NATO to Build on Lessons of Afghanistan for Future

WASHINGTON, June 2, 2011 — A week after NATO Sec­re­tary Gen­er­al Anders Fogh Ras­mussen made a first­hand assess­ment of progress in trans­fer­ring increased secu­ri­ty respon­si­bil­i­ty to Afghan secu­ri­ty forces, the alliance’s supreme allied com­man­der for trans­for­ma­tion is focused on build­ing on lessons learned in Afghanistan for the future.

Ras­mussen vis­it­ed Afghanistan last week to reaf­firm NATO’s long-term com­mit­ment as sev­en sec­tions of the coun­try, includ­ing the city of Her­at in west­ern Afghanistan, pre­pare to tran­si­tion to Afghan secu­ri­ty respon­si­bil­i­ty July 1. Speak­ing dur­ing an online video blog, Ras­mussen called the city “an exam­ple of how Afghanistan can start progress toward Afghan leadership.” 

Laud­ing progress made dur­ing meet­ings that includ­ed Inter­na­tion­al Secu­ri­ty Assis­tance Force Com­man­der Army Gen. David H. Petraeus and Senior Civil­ian Rep­re­sen­ta­tive for Afghanistan Simon Gass, Ras­mussen made clear dur­ing a news con­fer­ence with Afghan Pres­i­dent Hamid Karzai that NATO won’t turn its back on Afghanistan. 

“Those who threat­en Afghanistan’s future should be under no illu­sion,” he said. “NATO is and remains com­mit­ted to Afghanistan.” 

Mean­while, oper­at­ing at the only U.S.-based NATO com­mand, in Nor­folk, Va., French air force Gen. Stephane Abr­i­al, NATO’s supreme allied com­man­der for trans­for­ma­tion, empha­sized the impor­tance of build­ing on lessons learned by the NATO-led Inter­na­tion­al Secu­ri­ty Assis­tance Force. 

“My hope is that we do not lose the lessons we have iden­ti­fied and learned in Afghanistan,” he said. “We need to keep them to pre­pare the troops for the future, and also to con­tin­ue devel­op­ing the know-how [and] the capa­bil­i­ties we need for this type of warfare.” 

But Abr­i­al empha­sized that NATO forces can’t con­cen­trate only on those lessons, think­ing that “the last war we have fought is the same as the future war we are going to be fac­ing.” “We need to keep an open mind,” he said, keep­ing pre­pared to address the full spec­trum of chal­lenges from con­ven­tion­al to non­con­ven­tion­al war­fare. That con­cept needs to guide the way the alliance pre­pares, orga­nizes and equips for the future, he said. 

“We need … to make sure that for the future, we can be ready for any­thing,” Abr­i­al con­tin­ued. “Who knows what is going to hap­pen tomor­row? … Will there be anoth­er cri­sis some­where else? Will we be asked to inter­vene some­where, and in which form, which fashion?” 

What applied to Afghanistan may not apply else­where, he warned. 

“We can­not say, ‘OK, what­ev­er hap­pens, we will do a new Afghanistan again. No way,” Abr­i­al said. “So don’t for­get the impor­tant lessons – but don’t con­cen­trate [only] on this type of environment.” 

Abr­i­al called the flex­i­bil­i­ty pro­vid­ed by NATO’s new strate­gic con­cept key to ensur­ing the alliance remains rel­e­vant as it faces the future. 

“To make sure that we can face any kind of chal­lenge that will arise in the next 10 years, flex­i­bil­i­ty is absolute­ly para­mount,” he said. “We have to make sure the con­cept will not be made obso­lete when we encounter the first strate­gic sur­prise. And if you look at his­to­ry, mil­i­tary his­to­ry is just a string of strate­gic surprises.” 

Sur­pris­es in the future are cer­tain, Abr­i­al assert­ed. “The chal­lenge is that we can face the sur­prise, and be ready to solve the cri­sis we will face,” he added. 

Abr­i­al shared Rasmussen’s com­mit­ment to see­ing the mis­sion through in Afghanistan, call­ing it a demon­stra­tion of NATO’s uni­ty. As the secu­ri­ty tran­si­tion takes place there, Abr­i­al said, he believes the forces freed up could be rein­vest­ed some­where else, pos­si­bly as trainers. 

“So my vision is that NATO is on the right track, and that the nations will con­tin­ue to … make this tran­si­tion pos­si­ble, togeth­er,” he said. 

(This is the third arti­cle in a series about how the Defense Depart­ment and the mil­i­tary ser­vices, as well as NATO, plan to main­tain com­bat effec­tive­ness and readi­ness as the cur­rent oper­a­tional tem­po begins to decline.) 

U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →