Mullen Discusses Personnel Pluses, Concerns

WASHINGTON — Call­ing per­son­nel issues his great­est com­fort and great­est con­cern, the chair­man of the Joint Chiefs of Staff today praised U.S. ser­vice­mem­bers for the way they’ve adapt­ed over a decade of war.
Navy Adm. Mike Mullen told atten­dees at a Gov­ern­ment Exec­u­tive Mag­a­zine lead­er­ship brief­ing that while he is most proud of the flex­i­bil­i­ty and adapt­abil­i­ty of Amer­i­can mil­i­tary forces, he also is con­cerned that Amer­i­ca is los­ing touch with its mil­i­tary.

The expe­ri­ence in Iraq illus­trates the adapt­abil­i­ty of Amer­i­can ser­vice mem­bers, Mullen said, not­ing that when he took office in 2007, the U.S. surge into Iraq was under way and the lev­els of vio­lence in the coun­try were high and looked to be going high­er.

“I was there last week, and it is like night and day,” Mullen said. “There has tru­ly been an extra­or­di­nary shift and change and the cre­ation of an oppor­tu­ni­ty for 26 mil­lion peo­ple that just did­n’t exist. That came at a great price, and that [this has occurred] is a reflec­tion of our military’s abil­i­ty to adapt and change from the clas­sic con­ven­tion­al force to what I call the best coun­terin­sur­gency force in the world.”

After 10 years of war and the mul­ti­ple deploy­ments that has entailed, the Amer­i­can mil­i­tary con­tin­ues to learn and adapt, Mullen said.

A well-known strength of the U.S. mil­i­tary is that it’s an all-vol­un­teer, pro­fes­sion­al force, the chair­man said. But less well known is that it’s also a weak­ness, because only a small per­cent­age of the nation’s pop­u­la­tion has a first-hand mil­i­tary con­nec­tion.

“I do wor­ry about the con­nec­tion we have with the Amer­i­can peo­ple,” the chair­man said. “We’re less than 1 per­cent of the pop­u­la­tion, we come from few­er and few­er places, and I wor­ry about the things we don’t do any more.”

The base realign­ment and clo­sure process has shut­tered many facil­i­ties, Mullen said, and that means ser­vice mem­bers no longer live in many neigh­bor­hoods around the coun­try where they once were part of the fab­ric.

“We’re not in the church­es, coach­ing the teams, going to the schools,” he said. “So the rela­tion­ship or under­stand­ing [of the mil­i­tary] is often cre­at­ed by what’s in the media.” The mil­i­tary foot­print in the coun­try will not change, the chair­man said. “But America’s mil­i­tary must stay con­nect­ed with the Amer­i­can peo­ple,” he added. “If we wake up one day and find out that we’re dis­con­nect­ed or almost dis­con­nect­ed, I think that’s a bad out­come for the coun­try.”

The Nation­al Guard and oth­er reserve com­po­nents are great avenues for con­nec­tions, he said. These ser­vice mem­bers are in every part of the coun­try and can explain the mil­i­tary to the greater pop­u­la­tion. Mullen said the mil­i­tary needs to use this avenue to bet­ter com­mu­ni­cate with Amer­i­ca.

The Amer­i­can peo­ple respect the mil­i­tary and want to reach out to sol­diers, sailors, air­men and Marines, Mullen said, but often are con­fused about how to do so. The Defense and Vet­er­ans Affairs depart­ments and local com­mu­ni­ties must work togeth­er to ease ser­vice mem­bers’ tran­si­tion to civil­ian com­mu­ni­ties when they leave the mil­i­tary, the nation’s top mil­i­tary offi­cer said.

If they do, he added, the com­mu­ni­ties cer­tain­ly will get more than they give.

“I say this gen­er­a­tion is ‘wired to serve,’ ” he said. “They are in their mid-20s, and they’ve seen some very dif­fi­cult times in some cas­es. But they offer great poten­tial for our coun­try, and with a lit­tle invest­ment, … they’ll take off and pro­vide decades of ser­vice.”

Amer­i­cans also need to reach out to those wound­ed in the wars and the fam­i­lies of those killed, Mullen said, not­ing that these fam­i­lies lost their life­lines to the mil­i­tary when their spous­es died. The mil­i­tary needs to embrace these fam­i­lies, he said, and so do America’s com­mu­ni­ties.

Final­ly, the chair­man repeat­ed a mes­sage he has empha­sized con­sis­tent­ly and repeat­ed­ly about the need for the mil­i­tary to remain apo­lit­i­cal. The U.S. mil­i­tary always is under civil­ian con­trol, and uni­formed mem­bers “need to be absolute­ly neu­tral,” Mullen said.

“We serve the civil­ian lead­er­ship,” he said, “and we need to be very mind­ful of that and how we speak about it and engage, whether we are active or reserves.”

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twit­ter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →