NRO Maintains Nation’s Intel Satellite Edge

WASHINGTON, Sept. 16, 2011 — The Nation­al Recon­nais­sance Office is 50 years old this month, but its mis­sion of design­ing, build­ing, launch­ing and main­tain­ing America’s intel­li­gence satel­lites is always future focused, its chief said yes­ter­day.

Bruce A. Carl­son, a retired Air Force gen­er­al and NRO’s direc­tor, told defense reporters here the office’s cur­rent mis­sions range from iden­ti­fy­ing road­side bombs in Afghanistan to track­ing activ­i­ties in Chi­na and North Korea.

The Nation­al Recon­nais­sance Office has launched six satel­lites in sev­en months, “the best we’ve done in about 25 years,” the direc­tor said.

As recent­ly as two years ago, more than 30 per­cent of the organization’s pro­grams were rat­ed yel­low or red for improp­er per­for­mance. All the NRO’s major sys­tem acqui­si­tion pro­grams are now in the green — deliv­er­ing on sched­ule, on con­tract and on price, Carl­son said.

Carl­son said NRO’s mis­sion is get­ting more chal­leng­ing because space is becom­ing increas­ing­ly con­gest­ed where the satel­lites work.

“Oth­er coun­tries are launch­ing a lot of stuff, and it’s becom­ing more com­pet­i­tive,” he said. “We all have to oper­ate in the same space.”

And it’s no secret the Chi­nese are becom­ing more active in space, the direc­tor added. “That con­cerns us because we’re not absolute­ly sure of their intent,” he said.

NRO and Air Force Space Com­mand have a joint space pro­tec­tion pro­gram, Carl­son said, which is the “ace in the hole” should “some­body try to do some­thing.”

“We also use the space pro­tec­tion pro­gram to work around the con­ges­tion prob­lem … make sure we don’t run into some­thing else up there,” he said.

Chi­na and Rus­sia both con­tend with the Unit­ed States for room in space, Carl­son said.

In satel­lite sur­veil­lance as with night fight­ing, deep strike capa­bil­i­ties and spe­cial oper­a­tions exper­tise, “they have to focus on our strengths,” the direc­tor said.

Chi­na and Rus­sia don’t try to com­pete with U.S. capa­bil­i­ties, but to counter them, Carl­son not­ed. “That’s why we have a space pro­tec­tion pro­gram,” he said.

Chi­na is a focus for his organization’s sur­veil­lance efforts, as is North Korea, Carl­son said.

“I remain con­cerned about [China’s] intent and exact­ly what it is that I do not know,” he said.

North Korea also works “real­ly hard to deceive us,” Carl­son not­ed. “We work real­ly hard to make sure we don’t let them deceive us. So it’s sort of a cat-and-mouse game. It’s very seri­ous for us.”

The NRO’s three main lines of busi­ness are imag­ing, sig­nals col­lec­tion and com­mu­ni­ca­tions, the direc­tor said. The sci­ence and tech­nol­o­gy, or devel­op­men­tal and demon­stra­tion pro­gram, under­lies all three, he added.

“We have a very active pro­gram to do our own tech­nol­o­gy,” Carl­son said. “We’re the only orga­ni­za­tion in the gov­ern­ment that does space recon­nais­sance … and that takes some unique tech­nolo­gies.”

NRO part­ners with the Nation­al Lab­o­ra­to­ries and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency in devel­op­ing new capa­bil­i­ties, but some 60 per­cent of the equip­ment on the six recent­ly launched satel­lites was devel­oped in-house, he said.

Sev­er­al oth­er small satel­lites — less than about 1,000 pounds — are now in orbit demon­strat­ing new tech­nolo­gies that NRO will roll into its exist­ing sur­veil­lance sys­tems, the direc­tor said.

For imag­ing recon­nais­sance, the NRO seeks to exam­ine as many parts of the spec­trum with as many instru­ments as pos­si­ble, he said.

The goal is to “do sens­ing … in the day­time, at night, in bad weath­er, good weath­er … and sand­storms,” he said.

Some of the sig­nals col­lec­tion satel­lites are “remark­ably old,” he said.

“Those satel­lites were designed to col­lect Sovi­et long-haul com­mu­ni­ca­tions that dealt with the Cold War,” he said. “Now they’re col­lect­ing phone calls or push-to-talk radio sig­nals out of the war zone.”

NRO uses its com­mu­ni­ca­tions satel­lites to relay image or sig­nals data around the world and down to the ground for pro­cess­ing, then shunt the results back to where they’re need­ed, Carl­son said.

“Pro­cess­ing takes a lot of ener­gy and [com­put­er] capac­i­ty,” he said. “We’ve got to do that on the ground; we can’t afford to do it in space.”

NRO’s abil­i­ty to fuse var­i­ous streams of intel­li­gence data — includ­ing image, sig­nals and geolo­ca­tion — into a sin­gle, usable result has increased by an order of mag­ni­tude, but is five orders of mag­ni­tude below where it needs to be, Carl­son said.

“It’s incred­i­bly dif­fi­cult to take a pic­ture some­place and fuse it with sig­nals intel­li­gence, that you might have a mil­lion pieces of, and sort that all out and geolo­cate it rapid­ly,” he said. “But in many cas­es we’re able to do that … in min­utes or less.”

One promis­ing exam­ple of fusion is the “red dot” sys­tem, Carl­son said, which pin­points the sig­nals emit­ted by road­side bombs set for elec­tron­ic det­o­na­tion.

“We do a lot of work to make sure that we know what those sig­nals are, where they’re com­ing from, and geolo­cate them,” he said.

That data gen­er­ates a red dot on dis­plays in mil­i­tary vehi­cles or com­mand posts to show high prob­a­bil­i­ty of an explo­sive, he added.

“I can’t tell you exact­ly how we do that, but it’s a pret­ty clever set of tech­nolo­gies,” the direc­tor said. “What it has meant is that, even though we still have an unac­cept­able loss from [road­side bombs], we are catch­ing a lot of them before they’re det­o­nat­ed.”

The sys­tem has been in place for approx­i­mate­ly six months and has been about 80 per­cent effec­tive, he added.

NRO was also “instru­men­tal” to the NATO oper­a­tion in Libya, ensur­ing the air cam­paign was suc­cess­ful, Carl­son said.

The NRO feeds data to mil­i­tary com­man­ders, he said, but it is also a key strate­gic asset, serv­ing the Nation­al Secu­ri­ty Agency and Nation­al Geospa­tial-Intel­li­gence Agency.

There will always be com­pe­ti­tion between, for exam­ple, the infor­ma­tion an ana­lyst wants to assess for­eign weapon sys­tems and a com­bat commander’s need to know where and how many cell phones are oper­at­ing in a par­tic­u­lar ene­my area, the direc­tor not­ed.

Whether iden­ti­fy­ing insur­gent behav­ior pat­terns or focus­ing on larg­er nation­al secu­ri­ty ques­tions, Carl­son said, “My job is to … get the most out of a sen­sor.”

There are only so many satel­lites in orbit, so NRO has an inclu­sive and respon­sive process to allo­cate its 24-hour capa­bil­i­ties, he said.

“What that allows us to do is very rapid­ly … world­wide and through­out our archi­tec­ture, tune those sys­tems,” he said.

An exam­ple is an air­craft bailout requir­ing a search-and-res­cue effort, he said.

“We can, with­in a mat­ter of sec­onds, turn an incred­i­ble num­ber of our sen­sors on a spe­cif­ic area,” he added.

Carl­son said dur­ing NRO’s next 50 years, the chal­lenges are to do what it now does even bet­ter, and to devel­op more in-space capa­bil­i­ty.

“We know what we have to do — we have to pro­vide the best, inte­grat­ed intel­li­gence in the world,” he said. “Now, [we have to] do it faster and cheap­er.”

Space satel­lites have always focused down­ward, and now need to be able to look around and up as well, he said.

“Because space is more con­gest­ed and more con­test­ed and more com­pet­i­tive … we’ve got to build sys­tems that con­tin­ue to be much more adapt­able,” he said. “Space recon­nais­sance — that’s my job.”

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →