Jacoby: Relationships Drive Northcom, NORAD Missions

WASHINGTON, July 28, 2011 — The job of com­mand­ing the U.S. North­ern Com­mand and the North Amer­i­can Aero­space Defense Com­mand will require build­ing con­fi­dence and trust among the many part­ners involved in both mis­sions, Army Lt. Gen. Charles H. Jaco­by Jr. said today.

Jaco­by, now direc­tor for strate­gic plans and pol­i­cy for the Joint Staff, tes­ti­fied before the Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee here dur­ing a con­fir­ma­tion hear­ing for his nom­i­na­tion to receive his fourth star and become the next North­com and NORAD commander. 

If con­firmed, Jaco­by will suc­ceed Navy Adm. James A. Win­nefeld Jr., who is nom­i­nat­ed to become the next vice chair­man of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. 

As I look across the port­fo­lio of the North­com com­man­der, it con­sists of three group­ings,” Jaco­by told the sen­a­tors. “Defense sup­port for civ­il author­i­ties in case of nat­ur­al and man­made dis­as­ters, defense of the home­land, and secu­ri­ty coop­er­a­tion with our neighbors.” 

In all those mis­sion areas, he said, “com­plex rela­tion­ships are the key to effectiveness.” 

Build­ing such part­ner­ships ahead of a prob­lem “will allow North­com to play its crit­i­cal sup­port­ing role in most of those activ­i­ties,” the gen­er­al said. 

As com­man­der of North Amer­i­can Aero­space Defense Com­mand, Jaco­by would be respon­si­ble for home­land defense, mil­i­tary sup­port to civ­il author­i­ties for domes­tic emer­gen­cies, and aero­space warn­ing and con­trol for North Amer­i­ca. As com­man­der of U.S. North­ern Com­mand, he would be respon­si­ble for the ground-based mid­course mis­sile defense sys­tem, an ele­ment of the bal­lis­tic mis­sile defense sys­tem that allows com­bat­ant com­man­ders to engage and destroy lim­it­ed inter­me­di­ate- and long-range bal­lis­tic missiles. 

As a leader who has devot­ed much of his ser­vice life to com­bat­ing threats out­side of the Unit­ed States,” Jaco­by said, “I can think of no greater respon­si­bil­i­ty now than lead­ing our mil­i­tary in defense of the home­land, while pro­vid­ing sup­port to our cit­i­zens at the fed­er­al, state and local lev­els in times of their great­est needs.” 

The gen­er­al added, “I view the North­com and NORAD mis­sions sim­ply as a sacred trust.” 

The sen­a­tors out­lined chal­lenges that Jaco­by will face in his respon­si­bil­i­ties to both mis­sions. These include work­ing with the Mex­i­can mil­i­tary to help it defeat transna­tion­al crim­i­nal orga­ni­za­tions that are caus­ing high lev­els of vio­lence in Mex­i­co and that pose a threat with­in Mex­i­co and to the secu­ri­ty of the U.S. south­ern border. 

As part of the mis­sion of pro­vid­ing defense sup­port to civ­il author­i­ties, North­ern Com­mand must work close­ly with oth­er fed­er­al agen­cies and with all states on plans for emer­gency response to domes­tic disasters. 

Jaco­by must also work with state gov­er­nors and Nation­al Guard and Reserve forces, the sen­a­tors observed, to improve the capa­bil­i­ties of state and fed­er­al mil­i­tary forces to work togeth­er to sup­port states’ dis­as­ter-assis­tance needs. 

In response to ques­tions from the sen­a­tors, Jaco­by char­ac­ter­ized some aspects of U.S. rela­tions with one of its clos­est neigh­bors, Mex­i­co, and with the Russ­ian Federation. 

The Mex­i­can gov­ern­ment and secu­ri­ty forces have made coura­geous polit­i­cal, moral and phys­i­cal com­mit­ments to coun­ter­ing the transna­tion­al crim­i­nal orga­ni­za­tions,” the gen­er­al said. 

I know that we have made progress, [and] I know there’s much more work to do,” he said, not­ing that on July 25, Pres­i­dent Barack Oba­ma signed an exec­u­tive order declar­ing a nation­al emer­gency regard­ing the threat of transna­tion­al crim­i­nal organizations. 

The order high­light­ed such orga­ni­za­tions, Jaco­by said, as an unusu­al and extra­or­di­nary threat to U.S. for­eign pol­i­cy, the econ­o­my and nation­al security. 

I think that that accu­rate­ly describes the seri­ous­ness of the threat,” he added. 

In 2010, NORAD con­duct­ed the first annu­al exer­cise with the Russ­ian Federation. 

Dur­ing exer­cise Vig­i­lant Eagle, both coun­tries prac­ticed pass­ing con­trol of mon­i­tor­ing and escort­ing a sim­u­lat­ed hijacked air­craft into each other’s airspace. 

Jaco­by said such prac­ti­cal coop­er­a­tive exer­cis­es enhance U.S. secu­ri­ty and pro­mote under­stand­ing in the area of mis­sile defense with Russia. 

With the Russ­ian Fed­er­a­tion, of course, we work with our eyes wide open, but there are areas of coop­er­a­tion that are mutu­al­ly ben­e­fi­cial,” the gen­er­al said. 

Find­ing places and venues and capa­bil­i­ties where we can coop­er­ate with the Russ­ian Fed­er­a­tion,” he added, “can con­tribute not just to both nations’ mutu­al secu­ri­ty needs but region­al secu­ri­ty needs as well.” 

If Jaco­by is con­firmed in his new role, hav­ing respon­si­bil­i­ty for defense of the home­land will make the issue of cyber­se­cu­ri­ty an impor­tant concern. 

Like mem­bers of this com­mit­tee and senior lead­ers across the mil­i­tary,” the gen­er­al said, “we are rec­og­niz­ing the cyber domain as crit­i­cal to our nation­al security.” 

In the Defense Depart­ment, he added, “we rely heav­i­ly on the cyber domain for some­thing as sig­nif­i­cant and fun­da­men­tal as com­mand and con­trol but also for the … infra­struc­ture that makes the depart­ment run in sup­port of our nation­al secu­ri­ty interests.” 

The Pen­ta­gon has an “absolute require­ment” to become effec­tive in that domain, he said, with the right strate­gies, poli­cies and author­i­ties “to con­duct the full range of activ­i­ties required in the cyber domain for now and in the future.” 

The tech­ni­cal side of the cyber­se­cu­ri­ty issue is a com­pre­hen­sive issue with the Depart­ment of Home­land Secu­ri­ty in the lead and work­ing in part­ner­ship with U.S. Cyber Com­mand and U.S. Strate­gic Com­mand, the gen­er­al said. 

North­com cyber-relat­ed respon­si­bil­i­ties reside pri­mar­i­ly in the phys­i­cal domain, Jaco­by said, pro­tect­ing phys­i­cal crit­i­cal infra­struc­ture inside and out­side the Defense Depart­ment if so request­ed by local and state authorities. 

In event of an inci­dent that would cer­tain­ly have phys­i­cal con­se­quences,” he said, North­com would act as a sup­port­ing ele­ment pro­vid­ing Defense Depart­ment resources in sup­port of civ­il authorities. 

I think that all of us can imag­ine pret­ty sig­nif­i­cant con­se­quences as a result of a delib­er­ate cyber attack,” Jaco­by said. 

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefence.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →