Chief Prosecutor Outlines Military Commissions Process

NAVAL STATION GUANTANAMO BAY, Cuba, Nov. 8, 2011 — Court actions involv­ing detainees here must safe­guard nation­al secu­ri­ty, pro­tect the right of the accused to a fair tri­al and enable free­dom of the press, the chief pros­e­cu­tor for the Defense Department’s Office of Mil­i­tary Com­mis­sions said today.

Army Brig. Gen. Mark Mar­tins, chief pros­e­cu­tor, will appear in court here Nov. 9 for the arraign­ment of Abd al Rahim Hus­sayn Muhammed al Nashiri, who is charged with mas­ter­mind­ing the Oct. 12, 2000, attack on the USS Cole in the Port of Aden, Yemen. The attack killed 17 U.S. sailors and wound­ed 37 others. 

While Mar­tins said he would­n’t com­ment on this case or oth­er pend­ing court actions, he explained ele­ments of the mil­i­tary com­mis­sions’ frame­work to reporters here. 

The Mil­i­tary Com­mis­sions Act of 2009 result­ed in reg­u­la­tions intend­ed to make pro­ceed­ings more trans­par­ent, Mar­tins said. 

“The Supreme Court has said that the peo­ple of an open soci­ety do not demand infal­li­bil­i­ty of their insti­tu­tions, but it is dif­fi­cult for them to accept what they can­not observe,” he said. “That is why our crim­i­nal tri­als are open in Amer­i­ca … and it’s why these mil­i­tary com­mis­sions are open.” 

Court pro­ceed­ings are trans­mit­ted via closed-cir­cuit tele­vi­sion to loca­tions here and in the states, so reporters and the pub­lic can view them, Mar­tins not­ed. There is a 40-sec­ond delay on trans­mis­sion, he added, so that any men­tion of nation­al secu­ri­ty issues raised dur­ing pro­ceed­ings can be delet­ed before it becomes public. 

“Nation­al secu­ri­ty requires a bal­ance,” the chief pros­e­cu­tor said. “There are absolute require­ments that democ­ra­cy has in terms of basic infor­ma­tion — it requires trans­paren­cy; peo­ple have to under­stand the deci­sions that their gov­ern­ments are making.” 

Issues that can’t be pub­licly dis­cussed because of nation­al secu­ri­ty include troop move­ments, intel­li­gence gath­er­ing and infor­ma­tion on ter­ror­ist orga­ni­za­tions, Mar­tins noted. 

“There has to be a process by which, sur­gi­cal­ly … [we] remove those items where lives are at stake,” he added. �

The Mil­i­tary Com­mis­sions Act also requires that any state­ments entered into evi­dence be vol­un­tary, and not the result of tor­ture or degrad­ing treat­ment, Mar­tins noted. 

The act directs that in cas­es that could result in the death penal­ty, such as al Nashiri’s, that the accused be grant­ed coun­sel learned in the applic­a­ble law relat­ing to cap­i­tal cases. 

Rules for guilty ver­dicts in mil­i­tary com­mis­sions vary accord­ing to the max­i­mum sen­tence applic­a­ble: two-thirds of jury mem­bers must agree on guilt for a sen­tence of less than 10 years; three-fourths must agree on sen­tences of more than 10 years; and deci­sion on both ver­dict and death sen­tence must be unan­i­mous in cap­i­tal cas­es, Mar­tins explained. 

The U.S. Court of Mil­i­tary Com­mis­sion Review exam­ines and decides on each case that results in a guilty ver­dict. Fol­low­ing that deci­sion, either par­ty may appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals, Dis­trict of Colum­bia Cir­cuit. The Supreme Court is the final lev­el of review for mil­i­tary com­mis­sions’ cases. 

The sched­uled Nov. 9 arraign­ment includes an open­ing ses­sion, a read­ing of charges unless waived by the accused, an adju­di­ca­tion of pros­e­cu­tion and defense motions, and a plea from the accused, Mar­tins said. 

Arraign­ments must take place with­in 30 days of the accused receiv­ing ser­vice of for­mal charges, he added, and tri­al must fol­low with­in 120 days after charges are served. 

The 120 days may be fur­ther extend­ed if the judge or defense coun­sel requires time to study ele­ments of the case, the chief pros­e­cu­tor added. 

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefence.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →