Gates Shares Views on Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan

FORT LEONARD WOOD, Mo., May 19, 2011 — Dur­ing a ques­tion-and-answer ses­sion here today, Defense Sec­re­tary Robert M. Gates gave U.S. Army Engi­neer School stu­dents here his view of the sit­u­a­tions in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pak­istan.
Though the cur­rent agree­ment between the Unit­ed States and Iraq calls for all U.S. forces to be out of Iraq by the end of the year, Gates said U.S. and Iraqi offi­cials see val­ue in a con­tin­ued, but rel­a­tive­ly mod­est, U.S. pres­ence there.

“I think that most of us in our gov­ern­ment believe that there is val­ue in a resid­ual U.S. force remain­ing in Iraq,” Gates said, esti­mat­ing the size of that force to be any­where from 8,000 to 15,000 troops. The resid­ual force, he added, would con­tin­ue train­ing Iraqi forces.

“They still have a lot of work to do with logis­tics and things like intel­li­gence,” he said. “They basi­cal­ly have no air defense capa­bil­i­ty. They’ve improved enor­mous­ly, but they’ve still got as long way to go.”

In addi­tion, a con­tin­ued U.S. pres­ence would be use­ful in deter­ring Iran from inter­fer­ing with Iraq and in reas­sur­ing allies in the region, adding that his con­ver­sa­tions with Iraqi lead­ers indi­cate they agree, Gates said.

But, Gates acknowl­edged it is a point of con­tention among elect­ed Iraqi offi­cials.

“Most of the Iraqi lead­ers acknowl­edge that they need a con­tin­u­ing U.S. pres­ence, but it’s polit­i­cal dyna­mite in Iraq,” he said. “The fact remains that most Iraqis want us gone.” He not­ed that rad­i­cal cler­ic Muq­ta­da al-Sadr has made a cam­paign theme out of ensur­ing the U.S. mil­i­tary pres­ence in Iraq ends, and his groups are behind increased attacks against U.S. troops, espe­cial­ly in south­ern Iraq.

“So the ques­tion that is unset­tled at this point is whether the Iraqi lead­er­ship will come togeth­er and all the dif­fer­ent fac­tions will hold hands and jump off the cliff togeth­er in terms of seek­ing author­i­ty and going for­ward with a con­tin­u­ing U.S. pres­ence after the end of Decem­ber,” the sec­re­tary said, not­ing that he believes the odds are about 50–50 that they’ll do so.

On Afghanistan, Gates said it’s too ear­ly to know whether the May 1 raid that killed al-Qai­da leader Osama bin Laden will play out to allow an accel­er­at­ed U.S. with­draw­al.

“I think we’ll have a bet­ter view of that come win­ter – toward the end of the year, in six months or so,” he said. One of the key ques­tions, he added, will be whether bin Laden’s death affects the rela­tion­ship between al-Qai­da and the Tal­iban. If that rela­tion­ship is pulled apart with bin Laden dead, he explained, oppor­tu­ni­ties for rec­on­cil­i­a­tion in Afghanistan are enhanced, per­haps sig­nif­i­cant­ly.

“And if that process were to go faster, then we could leave faster,” Gates said. “But the pres­i­dent made clear from the get-go on this, that deci­sions on cer­tain lev­els will be made based on the con­di­tions on the ground.” That will affect deci­sions with respect to July, when the U.S. troop lev­el in Afghanistan is sched­uled to begin draw­ing down, he said. Army Gen. David H. Petraeus, com­man­der of U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan, is prepar­ing rec­om­men­da­tions.

“At this point I think it would be unwise to accel­er­ate the draw­downs beyond what Gen­er­al Petraeus will rec­om­mend in the next few weeks,” the sec­re­tary said.

Mean­while, Gates said, despite some hos­tile sen­ti­ment toward Pak­istan in some cir­cles in Wash­ing­ton since the bin Laden raid, Pak­istan is impor­tant to the Unit­ed States, and vice ver­sa.

“We need them, and they need us,” he said, and dis­cus­sions are under way on how to pro­ceed.

“I think we’ve got a pret­ty sen­si­ble path for­ward in terms of try­ing to work with [the Pak­ista­nis] and take advan­tage of their will­ing­ness now,” Gates said. “They have said in the wake of the bin Laden assault, ‘Why don’t you let us do it, or why don’t we part­ner?’ That’s an offer I think we should take them up on, and I think it’s also a test of their seri­ous­ness.”

The sec­re­tary not­ed that he and Chair­man of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Navy Adm. Mike Mullen said at a Pen­ta­gon news con­fer­ence yes­ter­day that they had seen no evi­dence that Pakistan’s senior lead­er­ship knew bin Laden was hid­ing in their coun­try, and that the lead­er­ship is clear­ly embar­rassed.

“And so, this is an oppor­tu­ni­ty, per­haps, to move this rela­tion­ship for­ward,” Gates said. “We’ve had some pret­ty good coop­er­a­tion across the [Afghan-Pak­istani] bor­der between the Pak­ista­nis and the U.S., and it clear­ly has been help­ful to us to have 140,000 Pak­istani troops in South of Waziris­tan, Swat and places like that.”

As the rela­tion­ship moves for­ward, he added, work must con­tin­ue on resolv­ing the “trust deficit” that exists between the Unit­ed States and Pak­istan.

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twit­ter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →