Mullen: Public, Private Efforts Must Help Failed States

WASHINGTON, June 29, 2011 — Nations and orga­ni­za­tions of all kinds must join togeth­er to take on the chal­lenges posed by a grow­ing num­ber of weak and fail­ing states, Navy Adm. Mike Mullen said today.

Mullen, chair­man of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, spoke at a launch event for the 2011 Failed States Index, host­ed by The Fund for Peace and Busi­ness Exec­u­tives for Nation­al Secu­ri­ty. The fund has pub­lished the index since 2005.

“[For] every sin­gle enti­ty that exists on this globe, whether it’s pub­lic or pri­vate [or] non­govern­men­tal,” Mullen said. ” … It’s imper­a­tive that we all fig­ure out how we’re going to address these chal­lenges togeth­er because … they are com­ing at us at a speed that is accel­er­at­ing.”

The index is an annu­al rank­ing of 177 nations using 12 social, eco­nom­ic and polit­i­cal indi­ca­tors of pres­sure on the state, along with more than 100 sub-indi­ca­tors. Indi­ca­tors include issues like uneven devel­op­ment, state legit­i­ma­cy, group griev­ance and human rights.

“In today’s world, many chal­lenges to inter­na­tion­al peace and pros­per­i­ty come from non­tra­di­tion­al sources,” said Ken Brill, Insti­tute for Peace pres­i­dent.

“This has direct impli­ca­tions for U.S. nation­al secu­ri­ty,” Brill added, “which needs to be thought about and act­ed on in a broad­er con­text than ever before.”

The 2011 index is based on data col­lect­ed through­out 2010, so it does not account for recent events such as Japan’s major earth­quake and tsuna­mi and upris­ings across the Mid­dle East.

For the fourth con­sec­u­tive year, the report ranks Soma­lia as the No. 1 failed state, cit­ing wide­spread law­less­ness, inef­fec­tive gov­ern­ment, ter­ror­ism, insur­gency, crime and pirate attacks against for­eign ves­sels.

At the oppo­site end of the spec­trum, Fin­land, for the first time, dis­placed Nor­way from the best posi­tion among most sta­ble coun­tries because of slight fluc­tu­a­tions in demo­graph­ic and eco­nom­ic indi­ca­tors.

Each indi­ca­tor used in the rank­ing is rat­ed on a scale of one to 10 based on the analy­sis of mil­lions of pub­licly avail­able doc­u­ments, oth­er quan­ti­ta­tive data and ana­lyt­ic assess­ments.

A high score indi­cates high pres­sure on the state, and there­fore a high­er risk of insta­bil­i­ty.

Insta­bil­i­ty cre­at­ed by fail­ing states threat­ens the nor­mal func­tion of the inter­na­tion­al mar­ket­place,” said retired Army Gen. Mont­gomery C. Meigs, pres­i­dent and chief exec­u­tive offi­cer of the Busi­ness Exec­u­tives for Nation­al Secu­ri­ty.

“Pri­vate-sec­tor ini­tia­tives and invest­ment,” he added, “can com­bat state fragili­ty, pro­mote sta­bil­i­ty and pre­vent con­flict.”

Besides Soma­lia, the top 10 failed states include, in order from the most trou­bled states, Chad, Sudan, Demo­c­ra­t­ic Repub­lic of the Con­go, Haiti, Zim­bab­we, Afghanistan, Cen­tral African Repub­lic, Iraq and Ivory Coast.

“As I look at the failed state index and look at the states that top the list … none of them are sur­pris­ing,” Mullen said. “What con­cerns me about that is the need for the glob­al enti­ties that exist to address the chal­lenges.”

Mullen described a prin­ci­ple he said has been with him through­out his career, since he was a young offi­cer deployed to Viet­nam in 1969.

“The mes­sage that came from the fam­i­lies that I would become famil­iar with,” Mullen said, was that they were anx­ious to raise their chil­dren to a high­er stan­dard of liv­ing than they had achieved, and in some sem­blance of peace and pros­per­i­ty.

“You need the peace to gen­er­ate the pros­per­i­ty to achieve that stan­dard,” he said. “That’s a glob­al stan­dard from my per­spec­tive.”

About the posi­tions of Iraq and Afghanistan on the index, Mullen said, “I’ve felt for some time, and I’m not alone in this, that Iraq has resources to gen­er­ate a thriv­ing econ­o­my.

“With the oil resources they have and the appetite the world has for oil,” he added, “I am fair­ly con­fi­dent that, over time, Iraq will pull itself out of its place on this index.” Afghanistan does not have such resources imme­di­ate­ly avail­able, the chair­man said, but the coun­try can be helped to build its econ­o­my enough to improve the lives of its peo­ple.

“For both these coun­tries, though, that’s just the eco­nom­ic side,” he said, adding that the index mea­sures gov­er­nance, secu­ri­ty, how the coun­tries’ lead­ers take care of their peo­ple, and oth­er indi­ca­tors.

For sev­er­al years, Mullen said, he has wor­ried about Yemen as a poten­tial next place for al Qai­da to call home, and the index ranks Yemen as 13th from the top of the most failed states.

While the al Qai­da lead­er­ship “still resides in the bor­der [area] between Afghanistan and Pak­istan,” the chair­man said, the fed­er­at­ed al Qai­da group in Yemen is an “incred­i­bly dan­ger­ous group” that has tak­en full advan­tage of the chaos there.

While mil­i­tary inter­ven­tion some­times is nec­es­sary to bring sta­bil­i­ty, it is nev­er the whole answer to fix­ing a failed state,” Mullen said.

“The mil­i­tary, the secu­ri­ty piece, is a nec­es­sary con­di­tion, but it is insuf­fi­cient in and of itself,” he added. “And it’s tak­ing us a long time to fig­ure that out.”

Eco­nom­ic engines – the Unit­ed States, Chi­na, India, Brazil, the Mid­dle East and Europe — will help cre­ate the stan­dard of liv­ing that most peo­ple want for their chil­dren, Mullen said.

“How do we make these eco­nom­ic engines work togeth­er so the haves and the have-nots are not as far apart?” he said. “It’s my belief that if they con­tin­ue to sep­a­rate … then I think there will be more and more failed states.”

“For those of us in lead­er­ship posi­tions, we just can’t keep talk­ing about this,” Mullen said. “We have to gen­er­ate actions on the ground.”

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →