Mullen Outlines Progress, Shortfalls in Veteran Support

WASHINGTON — The chair­man of the Joint Chiefs of Staff out­lined the Defense Department’s efforts to strength­en fam­i­lies, bol­ster edu­ca­tion oppor­tu­ni­ties and ensure a good future for its vet­er­ans — and he asked for help.
Speak­ing before the World Con­gress on Dis­abil­i­ties in Dal­las, Navy Adm. Mike Mullen recount­ed his expe­ri­ences dur­ing his ‘Con­ver­sa­tion with the Coun­try’ tour to cities through­out Amer­i­ca, where he seeks local answers to meet the chal­lenges of health care, edu­ca­tion and employ­ment for vet­er­ans return­ing from America’s wars.

“I talk to com­mu­ni­ty lead­ers about vet­er­ans who are return­ing home from these wars, who offer such great poten­tial, and who are mem­bers of the best mil­i­tary the Unit­ed States of Amer­i­ca has ever had,” he said. 

Those vet­er­ans have sac­ri­ficed tremen­dous­ly, and are on aver­age 20 to 25 years old, Mullen said, assert­ing “they are wired to serve.” If they can make a suc­cess­ful tran­si­tion from the mil­i­tary to civil­ian life, he added, they will be an asset to the nation and the world for decades to come. The cur­rent, robust GI Bill, improved mil­i­tary med­ical care and fam­i­ly sup­port pro­grams are work­ing to help vet­er­ans, he said, but the chal­lenges are not short-term. 

The old sys­tem of send­ing a for­mer ser­vice­mem­ber home and say­ing, “thank you very much, have a nice life” is not an accept­able mod­el, the chair­man said. “We have got to stay in touch with them. We’ve got to be respon­si­ble enough to know that their needs are being met, and the only way we can scale this is through com­mu­ni­ties through­out the coun­try,” he said. “I’ve got 40,000 phys­i­cal­ly wound­ed, I’ve got hun­dreds of thou­sands with [post-trau­mat­ic stress] … and that mod­el is the same mod­el that gen­er­at­ed a home­less lev­el, post-Viet­nam … that we’re still deal­ing with 50, 60 years later.” 

The Defense and Vet­er­ans Affairs depart­ments and city and com­mu­ni­ty lead­ers must work togeth­er to fig­ure out the best sys­tem to meet vet­er­an chal­lenges, Mullen said. Local lead­ers and com­mu­ni­ties are in the best posi­tion to pro­vide the sus­tained approach that’s required, he said, but “you may live in a com­mu­ni­ty and not have a clue who’s there, as they return.” 

Across the coun­try there is tremen­dous sup­port for vet­er­ans, Mullen said, and he works to focus that sup­port and con­nect it to the vet­er­ans who can ben­e­fit from it. America’s cur­rent wars are dif­fer­ent from pre­vi­ous con­flicts, and vet­er­ans today often have dif­fer­ent chal­lenges than their coun­ter­parts in the past faced, he said. “We live in an extra­or­di­nary time of change,” he said. “The wounds of these wars are dif­fer­ent, and they have caused [the mil­i­tary] in many cas­es to look at things dif­fer­ent­ly. We’ve changed – in med­i­cine, we’ve changed how we han­dle peo­ple on the bat­tle­field. Now, if you are brought to the right med­ical facil­i­ty with­in an hour, almost … with­out dis­crim­i­na­tion about the kind of wound, you have a 95 per­cent chance to survive.” 

Mil­i­tary med­i­cine also has made great strides in treat­ing ser­vice­mem­bers with ampu­ta­tions, Mullen not­ed. “We lead the world now in that,” he said. “We’ve linked up with orga­ni­za­tions all over the coun­try … to devel­op the best pros­thet­ics in the world. And we keep advanc­ing.” The mil­i­tary med­ical sys­tem also has got­ten bet­ter at help­ing ser­vice­mem­bers reha­bil­i­tate and in treat­ing brain injuries, the chair­man said. “What we are strug­gling with is the diag­no­sis and treat­ment of — as rapid­ly as pos­si­ble — the mild to mod­er­ate brain injuries,” he said. “It turns out they are unique in one sense because of the kinds of blasts that cause them.” 

The chair­man said two or three years ago he and his wife, Deb­o­rah, had lunch with a sol­dier who had lost hissight in one eye. “I asked him what hap­pened, and he said ‘The thir­ti­eth one got me,’ ” Mullen said. “Thir­ty blasts, at any lev­el, is far too many,” the chair­man said. “We’ve since shift­ed dra­mat­i­cal­ly on the bat­tle­field, to pull peo­ple out of the fight in the case of any blast, and to eval­u­ate them immediately.” 

The chair­man said the mil­i­tary has learned that imme­di­ate treat­ment of brain injuries can sig­nif­i­cant­ly lessen their long-term con­se­quences. “We’re mov­ing now, lit­er­al­ly in our tenth year [of war], for bet­ter treat­ment of those kinds of injuries on the bat­tle­field, to then tran­si­tion to long-term treat­ment here,” he said. 

The chair­man said the injury he wor­ries about most is post-trau­mat­ic stress, and its spread through­out the ser­vices and with­in the fam­i­lies of those who serve. “PTS isn’t new, and there are world experts in this room. But PTS is also part of a huge chal­lenge that we have, which is the stig­ma … they want to get back in the fight,” he said. “And get­ting (ser­vice­mem­bers) to raise their hand and ask for help is tru­ly difficult.” 

When his wife vis­its mil­i­tary spous­es, he said, she often finds peo­ple who rec­og­nize the symp­toms of post-trau­mat­ic stress in their hus­band or wife, but are afraid to ask for help because of the pos­si­ble effect on the servicemember’s career. 

“We’re start­ing to break through on that … but in addi­tion to mem­bers who have PTS, there are spous­es who have PTS-like symp­toms,” he said. With major com­bat units fac­ing their fourth or fifth deploy­ment in 10 years, mil­i­tary chil­dren also are dis­play­ing symp­toms of post-trau­mat­ic stress, the chair­man said. “You can imag­ine the load our fam­i­lies are bear­ing while the mem­bers are deployed,” he said. “We’ve nev­er been more blessed by fam­i­ly sup­port, in my 40-plus years of wear­ing the uni­form, than we have in these wars.” 

Fam­i­ly readi­ness is direct­ly tied to mil­i­tary readi­ness and “our abil­i­ty to car­ry out the mis­sion,” he said. “But we also see spous­es talk about their own chal­lenges with PTS, and their children’s chal­lenges,” Mullen said. “If I am an 11- or 12-year-old right now, I have only known war, and I have seen my father or my moth­er less than half my life.” 

Mil­i­tary fam­i­ly mem­bers who are now col­lege-aged, he said, spent their teenage years not get­ting to know a par­ent — usu­al­ly a father — in uni­form. “Those are long-term chal­lenges,” the chair­man said. Things we’ll be deal­ing with for a long time.” 

The mil­i­tary is start­ing to learn how to help ser­vice­mem­bers and mil­i­tary fam­i­lies build resilience, he said. “Ini­tial­ly, it was deploy. Then it was get ready for the return from deploy­ment, how do we pre­pare for that. Then it was get ready for the next deploy­ment,” Mul­len­said. “And what we’ve found out is we have to start build­ing resilience in every sin­gle one of us, from the first day of basic train­ing.” The mil­i­tary is still work­ing to devel­op a pre­ven­tive rather than reac­tive approach to stress issues, he said, not­ing, “We’re bet­ter than we were, but we’ve got a lot of resilience that we’ve got to build in.” 

One approach Mullen said he thinks the Defense Depart­ment will adopt is reduc­ing the num­ber of moves mil­i­tary fam­i­lies make. “What has brought to my atten­tion more than once by the woman that I live with, who has been a Navy wife for 42 years, is the crit­i­cal­i­ty of the readi­ness of our fam­i­lies to han­dle this pace,” he said. “We’re in a time when we’re just not going to be able to move peo­ple like we did … it’s edu­ca­tion, it’s kids in school, it’s spouse careers. We’re going to have to be based, I think, in places longer than we have in the past.” 

The mil­i­tary also is work­ing with schools, teach­ers, and state and local admin­is­tra­tions to ensure schools serv­ing mil­i­tary fam­i­ly mem­bers with par­ents in a com­bat zone can help them cope with the chal­lenges of a mil­i­tary lifestyle, the chair­man said. 

“Par­tic­u­lar­ly guards­men and women, and [reservists], who live in every sin­gle cor­ner of this coun­try,” he said. “They live in rur­al areas where med­ical care is not that great. They live in small com­mu­ni­ties where schools are small – and my abil­i­ty to reach out to those teach­ers and touch them, and edu­cate them about what a young boy or girl is going through, is still a challenge.” 

All of that, he said, is “part of mak­ing this war vis­i­ble, hav­ing lead­ers under­stand this, and then try to fig­ure out local solu­tions.” The oth­er chal­lenge embed­ded in today’s vet­er­an issues is sui­cide, he said. 

“This is some­thing we’re almost des­per­ate on,” the chair­man said. “It turns out the coun­try does­n’t know a lot about sui­cide: 32,000 sui­cides a year, and it is as if it is taboo. We just put it in a clos­et, nobody talks about it, and then we move on. That is not acceptable.” 

The mil­i­tary is at record sui­cide lev­els, he said. 

“We don’t know exact­ly why, though I think numer­ous com­bat deploy­ments have a lot to do with it, although a sig­nif­i­cant por­tion of those that are killing them­selves have not deployed,” Mullen said. 

The mil­i­tary has put a lot of effort into pre­vent­ing sui­cide, he said, but it needs help. 

Mullen told his audi­ence that ensur­ing vet­er­ans have the best pos­si­ble oppor­tu­ni­ties for their future lives is a debt the entire nation owes its men and women in uniform. 

He read aloud a let­ter that one wound­ed lieu­tenant, a Navy Seal, — mar­ried and the father of three — post­ed on his hos­pi­tal room door while he was recov­er­ing from sev­en bul­let wounds to the face that he received in Iraq in 2007. 

“If you’re com­ing into this room with sor­row, or to feel sor­ry for my wounds, go else­where. The wounds I received I got in a job I love, doing it for peo­ple I love, sup­port­ing the free­dom of a coun­try I deeply love. 

“I’m incred­i­bly tough and will make a full recov­ery. What is full? That is the absolute utmost phys­i­cal­ly my body has the abil­i­ty to recov­er. Then I will push that about 20 per­cent fur­ther through sheer men­tal tenac­i­ty. This room you are about to enter is a room full of fun, opti­mism, and intense rapid regrowth. If you are not pre­pared for that, go else­where,” the chair­man read. 

“He is per­fect­ly rep­re­sen­ta­tive of our young men and women today, and he rep­re­sents the poten­tial that’s there, as so many tran­si­tion from ser­vice in the mil­i­tary to their future lives,” Mullen said. 

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twitter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →