Gates Pleased with Progress on Afghanistan, NATO Reform

BRUSSELS, Bel­gium, June 9, 2011 — Dur­ing their meet­ings that con­clud­ed here today, NATO defense min­is­ters made sub­stan­tial progress on Afghanistan and in call­ing on the alliance’s mem­bers to take up more of the bur­den of oper­a­tions against Moam­mar Gadhafi’s regime in Libya, Defense Sec­re­tary Robert M. Gates said.
In his final NATO news con­fer­ence as defense sec­re­tary before his June 30 retire­ment, Gates not­ed that he arrived here to meet with his coun­ter­parts fresh from a three-day vis­it to U.S. troops in Afghanistan.

“I shared my view that we are mak­ing sub­stan­tial mil­i­tary progress on the ground,” he said. “I also reit­er­at­ed my belief that these gains could be threat­ened if we do not pro­ceed with the tran­si­tion to Afghan secu­ri­ty lead in a delib­er­ate, orga­nized and coor­di­nat­ed manner.” 

The Unit­ed States will announce its plans to begin the trans­fer for secu­ri­ty respon­si­bil­i­ty to the Afghan gov­ern­ment lat­er this month, with the draw­down begin­ning in July, the sec­re­tary said. 

“Even as the Unit­ed States begins to draw down next month, I assured my fel­low min­is­ters that there will be no rush to the exits on our part — and we expect the same from our allies,” he said. About 100,000 U.S. ser­vice mem­bers are in Afghanistan, along with about 40,000 troops from 47 oth­er nations under the NATO Inter­na­tion­al Secu­ri­ty Assis­tance Force. 

But the mea­sure of suc­cess is not just the num­ber of troops, Gates said, but rather is the progress they have made, not­ing that U.S. forces have dri­ven the Tal­iban out of their strong­holds in Kan­da­har and Hel­mand provinces. 

“We made a great deal of progress in improv­ing the capa­bil­i­ties of the Afghan nation­al secu­ri­ty forces, par­tic­u­lar­ly the army, both in num­bers and in qual­i­ty,” he said. 

The coali­tion and Afghan forces are putting the Tal­iban under sig­nif­i­cant pres­sure, Gates said. “I have always believed that only when they are under sig­nif­i­cant pres­sure and begin to con­tem­plate that they can’t win are they then moti­vat­ed to enter into seri­ous rec­on­cil­i­a­tion talks,” he added. “I see no changes like­ly in the next six months or so that are going to relieve the pres­sure for the Taliban.” 

The defense min­is­ters also heard from the ISAF com­man­der, Army Gen. David H. Petraeus, who also was attend­ing his last NATO min­is­te­r­i­al meet­ing. He is sched­uled to retire from the mil­i­tary and has been nom­i­nat­ed to serve as CIA direc­tor. Among oth­er things, Gates said, Petraeus dis­cussed the sta­tus of Afghan forces to assume the secu­ri­ty mis­sion. “He said it is a mixed pic­ture, but a very pos­i­tive tra­jec­to­ry,” the sec­re­tary said. 

For exam­ple, he said, Afghanistan now has 11,000 spe­cial oper­a­tions forces who are lead­ing a quar­ter of the raids, with the rest done in part­ner­ship with coali­tion forces. 

“They have some very high qual­i­ty forces,” Gates said. “They clear­ly still need part­ner­ing and men­tor­ing, but they are mak­ing a great deal of headway.” 

The NATO defense min­is­ters also focused on the effort under­way in Libya, and affirmed the recent agree­ment to extend the NATO mis­sion for anoth­er 90 days. The sec­re­tary said the NATO strikes are becom­ing more and more effec­tive at degrad­ing the Gad­hafi regime’s mil­i­tary capability. 

“Although we will keep up this oper­a­tions tem­po for as long as nec­es­sary,” he added, “I did call for sev­er­al alliance mem­bers to con­tribute mil­i­tary capa­bil­i­ties so that the bur­dens are more even­ly shared and thus more eas­i­ly sus­tained over time.” 

The min­is­ters also dis­cussed a NATO sup­port­ing role for post-con­flict Libya, but in sup­port of oth­er agen­cies such as the Unit­ed Nations. 

Gates said he is pleased with the resump­tion of the NATO-Rus­sia Coun­cil. The defense min­is­ters met in that forum after a three-year hia­tus. They dis­cussed mis­sile defense and “reviewed the active efforts of our defense teams to lay the prac­ti­cal ground­work for coop­er­a­tion on mis­sile defense in Europe,” the sec­re­tary said. 

Gates told reporters he had hoped to move for­ward with NATO-Rus­sia coop­er­a­tion on mis­sile defense, but “it is clear that we will need more time.” 

“The Depart­ment of Defense remains com­mit­ted to work­ing with the Russ­ian Min­istry of Defense in sup­port of our pres­i­dents’ instruc­tions at [a sum­mit in Deauville, France],” Gates said, “and it was encour­ag­ing to hear the strong con­sen­sus sup­port at the NATO-Rus­sia Coun­cil for prac­ti­cal coop­er­a­tion on mis­sile defense direct­ed against threats from out­side Europe, such as Iran, and not against each other.” 

He said Russ­ian lead­ers are inter­est­ed in how much a sys­tem might work, the sec­re­tary said. “I still think there are those in Rus­sia who are still skep­ti­cal of our motives, so I think we just need to keep work­ing this,” he added. 

Gates said the mere fact that NATO and Rus­sia are dis­cussing such an issue shows how much the world has changed since he first came to gov­ern­ment in 1966. 

NATO is far from the sta­t­ic defense alliance that used to be massed on the Ful­da Gap,” he said. “And even though oper­a­tions in Afghanistan and Libya have exposed some chal­lenges and short­com­ings in the alliance. … I also believe there is a grow­ing recog­ni­tion that oth­er allies need to take on more of the bur­den and acquire greater mil­i­tary capa­bil­i­ties.” Gates said he is pleased with the progress this week on NATO reform and over­haul­ing the NATO com­mand structure. 

“I start­ed talk­ing about over­haul­ing the NATO com­mand struc­ture three years ago, and have been push­ing these reforms ever since,” he said. “Under the lead­er­ship of the sec­re­tary gen­er­al, and with the sup­port of my fel­low min­is­ters, we have laid the ground­work for the most fun­da­men­tal struc­tur­al changes the alliance has ever seen. 

“Although there is still hard work ahead to imple­ment these changes,” he con­tin­ued, “the tough polit­i­cal deci­sions have been made. But when they are final­ly real­ized — hope­ful­ly soon­er rather than lat­er — we will have mod­ern­ized and stream­lined NATO to address 21st cen­tu­ry challenges.” 

The alliance is look­ing at a reduc­tion of about 25 to 30 per­cent of per­son­nel. Reform looks at reduc­ing the num­ber of NATO defense agen­cies from 14 to three. That does­n’t mean squeez­ing all the per­son­nel from 14 agen­cies into the three, Gates said, but to do the same work more effi­cient­ly and more cost-effectively. 

The sec­re­tary expressed wor­ry that coun­tries will want to “pock­et what­ev­er sav­ings” emerge from the effort, and that he would like the nations to instead invest any sav­ings in devel­op­ing mil­i­tary capabilities. 

“The key is how can we do more togeth­er through pooled efforts in the alliance for coun­tries whose defense bud­gets are under great pres­sure,” he said. 

Exam­ples are the strate­gic air­lift capa­bil­i­ty that nations of the alliance have based in Hun­gary, and anoth­er is the alliance ground sur­veil­lance sys­tem. The sec­re­tary is expect­ed to deliv­er a speech here tomor­row to explain his posi­tion in detail. 

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twitter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →