Navy Strives to Build on Expertise Gained Since 9/11

WASHINGTON, June 3, 2011 — Com­mit­ted to pre­serv­ing and build­ing on exper­tise gar­nered dur­ing the past decade of con­flict, the Navy is hard at work insti­tu­tion­al­iz­ing lessons learned as the mil­i­tary draws down in Iraq and looks toward a draw­down in Afghanistan as well, one of the fleet’s top train­ing offi­cers report­ed.

aircraft carrier USS Ronald Reagan
Sailors erect a crash bar­ri­cade dur­ing flight deck drills aboard the air­craft car­ri­er USS Ronald Rea­gan, deployed with its embarked Car­ri­er Air Wing 14 to the U.S. 5th Fleet area of respon­si­bil­i­ty con­duct­ing close-air sup­port mis­sions as part of oper­a­tions Endur­ing Free­dom and New Dawn. Navy offi­cials say they hope to retain skills gained dur­ing near­ly a decade of con­flict as the Navy faces the future.
U.S. Navy pho­to by Sea­man Joshua Cas­satt
Click to enlarge

Navy Capt. Michael White, chief oper­at­ing offi­cer for Naval Edu­ca­tion and Train­ing Com­mand, said the Navy is bank­ing on increased use of sim­u­la­tion and real­is­tic oper­a­tional sce­nar­ios admin­is­tered by a cadre of expe­ri­enced sailors to ensure lessons learned since the 9/11 ter­ror attacks don’t fall by the wayside. 

“As the con­flict draws down, clear­ly we may not be doing some of the same mis­sions as we do today,” said White, a rear admi­ral selectee. “So the ques­tion becomes, ‘How do you keep that in reserve?’ And essen­tial­ly, we believe that is the lega­cy of our sailors” who will draw on expe­ri­ence they are gain­ing now to train the future fleet. 

Unlike gar­ri­son-based ground forces, the Navy always has been a for­ward-deployed orga­ni­za­tion, White not­ed. That requires con­stant vig­i­lance and readi­ness to respond to con­di­tions as they arise. 

“As our sailors are going through train­ing and learn­ing from their instruc­tors, the end goal is to join a unit — a ship or squadron or con­struc­tion bat­tal­ion, what­ev­er that unit might be — that will be for­ward-deployed and ready for any action that might come up,” he said. 

And with plen­ty of exam­ples of deploy­ments that began in peace­time, then changed based on world sit­u­a­tions, White said, there’s clear recog­ni­tion through­out the Navy of the need to be ready to exe­cute the mis­sion, regard­less of its nature, on a moment’s notice. 

“It’s that for­ward-deployed men­tal­i­ty that will keep our folks sharp,” he said. 

Fac­ing the future, White said, the fleet is as com­bat-hard­ened as it’s ever been, enriched by new capa­bil­i­ties devel­oped dur­ing the past 10 years. The Navy’s 15 learn­ing cen­ters, estab­lished sev­er­al years ago as part of the Navy’s “Rev­o­lu­tion in Train­ing” ini­tia­tive, is ensur­ing the spe­cial­ized career train­ing pro­vid­ed remains aligned with activ­i­ties being con­duct­ed with­in the fleet, White said. 

In addi­tion, human per­for­mance require­ments reviews rou­tine­ly bring togeth­er the cen­ters’ learn­ing spe­cial­ists with sub­ject mat­ter experts from the fleet to keep their pro­grams as cur­rent and rel­e­vant as possible. 

“Our goal is to make sure that as things evolve, we can con­tin­u­ous­ly adapt and improve our train­ing process,” White said. 

Explo­sive ord­nance dis­pos­al divers, for exam­ple, have incor­po­rat­ed counter-impro­vised explo­sive device tac­tics, tech­niques and pro­ce­dures into their core cur­ricu­lum. In addi­tion to eval­u­at­ing the threat, they have become expert in post-blast analy­sis and inves­ti­ga­tions, and con­tin­u­al­ly evolve their train­ing to reflect cur­rent oper­a­tions, White said. Navy secu­ri­ty forces have under­gone a trans­for­ma­tion, par­tic­u­lar­ly with­in the mas­ter-at-arms and gunner’s mate rat­ings. Rather than focus­ing on basic weapons train­ing that empha­sized weapons han­dling and employ­ment in rel­a­tive­ly benign train­ing sce­nar­ios, the train­ing has been amped up to incor­po­rate the all-impor­tant deci­sion-mak­ing process. 

“The Cen­ter for Secu­ri­ty Forces has real­ly stepped that up to include judg­ment and engage­ment in the base train­ing,” White said. “It’s not only in how to employ a weapon, but what deci­sion process do you use in deter­min­ing when you should employ it.” 

This includes not just sta­t­ic weapon employ­ment, but also the abil­i­ty to “shoot, move, com­mu­ni­cate and sur­vive,” he said, whether the sailor is oper­at­ing on the ground in Afghanistan, or pro­tect­ing his ship from attack. 

The Navy also has refined its long­stand­ing vis­it, board, search and seize, or VBSS, mis­sion, par­tic­u­lar­ly in light of increased pira­cy off the coast of Soma­lia. “The train­ing for these teams has increased to not only include the basics of board­ing a ship and search­ing it, but to do it in a more tac­ti­cal man­ner, where you have per­haps a Navy boat crew and a Marine Corps team that might go aboard a ship,” White said. “We are con­duct­ing the train­ing today as part of the improve­ments in the adap­ta­tion to what we are see­ing in the fleet.” 

Oth­er major changes have occurred with­in the Navy’s Cen­ter for Infor­ma­tion Dom­i­nance, where sailors are trained to use their com­put­er sys­tems and net­works as more than just tools. “We are teach­ing our infor­ma­tion tech­ni­cians to pro­tect net­works [and] to exploit net­works and real­ly to do it on a lev­el that we haven’t done before,” White said. He not­ed that many of the tech­ni­cians are get­ting com­mer­cial cer­ti­fi­ca­tions so they have the skills to employ com­mer­cial tools that have become crit­i­cal to Navy sys­tems and net­works. Through­out the fleet, White report­ed a big empha­sis on pro­mot­ing lan­guage, cul­tur­al and region­al expertise. 

“We rec­og­nized the gap that our sailors had, where they would go into a coun­try to be part of the con­flict or human­i­tar­i­an oper­a­tions … and we had­n’t real­ly pre­pared them to be ambas­sadors, if you will, of the Unit­ed States,” he said. 

So the Navy stood up the Cen­ter for Lan­guage, Region­al Exper­tise and Cul­ture at Cor­ry Sta­tion Naval Tech­ni­cal Train­ing Cen­ter in Pen­saco­la, Fla., in March 2006. This cen­ter helps to pre­pare sailors for the mul­ti­ple and diverse cul­tures they will encounter while con­duct­ing the full spec­trum of mil­i­tary oper­a­tions across the globe, White explained. 

It has expand­ed to include cours­es cov­er­ing about 182 coun­tries, with spe­cial empha­sis on sub­jects such as Islam, Afghan cul­ture, Mid­dle East­ern eti­quette, and even the Tal­iban. “The idea is that as sailors deploy, we can give them a brief back­ground on what they might be exposed to so they don’t make those com­mon mis­takes that we would­n’t per­ceive in our Amer­i­can cul­ture that might be very offen­sive to our part­ners,” White said. 

At the high end of this train­ing con­tin­u­um, the Navy is an active par­tic­i­pant in Chair­man of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Navy Adm. Mike Mullen’s Afghanistan-Pak­istan Hands pro­gram. This pro­gram, launched in 2009, pro­vides a core cadre of most­ly mid-career offi­cers with spe­cial­ized lan­guage and cul­tur­al skills. 

Look­ing ahead to the end of the cur­rent con­flicts, White said, the Navy plans to make wide use of sim­u­la­tion to present sailors with real­is­tic, demand­ing train­ing sce­nar­ios. “To tru­ly repli­cate the chal­lenge of a wartime envi­ron­ment is tough, so what we are train­ing to do at Naval Edu­ca­tion and Train­ing Com­mand is to use tech­nol­o­gy to help us,” White said. 

Bridge sim­u­la­tors, for exam­ple, train bridge teams to enter a threat­ened port or react to an attack at sea. A mock vil­lage at the Naval Explo­sive Ord­nance Dis­pos­al School at Eglin Air Force Base, Fla., teach­es EOD tech­ni­cians to iden­ti­fy, defuse and dis­pose of IEDs and oth­er ord­nance. Sim­u­la­tors trans­form tra­di­tion­al class­rooms into set­tings that chal­lenge stu­dents to make judg­ments about the best way to respond to a par­tic­u­lar threat. 

“It is absolute­ly amaz­ing, with­in a few min­utes of the sce­nario start­ing, how quick­ly you become immersed in it and for­get your sur­round­ings as your brain tries to work through these com­pli­cat­ed things,” White said. “It is not real com­bat, but we believe we can cer­tain­ly induce some stress. I can tell you from per­son­al expe­ri­ence that you feel it. The per­spi­ra­tion begins, and it real­ly is challenging.” 

As it strives to intro­duce the emo­tion­al, intel­lec­tu­al and phys­i­cal rig­ors of com­bat into its train­ing, the Navy is apply­ing anoth­er les­son of the cur­rent con­flicts and is help­ing to give sailors the tools to cope with those demands. 

“We want to build bet­ter resilience into our sailors through the stress­es of com­bat and deploy­ment,” White said. “We are learn­ing a lot from sub­ject-mat­ter experts in indus­try and oth­er mil­i­taries, and real­ly try­ing to build that into an effec­tive train­ing tool to help our sailors cope with these stress­es so they can be resilient and ready to deploy when­ev­er and wher­ev­er they are needed.” 

(This is the fourth arti­cle in a series about how the Defense Depart­ment and the mil­i­tary ser­vices, as well as NATO, plan to main­tain com­bat effec­tive­ness and readi­ness as the cur­rent oper­a­tional tem­po begins to decline.) 

U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →