Obama Makes Case for U.S. Participation in Libya

WASHINGTON, March 28, 2011 — It was in America’s vital inter­ests to stop a mas­sacre in Libya, Pres­i­dent Barack Oba­ma said today at the Nation­al Defense Uni­ver­si­ty.
Oba­ma spoke of the jus­ti­fi­ca­tion for estab­lish­ing the no-fly zone over Libya and pro­tect­ing the Libyan peo­ple from Moam­mar Gadhafi’s regime to an audi­ence of stu­dents and fac­ul­ty gath­ered at Lin­coln Hall on Fort Les­ley J. McNair here.

Oba­ma spoke of the cru­el­ty that Gad­hafi showed in sup­press­ing Libyans who want­ed a dif­fer­ent gov­ern­ment for the country. 

“In the face of the world’s con­dem­na­tion, Gad­hafi chose to esca­late his attacks, launch­ing a mil­i­tary cam­paign against the Libyan peo­ple,” Oba­ma said. “Inno­cent peo­ple were tar­get­ed for killing. Hos­pi­tals and ambu­lances were attacked. Jour­nal­ists were arrest­ed, sex­u­al­ly assault­ed and killed.” 

Gad­hafi ordered his sol­diers to cut off food, water and fuel to cities along the coast, and shelled cities and towns. “Mil­i­tary jets and heli­copter gun­ships were unleashed upon peo­ple who had no means to defend them­selves against assault from the air,” he said. 

“Con­front­ed by this bru­tal repres­sion and a loom­ing human­i­tar­i­an cri­sis, I ordered war­ships into the Mediter­ranean,” the pres­i­dent said. “Euro­pean allies declared their will­ing­ness to com­mit resources to stop the killing. The Libyan oppo­si­tion, and the Arab League, appealed to the world to save lives in Libya. 

“At my direc­tion,” he con­tin­ued, “Amer­i­ca led an effort with our allies at the Unit­ed Nations Secu­ri­ty Coun­cil to pass an his­toric res­o­lu­tion that autho­rized a no-fly zone to stop the regime’s attacks from the air, and fur­ther autho­rized all nec­es­sary mea­sures to pro­tect the Libyan people.” 

The coali­tion began mil­i­tary oper­a­tions to enforce the U.N. res­o­lu­tion nine days ago, after it became appar­ent that regime forces were bear­ing down on Beng­hazi – the strong­hold of the rebel­lion and home to more than 700,000 men, women and children. 

“We knew that if we wait­ed one more day, Beng­hazi … could suf­fer a mas­sacre that would have rever­ber­at­ed across the region and stained the con­science of the world,” Oba­ma said. “It was not in our nation­al inter­est to let that hap­pen,” the pres­i­dent said. “I refused to let that happen.” 

After con­sult­ing con­gres­sion­al lead­ers, Oba­ma ordered the strikes to save Beng­hazi. “We hit Gadhafi’s troops in neigh­bor­ing Ajd­abiya, allow­ing the oppo­si­tion to dri­ve them out,” he said. “We hit his air defens­es, which paved the way for a no-fly zone. We tar­get­ed tanks and mil­i­tary assets that had been chok­ing off towns and cities and we cut off much of their source of sup­ply. And tonight, I can report that we have stopped Gadhafi’s dead­ly advance.” 

The Unit­ed States act­ed as leader of a coali­tion of nations. The Unit­ed King­dom, France, Cana­da, Den­mark, Nor­way, Italy, Spain, Greece, Turkey, Qatar and the Unit­ed Arab Emi­rates joined in the respon­si­bil­i­ty to defend the Libyan peo­ple, Oba­ma said. 

“In just one month, the Unit­ed States has worked with our inter­na­tion­al part­ners to mobi­lize a broad coali­tion, secure an inter­na­tion­al man­date to pro­tect civil­ians, stop an advanc­ing army, pre­vent a mas­sacre, and estab­lish a no-fly zone with our allies and part­ners,” he said. 

“To lend some per­spec­tive on how rapid­ly this mil­i­tary and diplo­mat­ic response came togeth­er, when peo­ple were being bru­tal­ized in Bosnia in the 1990s, it took the inter­na­tion­al com­mu­ni­ty more than a year to inter­vene with air pow­er to pro­tect civil­ians,” he con­tin­ued. “We did it in 31 days.” 

These objec­tives are con­sis­tent with the president’s pledge that the U.S. mil­i­tary role would be lim­it­ed. No U.S. ground forces are in Libya, and unique Amer­i­can capa­bil­i­ties that were impor­tant at the begin­ning of this oper­a­tion are being with­drawn. How­ev­er, Amer­i­can sup­port will con­tin­ue as NATO takes com­mand. “This trans­fer from the Unit­ed States to NATO will take place on Wednes­day,” Oba­ma said. 

Still, the Unit­ed States will con­tin­ue to work with inter­na­tion­al part­ners to pro­vide assis­tance to the peo­ple of Libya, and the Unit­ed States will hold in trust $33 bil­lion of seized Libyan assets to help rebuild the coun­try. Oba­ma is send­ing Sec­re­tary of State Hillary Rod­ham Clin­ton to Lon­don where she will meet with Libyan oppo­si­tion mem­bers and rep­re­sen­ta­tives from more than 30 nations. 

“These dis­cus­sions will focus on what kind of polit­i­cal effort is nec­es­sary to pres­sure Gad­hafi, while also sup­port­ing a tran­si­tion to the future that the Libyan peo­ple deserve,” Oba­ma said. “Because while our mil­i­tary mis­sion is nar­row­ly focused on sav­ing lives, we con­tin­ue to pur­sue the broad­er goal of a Libya that belongs not to a dic­ta­tor, but to its people.” 

And the peo­ple of Libya ulti­mate­ly must decide what hap­pens in their coun­try. “Gad­hafi has not yet stepped down from pow­er, and until he does, Libya will remain dan­ger­ous,” he said. He promised U.S. help as the process continues. 

Oba­ma appealed to Amer­i­can ideals and val­ues in respect to stop­ping a mas­sacre in Libya. “Some ques­tion why Amer­i­ca should inter­vene at all – even in lim­it­ed ways – in this dis­tant land,” he said. “They argue that there are many places in the world where inno­cent civil­ians face bru­tal vio­lence at the hands of their gov­ern­ment, and Amer­i­ca should not be expect­ed to police the world, par­tic­u­lar­ly when we have so many press­ing con­cerns here at home.” 

The Unit­ed States can­not police the world, nor should it, the pres­i­dent said. “Giv­en the costs and risks of inter­ven­tion, we must always mea­sure our inter­ests against the need for action,” he said. “But that can­not be an argu­ment for nev­er act­ing on behalf of what’s right. 

“In this par­tic­u­lar coun­try – Libya; at this par­tic­u­lar moment, we were faced with the prospect of vio­lence on a hor­rif­ic scale,” he con­tin­ued. “We had a unique abil­i­ty to stop that vio­lence: an inter­na­tion­al man­date for action, a broad coali­tion pre­pared to join us, the sup­port of Arab coun­tries and a plea for help from the Libyan peo­ple them­selves. We also had the abil­i­ty to stop Gadhafi’s forces in their tracks with­out putting Amer­i­can troops on the ground.” 

Amer­i­ca has a respon­si­bil­i­ty to lead and to help those seek­ing free­dom, he said. “To brush aside … our respon­si­bil­i­ties to our fel­low human beings under such cir­cum­stances would have been a betray­al of who we are,” he said. “Some nations may be able to turn a blind eye to atroc­i­ties in oth­er coun­tries. The Unit­ed States of Amer­i­ca is dif­fer­ent. And as pres­i­dent, I refused to wait for the images of slaugh­ter and mass graves before tak­ing action.” 

Peace and ulti­mate sta­bil­i­ty in the rest of the region would have been affect­ed if Gad­hafi had been allowed to mur­der his peo­ple into sub­mis­sion. Just as Egypt and Tunisia are reach­ing for free­dom, tyrants across the area would con­clude that vio­lence is the best strat­e­gy to cling to power. 

“The writ of the U.N. Secu­ri­ty Coun­cil would have been shown to be lit­tle more than emp­ty words, crip­pling its future cred­i­bil­i­ty to uphold glob­al peace and secu­ri­ty,” he said. “So while I will nev­er min­i­mize the costs involved in mil­i­tary action, I am con­vinced that a fail­ure to act in Libya would have car­ried a far greater price for America.” 

Gad­hafi gone is best for the coun­try, the pres­i­dent said. “But broad­en­ing our mil­i­tary mis­sion to include regime change would be a mis­take,” he said flat­ly. “The task that I assigned our forces — to pro­tect the Libyan peo­ple from imme­di­ate dan­ger, and to estab­lish a no-fly zone — car­ries with it a U.N. man­date and inter­na­tion­al support.” 

Over­throw­ing Gad­hafi would splin­ter the coali­tion and require U.S. ground forces. “To be blunt, we went down that road in Iraq,” he said. “Thanks to the extra­or­di­nary sac­ri­fices of our troops and the deter­mi­na­tion of our diplo­mats, we are hope­ful about Iraq’s future. But regime change there took eight years, thou­sands of Amer­i­can and Iraqi lives, and near­ly a tril­lion dol­lars. That is not some­thing we can afford to repeat in Libya.” 

U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefence.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →