Mullen Addresses Transnational Crime, Military Relations

WASHINGTON, July 25, 2011 — Steps to curb transna­tion­al orga­nized crime, as addressed in a White House ini­tia­tive announced today, are impor­tant to sev­er­ing fund­ing to ter­ror­ists, the chair­man of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said today.

Transna­tion­al crime was one of sev­er­al ques­tions Navy Adm. Mike Mullen answered as part of a news brief­ing with the For­eign Press Cen­ter here. The for­eign jour­nal­ists’ ques­tions touched on U.S. mil­i­tary rela­tion­ships around the world, NATO actions in Libya and mis­sile defense. 

Asked by a Moroc­can jour­nal­ist about transna­tion­al crime in Africa, Mullen said, “If I was going to pick one area in Africa, it’s been the flow of drugs, lit­er­al­ly across the Atlantic [Ocean] that lands in North Africa and flows into Europe. The enve­lope, if you will, around it is transna­tion­al crime, and it’s some­thing I’ve been con­cerned about for years.” 

Such orga­nized crime, Mullen added, “is not just about drugs, … it’s immi­gra­tion, it’s peo­ple, it’s weapons.” 

Transna­tion­al orga­nized crime has been a mul­ti­tril­lion-dol­lar per year busi­ness “that ties in very nice­ly with the sup­port of ter­ror­ists,” he said. “I’m extreme­ly con­cerned about that. Tak­ing steps to try to address that trend is an incred­i­bly impor­tant step forward.” 

White House offi­cials today sent to Con­gress a report, “Strat­e­gy to Com­bat Transna­tion­al Orga­nized Crime: Address­ing Con­verg­ing Threats to Nation­al Security.” 

In answer to ques­tions about the NATO mil­i­tary cam­paign in Libya, Mullen said many coun­tries are work­ing togeth­er in a way he believes will lead to the removal of Libyan leader Moam­mar Gad­hafi from power. 

Mullen acknowl­edged that Gadhafi’s forces have adjust­ed to NATO’s oppo­si­tion tac­tics, “and that’s not a surprise.” 

But, the chair­man said, “In the long run, it’s a strat­e­gy which will work” with respect to remov­ing Gad­hafi from power. 

There has been no deci­sion by the Unit­ed States to arm the Libyan oppo­si­tion move­ment, Mullen said, and NATO forces have suc­ceed­ed in chip­ping away at Gadhafi’s forces through attrition. 

Asked about U.S. mil­i­tary-to-mil­i­tary rela­tions with Chi­na, and how it is affect­ed by U.S. sup­port for Tai­wan, Mullen said he expects a pres­i­den­tial deci­sion by Oct. 1 as to whether the Unit­ed States will again sell arms to Tai­wan, risk­ing its rela­tion­ship with Chi­na. It’s an issue he has dis­cussed recent­ly with his Chi­nese coun­ter­part, Gen. Chen Bingde, he said. 

Clear­ly, the Chi­nese would strong­ly pre­fer we stop doing this,” he said. “My point is, we have a rela­tion­ship and a respon­si­bil­i­ty, and there are legal respon­si­bil­i­ties in my coun­try to sup­port the Tai­wan Rela­tions Act. … I would hope that in the future when we come up against these very dif­fi­cult issues, we are able to sus­tain the mil­i­tary rela­tions that have been renewed and have the abil­i­ty to com­mu­ni­cate with each oth­er. Ter­mi­nat­ing that, even tem­porar­i­ly, has a sig­nif­i­cant down­side for sta­bil­i­ty in the region.” 

Asked by a Pak­istani jour­nal­ist about U.S. mil­i­tary rela­tions with Pak­istan, the chair­man said there is a “recal­i­brat­ing” of rela­tions there, as reflect­ed in a recent deci­sion to defer $800 mil­lion in U.S. fund­ing to the Pak­istani military. 

Still, he said U.S. fund­ing con­tin­ues to flow freely for civil­ian assis­tance in Pak­istan and he believes both sides want to con­tin­ue their rela­tion­ship to sus­tain sta­bil­i­ty in the region. 

We are in a very dif­fi­cult time right now,” he said. “That said, I don’t believe we’re close to sev­er­ing [rela­tions], and we should­n’t do that. Sus­tain­ing this rela­tion­ship is crit­i­cal. We’ve been through dif­fi­cult times with them in the past and we should see this dif­fi­cult time through in sus­tain­ing this rela­tion­ship over time.” 

Asked about mis­sile defense in Europe, the admi­ral said, “We’re in dis­cus­sions with an awful lot of coun­tries,” and much is unre­solved in terms of time, place and cost. 

Also, he said, “vig­or­ous dis­cus­sion” between U.S. and Russ­ian offi­cials over mis­sile defense is ongo­ing. “There are areas where we agree and dis­agree, but we’re going to con­tin­ue to work on it.” 

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefence.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →