Intelligence Chief Describes Complex Challenges

WASHINGTON, Jan. 31, 2012 — Amer­i­ca and the world are fac­ing the most com­plex set of chal­lenges in at least 50 years, the direc­tor of nation­al intel­li­gence told the Sen­ate Select Com­mit­tee on Intel­li­gence here today.

James R. Clap­per Jr., a retired Air Force lieu­tenant gen­er­al, said capa­bil­i­ties, tech­nolo­gies, know-how, com­mu­ni­ca­tions and envi­ron­men­tal forces “aren’t con­fined by bor­ders and can trig­ger transna­tion­al dis­rup­tions with aston­ish­ing speed.”

“Nev­er before has the intel­li­gence com­mu­ni­ty been called upon to mas­ter such com­plex­i­ty on so many issues in such a resource- con­strained envi­ron­ment,” he added.

CIA Direc­tor David H. Petraeus, FBI Direc­tor Robert S. Mueller III, Defense Intel­li­gence Agency Direc­tor Army Lt. Gen. Ronald L. Burgess Jr. and oth­ers accom­pa­nied Clap­per dur­ing his tes­ti­mo­ny on Capi­tol Hill. Clap­per spoke for all agen­cies in his open­ing state­ment.

All U.S. agen­cies are com­bat­ing the com­plex envi­ron­ment and mak­ing sense of the threats by con­tin­u­ing to inte­grate the com­mu­ni­ty and “by tak­ing advan­tage of new tech­nolo­gies, imple­ment­ing new effi­cien­cies and, as always, sim­ply work­ing hard,” Clap­per said.

Still, he said, all agen­cies are con­fronting the dif­fi­cult fis­cal envi­ron­ment.

“Main­tain­ing the world’s pre­mier intel­li­gence enter­prise in the face of shrink­ing bud­gets will be dif­fi­cult,” the direc­tor said. “We’ll be accept­ing and man­ag­ing risk more so than we’ve had to do in the last decade.”

Ter­ror­ism and pro­lif­er­a­tion remain the first threats the intel­li­gence agen­cies must face, he said, and the next three years will be cru­cial. “With Osama bin Laden’s death, the glob­al jihadist move­ment lost its most icon­ic and inspi­ra­tional leader,” Clap­per said. “The new al-Qai­da com­man­der is less charis­mat­ic, and the death or cap­ture of promi­nent al-Qai­da fig­ures has shrunk the group’s top lead­er­ship lay­er.”

But while degrad­ed, the orga­ni­za­tion remains a threat, Clap­per warned. “As long as we sus­tain the pres­sure on it, we judge that core al-Qai­da will be of large­ly sym­bol­ic impor­tance to the glob­al jihadist move­ment,” he said. “But region­al affil­i­ates … and, to a less­er extent, small cells and indi­vid­u­als will dri­ve the glob­al jihad agen­da.”

Efforts to devel­op, acquire or spread weapons of mass destruc­tion, also pose a major glob­al strate­gic threat, Clap­per told the sen­a­tors. “Among nation-states, Iran’s tech­ni­cal advances, par­tic­u­lar­ly in ura­ni­um enrich­ment, strength­en our assess­ment that Iran is well-capa­ble of pro­duc­ing enough high­ly-enriched ura­ni­um for a weapon if its polit­i­cal lead­ers, specif­i­cal­ly the supreme leader him­self, choose to do so,” the direc­tor said.

North Korea con­tin­ues to export bal­lis­tic mis­siles and asso­ci­at­ed mate­ri­als to sev­er­al coun­tries, includ­ing Iran and Syr­ia, Clap­per said, and intel­li­gence lead­ers do not see a change under Kim Jong Un, the North’s new leader.

Cyber threats have risen in dan­ger, Clap­per said. “We fore­see a cyber envi­ron­ment in which emerg­ing tech­nolo­gies are devel­oped and imple­ment­ed before secu­ri­ty respons­es can be put in place,” he said. “Among state actors, we’re par­tic­u­lar­ly con­cerned about enti­ties with­in Chi­na and Rus­sia con­duct­ing intru­sions into U.S. com­put­er net­works and steal­ing U.S. data.”

Non­state actors also are cyber threats capa­ble of employ­ing dis­rup­tive, and even lethal, tech­nol­o­gy, Clap­per told the pan­el. The two biggest chal­lenges in the cyber world, he said, are cen­tered on know­ing who launched an attack and how to man­age the enor­mous vul­ner­a­bil­i­ties with­in U.S. net­works.

While some troops are com­ing home, Afghanistan remains a hot spot, Clap­per said.

“Dur­ing the past year, the Tal­iban lost some ground, but that was main­ly in places where the Inter­na­tion­al Secu­ri­ty Assis­tance Forces … were con­cen­trat­ed,” the direc­tor said. “And the Taliban’s senior lead­ers con­tin­ued to enjoy safe haven in Pak­istan.”

ISAF’s efforts to part­ner with Afghan nation­al secu­ri­ty forces are encour­ag­ing, he said, “but cor­rup­tion and gov­er­nance chal­lenges con­tin­ue to threat­en the Afghan forces’ oper­a­tional effec­tive­ness.”

To be suc­cess­ful, Afghanistan must have sup­port from ISAF and its neigh­bors — par­tic­u­lar­ly Pak­istan, Clap­per said. “And although there’s broad inter­na­tion­al polit­i­cal sup­port for the Afghan gov­ern­ment,” he added, “there are doubts in many cap­i­tals, par­tic­u­lar­ly in Europe, about how to fund Afghanistan ini­tia­tives after 2014.”

U.S. troops are out of Iraq, but U.S. inter­ests in the coun­try remain, the direc­tor said. Since the pull-out, vio­lence and spo­radic high-pro­file attacks con­tin­ue. Iraqi gov­ern­ment actions have height­ened polit­i­cal ten­sions with Sun­ni lead­ers, “but for now, the Sun­nis con­tin­ue to view the polit­i­cal proves as the best venue to pur­sue change,” Clap­per said.

Revolts and unrest have spread across the Mid­dle East and North Africa, Clap­per not­ed. Peo­ple con­fronting rul­ing elites; sec­tar­i­an, eth­nic and trib­al divi­sions; lack of expe­ri­ence with democ­ra­cy; stalled eco­nom­ic devel­op­ment; mil­i­tary and secu­ri­ty force resis­tance; and region­al pow­er ini­tia­tives all have poten­tial for exploita­tion by extrem­ists.

“These are flu­id polit­i­cal envi­ron­ments that offer open­ings for extrem­ists to par­tic­i­pate much more assertive­ly in polit­i­cal life,” Clap­per said. “States where author­i­tar­i­an lead­ers have been top­pled — like Tunisia, Egypt and Libya — have to recon­struct their polit­i­cal sys­tems through com­plex nego­ti­a­tions among com­pet­ing fac­tions.”

In Syr­ia, the Assad regime con­tin­ues to dig in and has ordered secu­ri­ty forces to fire on their own peo­ple. Con­tin­ued vio­lence “could poten­tial­ly turn domes­tic upheavals into region­al crises,” the direc­tor said.

In Yemen, although a polit­i­cal tran­si­tion is under way, the secu­ri­ty sit­u­a­tion con­tin­ues to be marred by vio­lence, and frag­men­ta­tion of the coun­try is a real pos­si­bil­i­ty, he said.

“The intel­li­gence com­mu­ni­ty is also pay­ing close atten­tion to the devel­op­ments across the African con­ti­nent, through­out the West­ern Hemi­sphere, Europe and across Asia,” Clap­per said. “Here, too few issues are self-con­tained. Vir­tu­al­ly every region has a bear­ing on our key con­cerns of ter­ror­ism, pro­lif­er­a­tion, cyber­se­cu­ri­ty and insta­bil­i­ty.

“And through­out the globe,” he added, “wher­ev­er there are envi­ron­men­tal stress­es on water, food and nat­ur­al resources, as well as health threats, eco­nom­ic crises and orga­nized crime, we see rip­ple effects around the world and impacts on U.S. inter­ests.”

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →