DOD Works Toward Successful Transition in Iraq

WASHINGTON, June 2, 2011 — The recent Mid­dle East tur­moil under­scores the impor­tance of an active U.S. engage­ment in Iraq and a “shoring up” of rela­tions with key region­al part­ners, the deputy assis­tant sec­re­tary of defense for the Mid­dle East said yes­ter­day.
“[The Defense Depart­ment] strong­ly believes we must remain focused on Iraq in order to advance our broad­er region­al objec­tives of peace, pros­per­i­ty and secu­ri­ty,” Col­in Kahl told the House For­eign Affairs Committee’s Mid­dle East and South Asia sub­com­mit­tee.

In his open­ing remarks, Kahl pro­vid­ed an assess­ment of the secu­ri­ty sit­u­a­tion in Iraq as the Unit­ed States tran­si­tions from a mil­i­tary- to civil­ian-led effort there, and the impor­tance of estab­lish­ing the ground­work for a long-term part­ner­ship with the nation.

While ter­ror­ist and mili­tia attacks con­tin­ue to pose a threat, Kahl acknowl­edged, the under­ly­ing secu­ri­ty sit­u­a­tion in Iraq remains strong. With Iraqi secu­ri­ty forces lead­ing the way, attack lev­els have remained near their low­est lev­els of the entire war over the past two years.

“This is par­tic­u­lar­ly remark­able, con­sid­er­ing that the Iraqi secu­ri­ty forces have assumed pri­ma­ry respon­si­bil­i­ty for secu­ri­ty for the entire coun­try,” he said, “and our U.S. force num­bers have declined from rough­ly 144,000 — when the Oba­ma admin­is­tra­tion came into office in Jan­u­ary of 2009 — to rough­ly 47,000 today.”

Since they took the secu­ri­ty lead Jan. 1, 2009, Iraqi secu­ri­ty forces have “more capa­bly embraced” their role with each pass­ing month, Kahl not­ed, a role fur­ther cement­ed Sept. 1, 2010, as Oper­a­tion Iraqi Free­dom became Oper­a­tion New Dawn, reduc­ing troop num­bers and sig­ni­fy­ing the end of the com­bat mis­sion there.

The com­bat mission’s end did not, how­ev­er, sig­ni­fy the end of U.S. sup­port. The Unit­ed States con­tin­ues to sup­port Iraqi forces through train­ing, equip­ping, men­tor­ing and advis­ing, Kahl said.

How­ev­er, “we need to be clear that the Iraqis are very much in charge, and they sim­ply no longer need such large num­bers of U.S. forces to help them keep the vio­lence in check,” Kahl said.

Kahl acknowl­edged an ongo­ing threat from ter­ror­ist and mili­tia groups, cit­ing two dead­ly attacks in May. A series of car bombs mid-month tar­get­ing Iraqi police­men killed more than two dozen peo­ple, and anoth­er series of attacks by al-Qai­da in Iraq lat­er that month left 14 dead and dozens wound­ed.

“Iraq still faces dan­ger­ous and deter­mined ene­mies,” he said, “but it is impor­tant to empha­size that these ene­mies do not have the sup­port of the Iraqi peo­ple, and these attacks have not sparked a return to wide­spread insur­gency or com­mu­nal civ­il war.”

Beyond efforts to build Iraqi secu­ri­ty forces and draw down forces there, the Defense Depart­ment and oth­er agen­cies also are under­tak­ing “unprece­dent­ed lev­els of coor­di­na­tion and plan­ning” for the tran­si­tion, he said. In par­tic­u­lar, DOD is work­ing close­ly with the State Depart­ment to achieve a suc­cess­ful tran­si­tion, he added, cit­ing sev­er­al exam­ples.

The Defense Depart­ment embed­ded a staff offi­cer with­in the tran­si­tion team to serve as a liai­son and work day-to-day issues with the State Depart­ment, Kahl said. Also, he added, the Defense and State depart­ments have estab­lished a steer­ing group to review sta­tus and progress in areas such as sup­ply chain, equip­ment, con­tract­ing, med­ical, facil­i­ties and con­struc­tion, infor­ma­tion tech­nol­o­gy, secu­ri­ty and avi­a­tion.

To quick­ly respond to equip­ment requests, a com­bined equip­ping board was estab­lished in Jan­u­ary to feed rec­om­men­da­tions for equip­ment sourc­ing to senior lead­ers.

Final­ly, the Defense and State depart­ments estab­lished a team in each of the remain­ing loca­tions in Iraq to assess and address issues that may arise after these sites tran­si­tion, Kahl said.

“As one would expect with a tran­si­tion of this scope and com­plex­i­ty, chal­lenges exist,” he said, “but rest assured that DOD is doing every­thing it can to help the State Depart­ment achieve suc­cess.”

Chal­lenges aside, the nation’s ongo­ing engage­ment in Iraq remains vital, Kahl not­ed.

“We are now at the point where the strate­gic div­i­dends of our tremen­dous sac­ri­fices and huge invest­ments in Iraq are with­in reach, as long as we take the prop­er steps to con­sol­i­date them,” he said. “A long-term strate­gic part­ner­ship with Iraq based on mutu­al inter­ests and mutu­al respect con­tin­ues to present many advan­tages.”

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twit­ter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →