar­ing but it was clunky — stovepiped in some places, pro for­ma in oth­ers.

“Today it’s much more enabled because lead­er­ship at the high­est lev­els in the ODNI, in the agen­cies, have got­ten behind it and fig­ured out a way to do it with­out com­pro­mis­ing sen­si­tive mate­r­i­al and sources,” Rapp said.

Joint duty has also helped fos­ter inte­gra­tion, the deputy direc­tor for analy­sis said.

In 1986 Con­gress passed the Gold­wa­ter-Nichols Act, man­dat­ing that pro­mo­tion to high rank in the mil­i­tary ser­vices required duty with a dif­fer­ent ser­vice or a joint com­mand.

In 2007, then-DNI Mike McConnell signed imple­ment­ing instruc­tions for the intel­li­gence community’s Civil­ian Joint Duty Pro­gram, a civil­ian per­son­nel rota­tion sys­tem.

“That’s start­ing to make a dif­fer­ence as we send our per­son­nel out to work in oth­er agen­cies and with­in the com­mu­ni­ty in oth­er posi­tions,” Rapp said.

“They come back with a dif­fer­ent under­stand­ing of how those agen­cies [and those cul­tures] work and how they do busi­ness, and … oth­er agen­cies send folks here and get that same under­stand­ing.”

All over the intel­li­gence com­mu­ni­ty, Rapp said, lead­er­ship at all lev­els stress­es col­lab­o­ra­tion.

“If lead­er­ship isn’t … demand­ing that it be made a part of the cul­ture, it does­n’t hap­pen,” he said, “And lead­er­ship is tru­ly com­mit­ted at many lev­els to try to make this work bet­ter.”

Per­haps the most vis­i­ble result of the increased inte­gra­tion among defense and nation­al-mis­sion intel­li­gence agen­cies was the suc­cess­ful assault this year on the com­pound in Abbot­tabad, Pak­istan, that killed Osama bin Laden.

“Hav­ing been at CIA on the day of the Bin Laden oper­a­tion, that was for me a crys­tal­liz­ing moment,” George Lit­tle, who served as direc­tor of pub­lic affairs dur­ing Defense Sec­re­tary Leon E. Panetta’s tenure as CIA direc­tor, told Amer­i­can Forces Press Ser­vice.

“It was­n’t about what uni­form you wear or what badge you wear or what orga­ni­za­tion you work for,” said Lit­tle, who is now press sec­re­tary for the Defense Depart­ment.

“Both the U.S. mil­i­tary and the CIA were one team, one fight, and in this case one oper­a­tion,” he added. “It’s a vivid and obvi­ous­ly high-pro­file exam­ple of the coop­er­a­tion that can take place and I think that’s going to con­tin­ue.”

On the 9/11 Commission’s descrip­tion of bar­ri­ers to infor­ma­tion shar­ing among intel­li­gence agen­cies, Lit­tle said the impor­tant point to real­ize “is that on 9/12, both orga­ni­za­tions imme­di­ate­ly went to work to pro­tect the nation and have been at a wartime ops tem­po ever since.”

In the CIA’s Coun­tert­er­ror­ism Cen­ter, Lit­tle said, “a sign hangs to this day that says, ‘Today is 9/12.’ And I think both the CIA and the U.S. mil­i­tary are oper­at­ing with that kind of sense of pur­pose.”

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →