Gates: Congress Must Address ‘Crisis on My Doorstep’

OTTAWA, Cana­da, Jan. 27, 2011 — The fail­ure of Con­gress so far to pass the fis­cal 2011 defense appro­pri­a­tions bill — which cre­ates the pos­si­bil­i­ty of fund­ing the depart­ment under a year-long con­tin­u­ing res­o­lu­tion instead — is “the cri­sis on my doorstep,” Defense Sec­re­tary Robert M. Gates said in an inter­view yes­ter­day.

Fail­ure to pass the fund­ing leg­is­la­tion will rep­re­sent a $23 bil­lion cut in the defense bud­get in the cur­rent fis­cal year, the sec­re­tary noted. 

“It’s the worst of all pos­si­ble kinds of reduc­tions, in sig­nif­i­cant mea­sure because it comes halfway through the fis­cal year,” Gates told reporters trav­el­ing with him to a meet­ing with Cana­di­an offi­cials here. 

The bud­get request was for $549 bil­lion, and the con­tin­u­ing res­o­lu­tion would come in at $526 billion. 

War fund­ing will not be affect­ed, how­ev­er. The Defense Depart­ment will receive $159 bil­lion for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan this fis­cal year, a fig­ure that will drop to $120 bil­lion in fis­cal 2012, which begins Oct. 1. 

The depart­ment like­ly would use oper­a­tions and main­te­nance accounts to com­pen­sate for the dif­fer­ence between the bud­get leg­is­la­tion fund­ing and that pro­vid­ed by a con­tin­u­ing res­o­lu­tion, through stretch­ing out pro­grams and mak­ing cuts in train­ing and readi­ness, Gates said. 

“Frankly that’s how you hol­low out a mil­i­tary, even in wartime,” the sec­re­tary added. “It means few­er fly­ing hours, few­er steam­ing days, cuts in train­ing for home-sta­tioned ground forces, cuts in main­te­nance, and so on.” 

The cur­rent con­tin­u­ing res­o­lu­tion runs out March 4. Gates said that if law­mak­ers don’t pass the appro­pri­a­tions bill before that date, “this new Con­gress would be respon­si­ble for a cut that’s near­ly twice the size of our fis­cal ’12 pro­pos­al, and much, much more damaging.” 

Forces deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan prob­a­bly will be pro­tect­ed from the more dra­con­ian cuts, but forces recon­sti­tut­ing or on watch in oth­er areas of the world will be affect­ed, the sec­re­tary said. 

“Depend­ing on how it comes out, as I say, it could have an impact on train­ing across the entire force, on main­te­nance, on facil­i­ties main­te­nance,” he added. 

Gates pledged to do all he can to ensure mil­i­tary fam­i­lies and wound­ed ser­vice mem­bers don’t bear any of the brunt. 

“I will do every­thing in my pow­er to pro­tect all the mon­ey asso­ci­at­ed with fam­i­ly pro­grams, and I mean that,” the sec­re­tary said. “I will pro­tect the mon­ey asso­ci­at­ed with fam­i­ly pro­grams and with wound­ed war­riors, and so on.” 

Gates ques­tioned the seri­ous­ness of mem­bers of Con­gress who are up in arms about cuts to defense in fis­cal 2012, but are ignor­ing the effect the con­tin­u­ing res­o­lu­tion will have on the services. 

“In short, talk about not cut­ting defense in [fis­cal 2012], as far as I’m con­cerned, is sim­ply rhetoric with­out action on the [fis­cal 2011] defense bud­get that’s already in front of the Con­gress,” he said. 

Gates also dis­cussed some of the con­gres­sion­al con­cerns over his pro­posed $78 bil­lion cut in the pro­ject­ed defense bud­get over the next five years. 

The impact on the ser­vices is very mod­est, he said. Of the $78 bil­lion, $54 bil­lion in sav­ings come from reduc­tions in defense agen­cies and oth­er cuts. About $14 bil­lion of the cut comes from changes in assump­tions, Gates explained. For exam­ple, he said, infla­tion is low­er than antic­i­pat­ed and pay rais­es will be small­er than the ones that were fig­ured into bud­get projections. 

“So $68 bil­lion of the $78 bil­lion don’t touch the ser­vices, real­ly, at all,” he said. “An addi­tion­al $4 bil­lion comes from restruc­tur­ing the joint strike fight­er pro­gram, and I would argue that’s actu­al­ly to the advan­tage of the ser­vices. And $6 bil­lion is from the force reduc­tions in ’15 and ’16.” 

The bot­tom line, Gates said, is that “only about $10 bil­lion come out of any­thing hav­ing to do with the troops or invest­ment funds or capabilities.” 

The fis­cal 2011 bud­get is get­ting mixed into issues that range far beyond the Defense Depart­ment, Gates said, adding that he is address­ing his respon­si­bil­i­ties to the depart­ment. “My view is these issues are not option­al,” he said. “This has to do with the secu­ri­ty of the country.” 

The train­ing cuts a con­tin­u­ing res­o­lu­tion would neces­si­tate would work against address­ing readi­ness con­cerns the ser­vice chiefs and some law­mak­ers have expressed, the sec­re­tary noted. 

“The irony in this would be one of the ser­vice chiefs’ con­cerns and one of the Congress’s con­cerns, the Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tees’ con­cerns, have been the lack of readi­ness for the full range of com­bat,” Gates said. “We are just now begin­ning to get the kind of dwell time [at home sta­tions between deploy­ments] that would allow us to car­ry out that kind of training. 

“And it would be incred­i­bly iron­ic,” he con­tin­ued, “if now that we are able to do that kind of train­ing, we are unable to do so for the rest of [fis­cal 2011] because we don’t have the mon­ey, because we end up on this con­tin­u­ing resolution.” 

U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →