Europe Remains Committed to Afghan Mission, Commander Says

WASHINGTON, March 1, 2012 — Euro­pean coun­tries strong­ly sup­port con­tin­u­ing with the mis­sion in Afghanistan despite vio­lent upris­ings there, and NATO is like­ly to con­tin­ue its part­ner­ship with Afghanistan well past the end of com­bat oper­a­tions, the alliance’s supreme allied com­man­der for Europe said here.

Navy Adm. James G. Stavridis, who also is com­man­der of U.S. Euro­pean Com­mand, addressed Afghanistan and NATO and U.S.-European part­ner­ships dur­ing tes­ti­mo­ny today before the Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee and yes­ter­day before the House Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee.

The admi­ral said he sees no rea­son to change the strat­e­gy in Afghanistan of tran­si­tion­ing secu­ri­ty respon­si­bil­i­ty to Afghan forces in response to vio­lent upris­ings that began there last week after it was learned that some U.S. forces had inad­ver­tent­ly burned copies of the Quran.

“As I look at the broad sweep of our strat­e­gy there, I am con­vinced that we should con­tin­ue with tran­si­tion­ing Afghanistan’s secu­ri­ty to the Afghans,” Stavridis said. “In my con­ver­sa­tions – I’ve had many over last week or so with senior lead­ers in the alliance – there’s sol­id sup­port on the Euro­pean side to con­tin­ue with cur­rent strat­e­gy.”

Stavridis not­ed that about 150 demon­stra­tions had left 30 peo­ple killed and 150 wound­ed. “That’s sig­nif­i­cant activ­i­ty, but it’s been very much dif­fused around the coun­try,” he said, adding that Marine Corps Gen. John R. Allen, com­man­der of U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan, has said he is pleased with Afghan secu­ri­ty forces’ abil­i­ty to con­tain the vio­lence.

“If you step back and look at the larg­er pro­gres­sion in Afghanistan, I remain cau­tious­ly opti­mistic that we can suc­ceed there,” the admi­ral said. Two years ago, when U.S. and British Marines moved into Mar­jah, there were 10 coali­tion troops to every Afghan sol­dier. Today, there are two Afghan sol­diers for every coali­tion mem­ber, he said.

Stavridis said he expects Allen will lay out a “defin­i­tive track” in mid-sum­mer for the draw­down of coali­tion forces. “It has to be con­di­tions-based as we go for­ward,” he said.

NATO Sec­re­tary Gen­er­al Anders Fogh Ras­mussen has a “high-lev­el goal” of sign­ing a long-term strate­gic part­ner­ship agree­ment with Afghanistan, show­ing NATO’s “strong will­ing­ness to go for­ward,” Stavridis said. “I think we will see an endur­ing rela­tion­ship between NATO and the Repub­lic of Afghanistan,” he added.

Stavridis told the Sen­a­tors he will pro­vide them with a clas­si­fied report on the recent vio­lence in Afghanistan, and in response to a ques­tion, said the upris­ings appear to be a com­bi­na­tion of spon­ta­neous demon­stra­tions and Tal­iban-dri­ven activ­i­ty.

The admi­ral also spoke about the impor­tance of U.S.-European part­ner­ships, not­ing that Euro­pean coun­tries have 40,000 troops in Afghanistan and lead oper­a­tions in the Balka­ns. Speak­ing to the need for a con­tin­ued U.S. pres­ence in Europe, he said, “It does mat­ter that we con­tin­ue to have Europe as our part­ner of first resort.”

How­ev­er, he said, he repeat­ed­ly has urged Euro­pean nations to spend more on defense capa­bil­i­ties. The Unit­ed States spends about 4.5 per­cent of its gross domes­tic prod­uct on defense, he said, and mem­bers of the Euro­pean Union have pledged to spend 2 per­cent of each of theirs, but only some are meet­ing that goal, with most spend­ing only about 1.5 per­cent of GDP on defense, he said.

“They should spend more, and if they would spend more, it would per­mit the Unit­ed States to spend less,” Stavridis said. “I think the Unit­ed States should press this very hard.”

Also at the hear­ings, the gen­er­al gave his assess­ment of NATO’s capa­bil­i­ties in cyber defense. “We are in the process of catch­ing up,” he said. “We have hard work to do in cyber.”

NATO’s progress on cyber is evi­dent at the recent­ly cre­at­ed Cyber Cen­ter of Excel­lence in Esto­nia, and in a com­put­er response cen­ter being added in the NATO head­quar­ters build­ing in Brus­sels, the admi­ral said. Esto­nia, Latvia, Lithua­nia and Geor­gia have had “fair­ly severe” cyber attacks in recent years, he not­ed.

Cyber defense was includ­ed in the 2010 NATO Strate­gic Con­cept, and Stavridis said he expects it to be dis­cussed at the upcom­ing sum­mit.

Euro­pean gov­ern­ments strug­gle with pub­lic-pri­vate coop­er­a­tion on cyber defense just as Amer­i­cans do, he said. “We have more think­ing and talk­ing to do with­in the U.S. mil­i­tary struc­ture as to the pre­cise author­i­ties and struc­tures” in U.S. Cyber Com­mand.

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →