Iran Will Be Biggest Loser When Assad Falls, Panetta Says

WASHINGTON, March 7, 2012 — Iran will be the biggest los­er when Syr­i­an Pres­i­dent Bashar Assad’s regime falls, Defense Sec­re­tary Leon E. Panet­ta told the Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee today.

Panet­ta and Army Gen. Mar­tin E. Dempsey, chair­man of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, tes­ti­fied before the com­mit­tee on the sit­u­a­tion in Syr­ia this morn­ing.

The Syr­i­an peo­ple want what the peo­ple of Tunisia, Egypt and Libya have – a chance at free­dom and a demo­c­ra­t­ic future, the sec­re­tary said. Assad and his peo­ple are indis­crim­i­nate­ly killing those push­ing for peace­ful change in the nation. The fight­ing in the coun­try is caus­ing a human­i­tar­i­an cri­sis of the first order, and thou­sands of Syr­i­ans are flee­ing from the coun­try to Jor­dan, Iraq and Turkey.

A sta­ble Syr­ia is vital to the Mid­dle East and the world, Panet­ta said. “But per­haps most notably, Syr­ia is a piv­otal coun­try for Iran,” the sec­re­tary said. “Syr­ia is Iran’s only state ally in the region and is cru­cial to Iran’s efforts to sup­port those mil­i­tants through­out the region who threat­en Israel and threat­en region­al sta­bil­i­ty.”

The unrest in Syr­ia already has weak­ened Iran’s posi­tion in the Mid­dle East, and it will be fur­ther weak­ened if the regime falls, the sec­re­tary said. “As groups such as Hamas dis­tance them­selves from the Assad regime, Iran is quick­ly becom­ing the Assad regime’s lone backer,” he added. “This shows the world the hypocrisy of Tehran.”

Panet­ta told the sen­a­tors that the Unit­ed States is on the side of the Syr­i­an peo­ple. “They must know that the inter­na­tion­al com­mu­ni­ty has not under­es­ti­mat­ed either their suf­fer­ing or their impa­tience,” he said. “We all wish there was a clear and unam­bigu­ous way for­ward to direct­ly influ­ence the events in Syr­ia. That, unfor­tu­nate­ly, is not the case.”

The only clear path is for the inter­na­tion­al com­mu­ni­ty to act as one against the regime, the sec­re­tary said.

Dempsey told the pan­el that Syria’s inter­nal con­vul­sions are hav­ing con­se­quences. In addi­tion to the refugee prob­lem, the gen­er­al said, “we also need to be alert to the move­ment of extrem­ists and oth­er hos­tile actors seek­ing to exploit the sit­u­a­tion.”

“And we need to be espe­cial­ly alert to the fate of Syria’s chem­i­cal and bio­log­i­cal weapons,” the chair­man added. “They must stay exact­ly where they are.”

The U.S. mil­i­tary role to date has been lim­it­ed to shar­ing infor­ma­tion with region­al part­ners, Dempsey said. “But, should we be called on to help secure U.S. inter­ests in oth­er ways, we will be ready,” he told the sen­a­tors. “We main­tain an agile region­al and glob­al pos­ture. We have sol­id mil­i­tary rela­tion­ships with every coun­try on Syria’s bor­ders.”

And the mil­i­tary is pre­pared to pro­vide U.S. gov­ern­ment lead­ers with options, Dempsey said. “All options will be judged in terms of their suit­abil­i­ty, their fea­si­bil­i­ty and their accept­abil­i­ty,” he added. “We have a fur­ther respon­si­bil­i­ty to artic­u­late risk and the poten­tial impli­ca­tions for our oth­er glob­al com­mit­ments.”

Panet­ta told the sen­a­tors that uni­lat­er­al U.S. action in Syr­ia does not make sense.

“As sec­re­tary of defense, before I rec­om­mend that we put our sons and daugh­ters in uni­form in harm’s way, I’ve got to make very sure that we know what the mis­sion is,” he said. “I’ve got to make very sure that we know whether we can achieve that mis­sion, at what price, and whether or not it’ll make mat­ters bet­ter or worse. Those are the con­sid­er­a­tions that I have to engage in.”

The Unit­ed States needs to build the same type of coali­tion that worked in Libya, Dempsey said.

The sen­a­tors asked Dempsey specif­i­cal­ly about an air cam­paign over Syr­ia. “We’ve demon­strat­ed the capa­bil­i­ty to pen­e­trate air defense sys­tems for a dis­crete pur­pose and a very lim­it­ed amount of time,” he said. “We still have that capa­bil­i­ty.” To con­duct a sus­tained cam­paign, the U.S. mil­i­tary would have to sup­press Syria’s air defense.

“In closed ses­sion, we do have an esti­mate based on gam­ing and mod­el­ing of how long it would take to do that, giv­en the den­si­ty and the sophis­ti­ca­tion of their air defense sys­tem,” Dempsey said. “But it would be an extend­ed peri­od of time, and a great num­ber of air­craft.”

Such an air cam­paign would be led by the Unit­ed States, at least ini­tial­ly, Dempsey said, not­ing that only U.S. forces have the elec­tron­ic war­fare capa­bil­i­ties to take down those defens­es.

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →