Military Medicine Works on Managing Pain

WASHINGTON — Mil­i­tary med­i­cine is seek­ing addi­tion­al ways to help patients man­age their pain instead of just pre­scrib­ing pow­er­ful drugs, the chief of staff of the Army’s pain man­age­ment task force said here today.

Col. Kevin Gal­loway told the Defense Writ­ers Group that the mil­i­tary had to start look­ing at pain com­pre­hen­sive­ly.

“We were always asked how pain relat­ed to sol­dier sui­cides, to drug abuse, and so on,” said Gal­loway — a reg­is­tered nurse. “As we looked at our strat­e­gy in Army med­i­cine, very hon­est­ly, we did­n’t think it was as com­pre­hen­sive as it should have been.

Com­bat becomes a cat­a­lyst for med­ical inno­va­tion, the colonel said. “It has to,” he added. The mil­i­tary com­bat­ed yel­low fever, malar­ia and oth­er infec­tious dis­eases, he not­ed, and pio­neered use of antibi­otics on a grand scale, as well as the use of blood prod­ucts and plas­ma.

Get­ting casu­al­ties from bat­tle­field to the hos­pi­tal and triag­ing casu­al­ties was an out­growth of mil­i­tary med­i­cine, Gal­loway said, and mede­vac pro­ce­dures and aeromed­ical evac­u­a­tion once belonged exclu­sive­ly to the mil­i­tary med­ical realm.

But in pain man­age­ment, the progress has not been as far or fast as mil­i­tary lead­ers wish. Gal­loway told the sto­ry of Con­fed­er­ate Lt. Gen. Thomas “Stonewall” Jack­son at the Bat­tle of Chan­cel­lorsville in 1863. Jack­son was griev­ous­ly wound­ed in a friend­ly fire inci­dent.

How he was han­dled was the state of the art for the time. He was evac­u­at­ed in an ambu­lance and was first treat­ed at what today’s sol­diers’ would call a bat­tal­ion aid sta­tion. In addi­tion to a shot of whiskey, doc­tors gave him mor­phine. Jack­son called the relief of pain from the wound “an infi­nite bless­ing.”

Jackson’s ini­tial treat­ment to ease his pain was a good-news sto­ry. The final result was not so good: Jack­son lat­er died of pneu­mo­nia.

Flash for­ward to 2001, and the bulk of the pain-relief arse­nal was not a lot dif­fer­ent. “It was still based around opi­ates,” Gal­loway said.

Medicine’s goal was “to knock that pain down to zero,” the colonel said. “And we can do that.” But fam­i­lies began to com­plain.

“When the kids leave for school in the morn­ing, Dad’s on the couch. The pain is con­trolled,” Gal­loway said. “Vic­to­ry for us and med­i­cine — we did a good job. But when the kids come home from school in the after­noon, Dad’s still on the couch.

“Med­i­cine is still say­ing it’s doing its job because the pain is con­trolled, but this person’s qual­i­ty of life is prob­a­bly not what they want it to be, def­i­nite­ly not what the spouse wants it to be, [and] not what their fam­i­ly wants it to be,” he added.

The goal should­n’t be to knock the patient out, but to max­i­mize func­tion, Gal­loway said.

The task force devel­oped rec­om­men­da­tions that led to a com­pre­hen­sive pain-man­age­ment strat­e­gy. The strat­e­gy uses both tra­di­tion­al and non­tra­di­tion­al pain-treat­ment options. Treat­ment with drugs is appro­pri­ate in many cas­es, Gal­loway said, but so is treat­ment with acupunc­ture, biofeed­back or mas­sage.

“The Army for the past year has been embarked on oper­a­tional­iz­ing … an ambi­tious, com­pre­hen­sive, soup-to-nuts recal­i­bra­tion of how we look at pain, how we treat pain, how we resource pain in our orga­ni­za­tion, and being part of the DOD col­lab­o­ra­tive effort on this, to change the way it’s done in the mil­i­tary health sys­tem,” he said.

The mil­i­tary is unique­ly poised to make changes in a way that those on the out­side can see and relate to, he said.

The task force had three over­ar­ch­ing find­ings from the task force, the colonel said.

“The first is we meet cur­rent stan­dards of care,” he said. “We weren’t lack­ing, but we weren’t hap­py with what was going on.”

The sec­ond find­ing is that best prac­tices occurred in Defense and Vet­er­ans Affairs orga­ni­za­tions, “but they were being imple­ment­ed and exist­ing in iso­la­tion,” Gal­loway said. “They weren’t being repli­cat­ed.”

The third, he said, is unwar­rant­ed vari­abil­i­ty. “We did­n’t have a com­mon ori­en­ta­tion across our orga­ni­za­tions,” he explained. “When you talk pain — some­times between shifts in a facil­i­ty, there were dif­fer­ences.”

Gal­loway said the mil­i­tary is look­ing to change the cul­ture toward treat­ment of pain. It will take time, he acknowl­edged, adding that offi­cials will con­tin­ue to look for new ways, tech­niques and pro­ce­dures. They also will insti­tu­tion­al­ize best prac­tices across DOD and VA, he said.

“Years from now,” Gal­loway said, “they will look back and say what med­ical ben­e­fit came from these wars and it will be this strat­e­gy on pain that is the break­through.”

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →