EU/Balkan

The EU and the West­ern Balka­ns in a chang­ing world

Speech by HR Cather­ine Ash­ton, at the Civ­il Soci­ety meet­ing in Bel­grade “The EU and the West­ern Balka­ns in a chang­ing world”

Thank you for the invi­ta­tion to meet with you today. Dia­logue with civ­il soci­ety is an essen­tial ele­ment of the EU’s engage­ment around the world; even more so when it comes to our clos­est neigh­bours.

I am hap­py to be in Bel­grade and to be vis­it­ing the Balka­ns at this ear­ly stage of my new respon­si­bil­i­ties as EU High Rep­re­sen­ta­tive. The West­ern Balka­ns are key to the EU.

But before I turn to the EU-Balkan agen­da let me first sketch the wider con­text in which we all oper­ate. It may seem a digres­sion but bear with me as it might help to explain why I believe so strong­ly that secu­ri­ty, the rule of law, the Euro­pean Union and the need to shape our own future, mat­ter so much. None of us can afford to be left behind.

Let me begin by say­ing some­thing about the for­eign coun­try that is the most impor­tant of all. That for­eign coun­try is called the future.

Think back. Last year we cel­e­brat­ed the 20th anniver­sary of the fall of the Berlin Wall, which sym­bol­ized the end of the Cold War. Think about what has hap­pened since then. — The Chi­nese econ­o­my has grown expo­nen­tial­ly. India is catch­ing up. Brazil is a suc­cess sto­ry. And even Rus­sia has man­aged to get itself includ­ed in this group though it is a dif­fer­ent sort of coun­try. — In the same peri­od the Inter­net has tak­en off. Mobile phones are now almost uni­ver­sal. — The polar ice has melt­ed more than ever before in human his­to­ry and we have suf­fered a glob­al finan­cial crash such as we have not seen before. All these events tell us that our world is quite dif­fer­ent from any­thing we have seen before. All these events are glob­al events — also some­thing we have nev­er seen before. The scale of change in Chi­na, the inter­con­nec­tions of Inter­net and the finan­cial sys­tem are the future that we see but do not under­stand.

In this 20 year peri­od Europe has not done bad­ly. We are not com­plete­ly whole and not com­plete­ly free. But we are much bet­ter off than we were 20 years ago — at least most of us are.

I am not sure if that is true of peo­ple in this coun­try and in your neigh­bors. You have all suf­fered the worst kinds of per­son­al tragedies and col­lec­tive inse­cu­ri­ties.

These kind of trou­bles make vic­tims of inno­cent peo­ple. They arise when there is a dis­tur­bance of the state, either through war or through civ­il war.

The state is there to pro­tect peo­ple and to pro­vide them with secu­ri­ty. The secu­ri­ty of our lives, our pos­ses­sions and our fam­i­lies depends on the law. And the law depends on the state.

If you want to have some cer­tain­ty in your life you have to know which state you belong to. You have to have some cer­tain­ty that the state that you live in, where you own your house, where you work, is going to exist in 20 years time. The more cer­tain you are that it will still be there for the days of your grand­chil­dren the more com­fort­able and secure you can feel.

The inse­cu­ri­ty in this part of the world in the last years has been because of the uncer­tain­ty of states and of theirs bound­aries. For the sake of everyone’s future that has to end now and per­ma­nent­ly. I believe that we are all on the right track and that this can be achieved.

But the state itself is no longer enough in the world I am describ­ing. This is a world of con­ti­nents, not of small coun­tries. Brazil is three times as big as any coun­try in Europe. The Unit­ed States accounts for a quar­ter of the world’s GNP. Chi­na has a pop­u­la­tion of 1.3 bil­lion. India may over­take it.

In this world the small and medi­um-sized states of Europe can­not pro­vide real secu­ri­ty. That is why the Euro­pean Union is essen­tial for our future. Young peo­ple can­not be con­fined in the nar­row space in one coun­try any more. I am delight­ed that peo­ple in Ser­bia no longer need visas to vis­it the rest of Europe.

We need big mar­kets if we are going to have cer­tain­ty about jobs and our future pros­per­i­ty. We are going to need a big weight in inter­na­tion­al affairs if we want to deal on some­thing like equal terms with the USA, India and Chi­na. All of these things are pos­si­ble but only through the Euro­pean Union.

So this is the wider can­vass as I see it. This is why the rule of law, the Euro­pean Union and look­ing to the future mat­ter so much – every­where but espe­cial­ly in this part of the world. Hav­ing described the big pic­ture, let me focus more specif­i­cal­ly on the West­ern Balkan region.] To define and grap­ple with the future one has to under­stand the past.

Where do we come from?
We should nev­er for­get what hap­pened in the 1990s: the years of war, of refugees, of Euro­pean divi­sions.

Both the EU and the region have come a long way since then. We know where we want to end up – with all the peo­ples of the West­ern Balka­ns in the Euro­pean Union. And we have chart­ed the way there, with a tai­lor-made pol­i­cy and clear con­di­tions.

The core of EU pol­i­cy for the region is the Sta­bil­i­sa­tion and Asso­ci­a­tion Process. This means on the one hand a sta­bil­i­sa­tion process after the tumul­tuous 1990s and on the oth­er it is about ever clos­er asso­ci­a­tion lead­ing towards even­tu­al acces­sion into the EU.

This approach is inspired by the pre-acces­sion process and expe­ri­ences with Cen­tral and South East Europe. At the same time, it sets out spe­cif­ic con­di­tions for the Balka­ns, such as region­al coop­er­a­tion and coop­er­a­tion with the Inter­na­tion­al Crim­i­nal Tri­bunal for the for­mer Yugoslavia (ICTY).

The Euro­pean Secu­ri­ty Strat­e­gy of 2003 already put it clear­ly: “the Euro­pean per­spec­tive offers both a pol­i­cy objec­tive and an incen­tive for reform”.

It is in the Balka­ns that the EU launched its first ever cri­sis man­age­ment oper­a­tions, in Bosnia and Herze­gov­ina and the for­mer Yugoslav Repub­lic of Mace­do­nia. Ever since it has been a chal­lenge to find the right bal­ance between polit­i­cal con­di­tion­al­i­ty and cri­sis man­age­ment, between “local own­er­ship” and “inter­na­tion­al gov­er­nance”.

Where are we now?
Com­pared to the 1990s, we have achieved real progress. The Balka­ns today is a dif­fer­ent place. Slove­nia is already a well-estab­lished mem­ber of the EU; Croa­t­ia is close to con­clud­ing its mem­ber­ship nego­ti­a­tions.

The Com­mis­sion has pro­posed to start acces­sion talks with the for­mer Yugoslav Repub­lic of Mace­do­nia and is prepar­ing its opin­ions on the EU mem­ber­ship appli­ca­tions of Mon­tene­gro and Alba­nia.

Ser­bia, the biggest coun­try in the region has, as you all know, recent­ly applied for acces­sion to the EU.
Mean­while, visa lib­er­al­i­sa­tion has tak­en place with most of the coun­tries in the region, with oth­ers due to fol­low this year. We want the peo­ples of the West­ern Balka­ns to feel – and be – part of Europe.

The EU is draw­ing on all its for­eign-pol­i­cy instru­ments in this region. Mil­i­tary and civil­ian CSDP mis­sions have been con­clud­ed suc­cess­ful­ly in the for­mer Yugoslav Repub­lic of Mace­do­nia. And the ones in Bosnia-Herze­gov­ina are evolv­ing in response to chang­ing real­i­ties on the ground. In 2008, we launched our biggest civil­ian mis­sion ever, the rule of law mis­sion in Koso­vo: EULEX. At the same time, impor­tant chal­lenges remain. Good neigh­bourly rela­tions are essen­tial. Region­al coop­er­a­tion is emerg­ing but it is still at an ear­ly stage.

Last but not least, the coun­tries in the region need to do more to resolve out­stand­ing bilat­er­al issues. Many bor­der dis­putes remain unre­solved; trade issues still exist which should be a mat­ter of the past, with every­one join­ing CEFTA. Judi­cial coop­er­a­tion on fugi­tives is a real prob­lem; and the pend­ing cas­es before inter­na­tion­al courts show the depth of lin­ger­ing dis­putes and ani­mosi­ties. The way to Europe pass­es through Euro­pean ways of solv­ing dis­putes. Through dia­logue and with eyes set on a com­mon future with­in the EU.

Let me talk about some our spe­cif­ic chal­lenges now:

We wel­come Serbia’s appli­ca­tion for EU acces­sion as proof of the com­mit­ment of the Ser­bian gov­ern­ment and peo­ple to EU inte­gra­tion and our com­mon val­ues. I am pleased that EU acces­sion receives such high pub­lic sup­port.
I hope you will be able to main­tain this enthu­si­asm. As you know, the acces­sion process is a long and hard jour­ney. Con­stant reforms are required. This might be dif­fi­cult some­times. But it will be reward­ing in the end — as it has been for all the coun­tries that have joined the EU since its cre­ation. Coop­er­a­tion of Ser­bia with ICTY remains cen­tral. We wel­come the sig­nif­i­cant progress that has been achieved and hope that the next report by the Chief Pros­e­cu­tor Bram­mertz will be as pos­i­tive as the last one.

I am also pleased that Pres­i­dent Tadic start­ed an ini­tia­tive for a Par­lia­men­tary res­o­lu­tion to con­demn the mas­sacres that took place in Sre­breni­ca more than ten years ago. This is an impor­tant step in com­ing to terms of the crimes com­mit­ted and deal­ing with the ghosts of the past. Across Europe, we have learned that one has to be open and self-crit­i­cal when deal­ing with the past.

We under­stand that Koso­vo remains an impor­tant issue for Ser­bia. How­ev­er, dif­fer­ent views on the sta­tus of Koso­vo should not pre­vent us from mov­ing for­ward in solv­ing prac­ti­cal issues. In par­tic­u­lar, region­al coop­er­a­tion must move for­ward. Koso­vo must be enabled in a prag­mat­ic way to par­tic­i­pate in region­al coop­er­a­tion ini­tia­tives.

Koso­vo is an inte­gral part of the EU ’s West­ern Balka­ns strat­e­gy. The EU may have left the sta­tus issue to indi­vid­ual mem­ber states. But the EU as a whole is clear that the future of Koso­vo is Euro­pean.

We have com­mit­ted impor­tant resources in Koso­vo, includ­ing our biggest CSDP oper­a­tion. In turn, Koso­vo author­i­ties need to do a lot more to deliv­er on their com­mit­ments and improve the lives of all their peo­ple. The EU will be present, help­ing, advis­ing and mon­i­tor­ing. And we look for­ward to the day that Koso­vo and Ser­bia will have solved their dif­fer­ences.

Let me now turn to Bosnia and Herze­gov­ina, from where I have just arrived. Bosnia and Herze­gov­ina too has come a long way since the con­flicts of the 1990s. Infra­struc­ture and insti­tu­tions were rebuilt, and some of the wounds of the war have start­ed to heal. It has seen some eco­nom­ic growth over the years. It has signed a Sta­bil­i­sa­tion and Asso­ci­a­tion Agree­ment and visa lib­er­al­i­sa­tion is in reach. But numer­ous chal­lenges remain. Every­one in Bosnia and Herze­gov­ina wants to join the Euro­pean Union – every cit­i­zen, and most elect­ed lead­ers it would seem. But the spir­it of com­pro­mise to get there is plain­ly lack­ing at the polit­i­cal lev­el. Let me be clear: Bosnia and Herze­gov­ina can only join the Euro­pean Union as one coun­try, by speak­ing with one voice, and by respect­ing indi­vid­ual human rights and the dif­fer­ent cul­tures of the con­stituent peo­ples.

Pol­i­tics of divi­sion and flir­ta­tions with seces­sion­ist rhetoric are as harm­ful as they are point­less. The EU will nev­er accept the break-up of Bosnia and Herze­gov­ina; we look for­ward to see­ing the coun­try instead as a mem­ber of the EU one day, with strong enti­ties work­ing with­in a sin­gle func­tion­al state.

Bosnia and Herze­gov­ina will elect new lead­ers this Octo­ber, who will lead the coun­try for the next 4 years. This will be a cru­cial peri­od.

I have encour­aged the Bosn­ian vot­ers to think hard about what they want from their lead­ers dur­ing this peri­od. It is a peri­od where Bosnia and Herze­gov­ina could – poten­tial­ly – reach can­di­date sta­tus and move irre­versibly on the track to Europe. But this will not hap­pen if the cur­rent “pol­i­tics as usu­al” con­tin­ues. As ever: great oppor­tu­ni­ties go hand in hand with tough choic­es.

Mon­tene­gro, Alba­nia and the for­mer Yugoslav Repub­lic of Mace­do­nia are also advanc­ing in the right direc­tion. In all these coun­tries the EU worked hard to demon­strate that the Euro­pean per­spec­tive means some­thing con­crete already now. The biggest achieve­ment in that regard was visa lib­er­al­i­sa­tion. Besides Ser­bia this was also grant­ed to Mon­tene­gro, and the for­mer Yugoslav Repub­lic of Mace­do­nia last year.

The Gov­ern­ment in Skop­je is work­ing on mov­ing the coun­try towards the Euro­pean per­spec­tive.

Con­crete progress and a set­tle­ment regard­ing the so-called ’name issue’ would be extreme­ly help­ful. Alba­nia has over the years seen impor­tant progress too. How­ev­er, cur­rent polit­i­cal dif­fi­cul­ties are endan­ger­ing fur­ther progress. I must say frankly that I am a strong sup­port­er of polit­i­cal dia­logue and not boy­cotts as a way to find polit­i­cal solu­tions.

Where do we go from here?

As I said already: the EU is deter­mined that the future of the whole region lies in even­tu­al acces­sion to the EU. Progress on that path depends on the com­mit­ment to reform at home. We still face impor­tant chal­lenges: good gov­er­nance, rule of law and human rights. And bilat­er­al issues have to be solved and region­al coop­er­a­tion must be fur­ther strength­ened.

We are work­ing with the coun­tries in the region which do not at the moment ben­e­fit from visa lib­er­al­i­sa­tion to allow them to ful­fil all nec­es­sary con­di­tions to achieve this soon. Indeed, we are work­ing with the entire region to facil­i­tate peo­ple-to-peo­ple con­tacts.

Togeth­er with local lead­ers, as well as civ­il soci­ety, we have to strength­en our abil­i­ty to explain what the EU means, today and tomor­row.

We will have to recog­nise that the inte­gra­tion of the whole region into the EU will take time. But we are back­ing you up with all our avail­able for­eign-pol­i­cy tools.

Our mes­sage is clear: “the EU is with you until you are in the EU”.

Source:
Euro­pean Union

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →