Clinton: WikiLeaks’ Release Attacks International Community

WASHINGTON, Nov. 29, 2010 — The Wik­iLeaks release of clas­si­fied State Depart­ment doc­u­ments over the week­end con­sti­tutes an attack not only on Amer­i­ca, but also on the inter­na­tion­al com­mu­ni­ty, as diplo­mats around the globe try to solve the world’s most com­plex prob­lems, Sec­re­tary of State Hillary Rod­ham Clin­ton said today.
Clin­ton said the pub­li­ca­tion “puts people’s lives in dan­ger, threat­ens our nation­al secu­ri­ty and under­mines our efforts to work with oth­er coun­tries to solve shared prob­lems.”

U.S. diplo­mats focus on advanc­ing Amer­i­can nation­al inter­ests, Clin­ton not­ed, and work with rep­re­sen­ta­tives around the world to han­dle every­thing from eco­nom­ic issues and recov­ery to stop­ping the spread of weapons of mass destruc­tion.

“So let’s be clear. This dis­clo­sure is not just an attack on America’s for­eign-pol­i­cy inter­ests,” she said. “It is an attack on the inter­na­tion­al com­mu­ni­ty, the alliances and part­ner­ships, the con­ver­sa­tions and nego­ti­a­tions that safe­guard glob­al secu­ri­ty and advance eco­nom­ic pros­per­i­ty.”

The Unit­ed States regrets the dis­clo­sure of any infor­ma­tion that was intend­ed to be con­fi­den­tial, includ­ing pri­vate dis­cus­sions between coun­ter­parts or diplo­mats’ per­son­al assess­ments and obser­va­tions, she added.

Clin­ton stressed that U.S. offi­cial for­eign pol­i­cy is not set through these mes­sages, but in Wash­ing­ton.

“Our pol­i­cy is a mat­ter of pub­lic record, as reflect­ed in our state­ments and our actions around the world,” she said.

This is the third set of doc­u­ments Wik­iLeaks has released. The first set was mil­i­tary reports from Afghanistan, and the sec­ond release was mil­i­tary doc­u­ments from Iraq. Offi­cials of the web­site have said they will release more clas­si­fied doc­u­ments in the future.

Mean­while, the U.S. gov­ern­ment is tak­ing aggres­sive steps to hold respon­si­ble those who stole this infor­ma­tion.

“I have direct­ed that spe­cif­ic actions be tak­en at the State Depart­ment, in addi­tion to new secu­ri­ty safe­guards at the Depart­ment of Defense and else­where, to pro­tect State Depart­ment infor­ma­tion so that this kind of breach can­not and does not ever hap­pen again,” Clin­ton said.

Defense Sec­re­tary Robert M. Gates ordered two reviews of infor­ma­tion and intel­li­gence shar­ing in August. The reviews called on DOD sys­tems offi­cials to dis­able all “write” capa­bil­i­ty for remov­able media on clas­si­fied com­put­ers to mit­i­gate the risks of per­son­nel mov­ing clas­si­fied data to unclas­si­fied sys­tems. He also direct­ed DOD orga­ni­za­tions to have a lim­it­ed num­ber of sys­tems autho­rized to move data from clas­si­fied to unclas­si­fied sys­tems, and to imple­ment two-per­son han­dling rules for mov­ing data from clas­si­fied to unclas­si­fied sys­tems.

More than 60 per­cent of DOD’s clas­si­fied net is now using a host-based secu­ri­ty sys­tem -– an auto­mat­ed way of con­trol­ling the com­put­er sys­tem with a capa­bil­i­ty of mon­i­tor­ing unusu­al data access or usage. The depart­ment is speed­ing deploy­ment to the rest of the clas­si­fied sys­tem, offi­cials said.

In addi­tion, the depart­ment is con­duct­ing secu­ri­ty over­sight inspec­tions in for­ward-deployed areas, under­tak­ing vul­ner­a­bil­i­ty assess­ments of DOD net­works, and improv­ing aware­ness and com­pli­ance with infor­ma­tion pro­tec­tion pro­ce­dures.

U.S. Cen­tral Com­mand, for exam­ple, has increased insid­er threat train­ing for its intel­li­gence pro­fes­sion­als and has start­ed mul­ti­dis­ci­pline train­ing for tra­di­tion­al secu­ri­ty, law enforce­ment and infor­ma­tion assur­ance per­son­nel at all ech­e­lons.

Cent­com also has estab­lished insid­er-threat work­ing groups to address the Wik­iLeaks inci­dent and pre­vent reoc­cur­rence.

“Pre­vi­ous­ly, over­sight was done by humans and, clear­ly, there were fail­ures there,” Marine Corps Col. Dave Lapan, a Pen­ta­gon spokesman, told reporters today.

While “there are some valid rea­sons” to remove large amounts of infor­ma­tion from clas­si­fied com­put­ers, Lapan said, offi­cials are putting obsta­cles in place to mit­i­gate the leak­ing of such infor­ma­tion. “It will be mon­i­tored much more close­ly,” he said.

In mak­ing the changes, defense offi­cials are work­ing toward Gates’ call for a bal­ance between secu­ri­ty and infor­ma­tion shar­ing, the colonel said. To pre­vent leaks, he added, gov­ern­ment offi­cials are focused on pro­ce­dures and tech­ni­cal sys­tems, not who obtains clear­ances.

Lapan also addressed the vul­ner­a­bil­i­ty of the DOD sys­tem to future leaks of clas­si­fied infor­ma­tion. “I would­n’t say it is vul­ner­a­ble,” he said, “but I can’t say it won’t ever hap­pen again. There are safe­guards in place, but it’s up to indi­vid­u­als to fol­low them.”

The Wik­iLeaks post­ings have caused a chill­ing effect on who may coop­er­ate with gov­ern­ment offi­cials in the future, Lapan said. Defense offi­cials know that Wik­iLeaks still has some 15,000 sen­si­tive doc­u­ments relat­ed to the war in Afghanistan that they have yet to release, he said.

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twit­ter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →