Obama Discusses Situations in Iran, Syria, Afghanistan

WASHINGTON, March 6, 2012 — Pres­i­dent Barack Oba­ma took ques­tions from reporters at a press con­fer­ence this after­noon on his administration’s poli­cies and inten­tions on sit­u­a­tions in Iran, Syr­ia and Afghanistan.

“When I came into office, Iran was uni­fied, on the move, had made sub­stan­tial progress on its nuclear pro­gram, and the world was divid­ed in terms of how to deal with it,” the pres­i­dent said. 

Over the past three years, he added, “we’ve been able to … mobi­lize unprece­dent­ed, crip­pling sanc­tions on Iran. Iran is feel­ing the bite of these sanc­tions in a sub­stan­tial way. The world is uni­fied; Iran is polit­i­cal­ly isolated.” 

Oba­ma said the Unit­ed States will not coun­te­nance Iran get­ting a nuclear weapon. 

“My pol­i­cy is not con­tain­ment. My pol­i­cy is to pre­vent them from get­ting a nuclear weapon because … that could trig­ger an arms race in the region or give ter­ror­ists access to such a weapon,” Oba­ma said, adding that the Unit­ed States has been in close con­sul­ta­tion with its allies on the strat­e­gy, includ­ing Israel. 

Oba­ma met yes­ter­day at the White House with Israeli Prime Min­is­ter Ben­jamin Netanyahu to dis­cuss Iran and oth­er issues. 

“The argu­ment that we’ve made to the Israelis is that we have made an unprece­dent­ed com­mit­ment to their secu­ri­ty. There is an unbreak­able bond between our two coun­tries,” the pres­i­dent said. 

“But one of the func­tions of friends is to make sure that we pro­vide hon­est and unvar­nished advice in terms of what is the best approach to achieve a com­mon goal, par­tic­u­lar­ly one in which we have a stake,” he added. 

If action is tak­en pre­ma­ture­ly against Iran, Oba­ma said, there will be con­se­quences for Israel, for the Unit­ed States and for the region. 

“I do think that any time we con­sid­er mil­i­tary action, the Amer­i­can peo­ple under­stand that there is going to be a price to pay,” Oba­ma said. “Some­times it’s nec­es­sary, but we don’t do it casually.” 

Sanc­tions are start­ing to have a sig­nif­i­cant effect inside Iran, the pres­i­dent added, ” … and because the sanc­tions are going to be even tougher in the com­ing months, because they’re now start­ing to affect [Iran’s] oil indus­try [and] their cen­tral bank, and because we’re now see­ing nois­es about them return­ing to the nego­ti­at­ing table … it is deeply in everybody’s inter­ests — the Unit­ed States, Israel and the world’s — to see if this can be resolved in a peace­ful fashion.” 

The Unit­ed States will con­tin­ue to apply pres­sure, he told reporters. 

“To resolve this issue will require Iran to come to the table and dis­cuss in a clear and forth­right way how to prove to the inter­na­tion­al com­mu­ni­ty that the inten­tions of their nuclear pro­gram are peace­ful,” the pres­i­dent said. “They know how to do that. This is not a mystery.” 

On the top­ic of Syr­ia, where the gov­ern­ment is killing its own peo­ple in an attempt to quell a year-long pop­u­lar upris­ing of cit­i­zens who call for the ouster of Pres­i­dent Bashar al-Assad, Oba­ma called the vio­lence there “heart­break­ing and outrageous.” 

The inter­na­tion­al com­mu­ni­ty has mobi­lized against the Assad regime, he added, and it’s not a ques­tion of if Assad leaves, but when. 

For the Unit­ed States “to take mil­i­tary action uni­lat­er­al­ly, as some have sug­gest­ed, or to think that some­how there is some sim­ple solu­tion, I think is a mis­take,” the pres­i­dent said. 

“What we’ve done is to work with key Arab states, key inter­na­tion­al part­ners — [Sec­re­tary of State] Hillary Clin­ton was in Tunisia [recent­ly] — to come togeth­er and to mobi­lize and plan” how to sup­port the oppo­si­tion, pro­vide human­i­tar­i­an assis­tance, and con­tin­ue the polit­i­cal and eco­nom­ic iso­la­tion, Oba­ma said. 

“We are going to con­tin­ue to work on this project with oth­er coun­tries,” he added, “and it is my belief that ulti­mate­ly this dic­ta­tor will fall, as dic­ta­tors in the past have fallen.” 

The notion that the way to solve every prob­lem is to deploy the U.S. mil­i­tary is incor­rect, the pres­i­dent said. 

“We’ve got to think through what we do through the lens of what’s going to be effec­tive,” he added, “but also what’s crit­i­cal for U.S. secu­ri­ty interests.” 

Tak­ing a ques­tion about the inad­ver­tent Quran-burn­ing inci­dent by U.S. troops in Kab­ul on Feb. 20, Oba­ma said the sit­u­a­tion con­cerns him. 

“I think that it is an indi­ca­tion of the chal­lenges in that envi­ron­ment, and it’s an indi­ca­tion that now is the time for us to tran­si­tion,” he said. 

The vio­lence direct­ed at Inter­na­tion­al Secu­ri­ty Assis­tance Force ser­vice mem­bers is unac­cept­able, Oba­ma said, and Afghanistan Pres­i­dent Hamid Karzai, who is nonethe­less eager for more respon­si­bil­i­ty on the Afghan side, acknowl­edged that. 

“We’re going to be able to find a mech­a­nism where­by Afghans under­stand their sov­er­eign­ty is being respect­ed and that they’re going to be tak­ing a greater and greater role in their own secu­ri­ty,” Oba­ma said. 

“That, I think, is in the inter­ests of Afghans. It’s also in our inter­ests. And I’m con­fi­dent that we can exe­cute [that], but it’s not going to be a smooth path. There are going to be bumps along the road, just as there were in Iraq,” he added. 

None of this is easy, he said, and it nev­er has been. 

“I think that Pres­i­dent Karzai under­stands that we are inter­est­ed in a strate­gic part­ner­ship with the Afghan peo­ple and the Afghan gov­ern­ment,” Oba­ma said. 

“We are not inter­est­ed in stay­ing there any longer than is nec­es­sary to assure that al-Qai­da is not oper­at­ing there,” he added, “and that there’s suf­fi­cient sta­bil­i­ty that it does­n’t end up being a free-for-all after ISAF has left.” 

Afghanistan and the Unit­ed States “share inter­ests here,” the pres­i­dent said. “It will require nego­ti­a­tions, and there will be times where things don’t look as smooth as I’d like. That’s kind of the deal inter­na­tion­al­ly on a whole range of these issues.” 

U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefence.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →