Continuing Resolutions Hinder Efficiency, Official Says

WASHINGTON, March 22, 2011 — Fund­ing the gov­ern­ment through a series of con­tin­u­ing res­o­lu­tions rather than approv­ing a bud­get is “mis­er­ably inef­fi­cient,” the Pentagon’s acqui­si­tion exec­u­tive said yes­ter­day.
Con­gress has approved a series of short-term con­tin­u­ing res­o­lu­tions since Sept. 29 that pro­hib­it new con­tracts and lim­it spend­ing to pre­vi­ous autho­rized lev­els. The most recent three-week exten­sion took effect March 18 and funds the gov­ern­ment through April 8.

Ash­ton B. Carter, under­sec­re­tary of defense for acqui­si­tion, tech­nol­o­gy and logis­tics, told atten­dees at a mis­sile defense con­fer­ence here that the res­o­lu­tions have the worst effect on the department’s best-man­aged programs. 

“They were already on a razor’s edge –- that’s where you want them,” he said. “You knew exact­ly what you were doing, exact­ly when you were going to do it and exact­ly how you were going to do it.” 

Defense pro­grams planned for max­i­mum effi­cien­cy under the pro­posed 2011 bud­get have instead been sub­ject to delays and slow­downs, Carter said. 

“It wastes mon­ey,” he said. “Bil­lions of dol­lars will be the cost of hav­ing to slow down some­thing now, only to accel­er­ate it lat­er because the fund­ing was­n’t available.” 

Carter also dis­cussed the nation’s grow­ing empha­sis on mis­sile defense tech­nol­o­gy and how that pro­gram meets DOD’s strict spend­ing guide­lines. Mis­sile defense — for decades a research and devel­op­ment pro­gram at the mar­gins of the nation’s defense effort — now is cen­tral to the nation’s mil­i­tary strat­e­gy, he said. As mis­sile defense com­po­nents reach the deploy­ment stage, he added, demand now exceeds supply. 

Com­bat­ant com­man­ders in all geo­graph­ic the­aters are ask­ing for bal­lis­tic mis­sile defense capa­bil­i­ties, he said, adding they “want more of it than we have.” 

Mean­while, as the nation’s mil­i­tary bal­ances the costs of equip­ping troops at war against fund­ing emerg­ing pri­or­i­ties such as mis­sile defense, the depart­ment must ensure the best val­ue for every dol­lar, Carter said. 

“The coun­try is look­ing to us to give them what they expect, what we have on the books, what we say they need [for defense] … and not less, for a not-ever-increas­ing amount of mon­ey,” he said. “It’s not an unrea­son­able request.” 

Defense Sec­re­tary Robert M. Gates launched an ini­tia­tive in May to increase effi­cien­cies, reduce over­head costs and elim­i­nate redun­dant func­tions in the depart­ment. Carter said that as the Pen­ta­gon faces sharply reduced bud­get growth over the next decade, Gates’ guid­ance focus­es on the need for depart­ment offi­cials to “sharp­en our man­age­r­i­al game.” 

The Mis­sile Defense Agency has done “a ter­rif­ic job in a num­ber of areas” to con­trol costs, even as demand for mis­sile defense capa­bil­i­ties soars, Carter said. Agency cost-con­tain­ment mea­sures include offer­ing incen­tives for on-sched­ule pro­grams, man­ag­ing the sup­ply chain, increas­ing the num­ber of con­tracts in com­pe­ti­tion and con­sol­i­dat­ing ser­vice contracts. 

“In most ways, MDA was already man­ag­ing [accord­ing to the prin­ci­ples of] bet­ter buy­ing pow­er a cou­ple of years ago,” Carter said. “I wish all our man­agers were. Soon, they will be, and we real­ly need to do that.” 

U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →