DARPA Effort Speeds Biothreat Response

WASHINGTON, Nov. 2, 2010 — Spurred by the 21st century’s first flu pan­dem­ic, the Defense Depart­ment has devel­oped new, faster ways to make vac­cines that could save lives around the world.

New vac­cine tech­nolo­gies not only will speed the U.S. gov­ern­ment response to infec­tious dis­eases, but also will give offi­cials bet­ter options for fight­ing bioter­ror attacks, a DOD sci­en­tist said. 

A month before the World Health Orga­ni­za­tion declared H1N1 a pan­dem­ic virus in June 2009, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency had a plan to address the cri­sis. The DARPA effort, called Blue Angel, has been work­ing since May 2009 to devel­op a surge capac­i­ty for flu viruses. 

Although the swine-ori­gin H1N1 virus turned out to be fatal only for a small per­cent­age of those infect­ed, “the need to demon­strate a response to an urgent sit­u­a­tion has­n’t changed,” Army Col. (Dr.) Alan Mag­ill, a pro­gram man­ag­er in DARPA’s defense sci­ences office, told Amer­i­can Forces Press Service. 

“We’ve used H1 as an exam­ple, a proof of con­cept,” he said. “We hope these tech­nolo­gies that are estab­lished will move on to address oth­er issues besides influenza.” 

Eigh­teen months and $100 mil­lion lat­er, Blue Angel and the com­pa­nies it funds have cre­at­ed new tech­nolo­gies for devel­op­ing, test­ing and quick­ly mass-pro­duc­ing new vaccines. 

For the largest pro­gram, called AMP for Accel­er­at­ed Man­u­fac­ture of Phar­ma­ceu­ti­cals, com­pa­nies in four states are build­ing facil­i­ties where they can quick­ly pro­duce vac­cine-grade pro­teins grown in the cells of tobac­co plants. Once they pro­duce the pro­teins, the goal is for each com­pa­ny to scale up its process to pro­duce 100 mil­lion dos­es of H1N1 flu vac­cine per month. Exist­ing vac­cine man­u­fac­tur­ers world­wide pro­duce a frac­tion of that — about 300 mil­lion dos­es of vac­cine in six months, Mag­ill said. 

Vac­cines are pro­duced in steps, begin­ning with get­ting a sam­ple of the active virus. From the orig­i­nal virus, “seeds” are used to grow the virus in hun­dreds of mil­lions of chick­en eggs — a time-con­sum­ing process devel­oped more than 50 years ago. After the virus par­ti­cles are grown, they’re puri­fied to make vaccine. 

AMP set out to speed up the process by look­ing at a range of ani­mals and plants whose cells could pro­duce high-qual­i­ty pro­teins that would work well in peo­ple, Mag­ill said. What emerged from the first round of exper­i­ments were tobac­co plants. 

“Think about walk­ing through the woods on a rainy day. You walk through on Tues­day and there’s noth­ing there, and you take the same walk on Wednes­day and sud­den­ly there’s a mush­room that’s a foot high and it grew overnight,” Mag­ill said. 

“Any­thing in nature that pro­duces a tremen­dous ampli­fi­ca­tion of bio­mass was of inter­est,” he added. “Clear­ly these weeds — that’s real­ly what tobac­co plants are — grow very fast, and that’s what we captured.” 

Plants with the fastest-grow­ing cells will be able to pro­duce more pro­teins in a short­er time for vac­cines, he explained. 

Four com­pa­nies are work­ing to trans­form pro­tein-pro­duc­ing tobac­co plants from a proof of con­cept to a demon­stra­tion of the capa­bil­i­ty. The next step will be to devel­op full indus­tri­al process­es for pro­duc­ing the proteins. 

The com­pa­nies are Fraun­hofer USA Cen­ter for Mol­e­c­u­lar Biotech­nol­o­gy in Delaware, Ken­tucky Bio­pro­cess­ing in Owens­boro, a con­sor­tium called Project Green­Vax, whose part­ners are the Texas A&M Uni­ver­si­ty sys­tem and a Texas com­pa­ny called G‑Con, and Med­ica­go USA in North Carolina. 

“They’re all using tobac­co plants, and there’s a lit­tle vari­a­tion on the theme,” Mag­ill said. “But the approach­es — what do you put in the plants, how do you infect the plant cells, what kind of vec­tors [car­ri­ers] do you use, what is the nature of the pro­tein, how is it puri­fied — all of these are actu­al­ly quite different.” 

The com­pa­nies all are mak­ing progress, he said. One of them, Fraun­hofer, already has a prod­uct in Phase 1 clin­i­cal tri­als — the first stage of test­ing in people. 

“The final tri­al will go on for six months, because we have to do safe­ty mon­i­tor­ing,” Mag­ill said. “But we’ll know whether the tech­nol­o­gy worked prob­a­bly about the end of Jan­u­ary.” Anoth­er Blue Angel project is a tech­nol­o­gy called Mod­u­lar Immune In Vit­ro Con­structs, or MIMIC, which Mag­ill calls “an immune sys­tem in a test tube.” DARPA cre­at­ed MIMIC to quick­ly test new vac­cines for safe­ty and effectiveness. 

Phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal com­pa­nies that pro­duce can­di­date vac­cines ini­tial­ly don’t actu­al­ly know if the drug will improve a person’s immu­ni­ty or will be safe when admin­is­tered. That’s why in the Unit­ed States the Food and Drug Admin­is­tra­tion requires com­pa­nies to hold a series of clin­i­cal tri­als before drugs are approved for market. 

As a phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal com­pa­ny with a can­di­date vac­cine, Mag­ill said, “all I can do is com­mit to a Phase 3 [effec­tive­ness] study in which I will have to enroll 10,000 peo­ple over the course of about three years in order to … show that my new vac­cine in this case would be as good as the tra­di­tion­al egg-based vaccine. 

“So 10,000 peo­ple, three years, $100 mil­lion,” he said. 

An alter­na­tive may be MIMIC, a DARPA tech­nol­o­gy devel­oped by Flori­da-based biotech­nol­o­gy com­pa­ny VaxDe­sign Corp. 

Each of MIMIC’s 128–by-85-millimeter plas­tic plates con­tains 96 tiny wells filled with mix­tures of human immune cells and bio­log­i­cal mol­e­cules. Each well rep­re­sents a human immune system. 

The sys­tem can pre­dict the effec­tive­ness of vac­cine addi­tives called adju­vants and mol­e­cules that the immune sys­tem rec­og­nizes called anti­gens, VaxDe­sign offi­cials said, adding that it can pre­dict dos­ing, dose tim­ing and cross-pro­tec­tion against oth­er viral strains; deter­mine the poten­cy of stock­piled vac­cines; and com­pare the effects of dif­fer­ent man­u­fac­tur­ing meth­ods on vac­cine potency. 

“It’s a very clever tech­nol­o­gy,” Mag­ill said. “I can look at the immune respons­es in the MIMIC sys­tem and tell you that this is going to work, this is going to pro­tect patients, they’re not going to get sick and it’s going to be real­ly safe.” 

In Sep­tem­ber, Sanofi Pas­teur, the vac­cine divi­sion of the Lyon, France-based Sanofi-Aven­tis Group, signed a bind­ing agree­ment to buy VaxDe­sign for $60 million. 

The full poten­tial of MIMIC — to take the place of clin­i­cal tri­als — could take years to real­ize. But Mag­ill said he has con­fi­dence in the technology. 

“Where this will be use­ful is in what we call the downs­e­lect — when you’re in the busi­ness and you’ve got five vac­cine can­di­dates and you’re not sure which one is going to work,” he said. Today, to downs­e­lect the best can­di­date a com­pa­ny would have to do a year-long Phase 1 study for each can­di­date that would cost $5 mil­lion to $78 mil­lion per tri­al. “But what if I can just replace all that by going into MIMIC up front?” Mag­ill said. 

“Let’s say I spend $1 mil­lion in MIMIC, but I get the answer in two months and that pre­dicts the vac­cine that I need to take into humans,” he said. “That’s huge. And I think the like­li­hood of that occur­ring is pret­ty high.” 

MIMIC will work in par­al­lel with AMP to test can­di­date H1N1 vac­cines, Mag­ill said, and both will com­ple­ment oth­er projects that also are part of Blue Angel. 

Tech­nolo­gies devel­oped for Blue Angel even­tu­al­ly will apply to a range of flu virus­es and oth­er dis­eases, Mag­ill added. 

“Blue Angel’s vac­cine port­fo­lio alone has gen­er­at­ed four facil­i­ties, four [tech­ni­cal] approach­es, two clin­i­cal tri­als, two [FDA inves­ti­ga­tion­al new drug appli­ca­tions], the MIMIC and a vari­ety of oth­er spin­off tech­nolo­gies,” he said, adding that it could take a decade to com­mer­cial­ize the technology. 

Such an out­come for plant-based vac­cines would be amaz­ing, he said. 

“We don’t see very often that a response like this essen­tial­ly cre­ates a new indus­try. But we’ll see,” Mag­ill said. “You still have to go through clin­i­cal tri­als … and work through all the issues. But I would say ini­tial­ly things are quite pleas­ing and some­what promising.” 

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twitter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →