Official Cites Importance of Stability in Taiwan Strait

WASHINGTON, Oct. 4, 2011 — The Unit­ed States remains com­mit­ted to Tai­wan and to peace and sta­bil­i­ty in the Tai­wan Strait, a Pen­ta­gon offi­cial told the House For­eign Affairs Com­mit­tee today.

“Sta­bil­i­ty in the Tai­wan Strait is crit­i­cal­ly impor­tant to the Oba­ma admin­is­tra­tion, and has a strong bear­ing on our endur­ing inter­ests in and com­mit­ments to peace and sta­bil­i­ty in the Asian-Pacif­ic region,” said Peter Lavoy, prin­ci­pal assis­tant sec­re­tary of defense for Asian and Pacif­ic secu­ri­ty affairs.

“The Oba­ma admin­is­tra­tion is firm­ly com­mit­ted to our ‘One Chi­na’ pol­i­cy, which is based on three joint U.S.-China communiqu�and the Tai­wan Rela­tions Act,” he added.

The Tai­wan Rela­tions Act of 1979 has gov­erned pol­i­cy in the absence of a diplo­mat­ic rela­tion­ship or a defense treaty with Tai­wan. Addi­tion­al­ly, key state­ments that guide pol­i­cy are the three U.S.-China Joint Communiqu�of 1972, 1979 and 1982 and the “Six Assur­ances” of 1982.

“This pol­i­cy has endured for over three decades and across eight admin­is­tra­tions,” Lavoy not­ed. “Today, the Unit­ed States has a deep secu­ri­ty rela­tion­ship with Tai­wan, as indi­cat­ed by the administration’s strong record on arms sales.”

Con­gress has approved more than $12 bil­lon in defense aid for Tai­wan in the last two years, Lavoy said. “We will con­tin­ue to make avail­able to Tai­wan defense arti­cles and ser­vices to enable it to main­tain a suf­fi­cient self-defense capa­bil­i­ty,” he told the pan­el.

Lavoy said the administration’s rela­tion­ship with Tai­wan “encom­pass­es much more than arms trans­fers.”

“The Depart­ment of Defense has a respon­si­bil­i­ty to mon­i­tor China’s mil­i­tary devel­op­ments and to deter aggres­sion and con­flict,” he said, not­ing that China’s armed forces have made sig­nif­i­cant advances in tech­nol­o­gy and strate­gic abil­i­ty.

“China’s eco­nom­ic rise has enabled it to trans­form its armed forces from a mass army designed for wars of attri­tion on its own ter­ri­to­ry to one capa­ble of fight­ing short-dura­tion, high-inten­si­ty con­flict along its periph­ery against high-tech adver­saries,” he said.

China’s abil­i­ty to sus­tain mil­i­tary pow­er at a dis­tance remains lim­it­ed, he said, but its armed forces are devel­op­ing and field­ing advanced mil­i­tary tech­nolo­gies to sup­port attacks and anti-access and aer­i­al denial strate­gies. Chi­na also has posi­tioned advanced equip­ment oppo­site Taiwan’s mil­i­tary regions, Lavoy said.

“Bei­jing fields advanced sur­face com­bat­ants and sub­marines to increase its anti-sur­face and anti-war­fare capa­bil­i­ties,” he said. “Sim­i­lar­ly, advanced fight­er air­craft and inte­grat­ed air defense sys­tems deployed to bases and gar­risons in the coastal regions increase Beijing’s abil­i­ty to gain and main­tain air supe­ri­or­i­ty over the Tai­wan Strait.”

These sys­tems would enable Chi­na to con­duct offen­sive counter-air and land attacks against Tai­wanese forces and crit­i­cal infra­struc­ture, he explained.

“In response to this grow­ing threat, Tai­wan author­i­ties have under­tak­en a series of reforms designed to improve the island’s capac­i­ty to deter and defend against an attack by the main­land,” he said.

Point­ing to invest­ments in infra­struc­ture, war reserve, cri­sis response and oth­er reforms, Lavoy said these improve­ments would help to secure the island.

“[These reforms] have rein­forced the nat­ur­al advan­tages of island defense,” he said. “Taiwan’s defense reforms today are impor­tant and nec­es­sary, and fur­ther efforts are need­ed.”

Lavoy referred to the Tai­wan Rela­tions Act as “a good law that makes for good pol­i­cy,” and said it has cre­at­ed the con­di­tions for the two sides to engage in peace­ful dia­logue.

“Our strong secu­ri­ty com­mit­ment to Tai­wan has pro­vid­ed them the con­fi­dence to inten­si­fy dia­logue with the main­land and has result­ed in improved cross-strait rela­tions,” he said. “A Tai­wan that is strong, con­fi­dent and free from threats or intim­i­da­tion is best pos­tured to dis­cuss and adhere to what­ev­er future arrange­ments the two sides of the Tai­wan Strait may peace­ful­ly agree upon.”

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →