Chairman Cites Surge Success, Discusses U.S.-Pakistan Relations

WASHINGTON, Dec. 9, 2011 — The surge oper­a­tion in Afghanistan is a suc­cess that has accom­plished what it was designed to do, Army Gen. Mar­tin E. Dempsey told the Atlantic Coun­cil here today.

The chair­man of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said he is encour­aged by the suc­cess of the surge of 30,000 U.S. troops into the coun­try, and by the deci­sion Afghan lead­ers made dur­ing the recent loya jur­ga coun­cil meeting.

“They indi­cat­ed they need and want and aspire to a rela­tion­ship with us after 2014,” Dempsey said., but he added that he is not ready to say what will hap­pen after all the surge troops are with­drawn from Afghanistan in September.

News reports said Marine Corps Gen. John R. Allen, com­man­der of the Inter­na­tion­al Secu­ri­ty Assis­tance Force in Afghanistan, wants a pause before with­draw­ing more forces. Dempsey said offi­cials here and at U.S. Cen­tral Com­mand are study­ing pos­si­ble steps to take after the surge ends. All com­man­ders look at rec­om­men­da­tions for future actions through the lens of today’s expe­ri­ences, Dempsey said.

“If mis­sions change, if we estab­lish mile­stones, if we reassess and make any changes, then a com­man­der will do what he does,” Dempsey said. “He’ll say, ‘OK, if you want me to do that, here’s the troops-to-task analysis.’ ”

Marine Corps Gen. James N. Mat­tis, Cent­com com­man­der, and Allen are in con­stant con­tact, Dempsey said, and they keep each oth­er informed of any changes to their strategies.

Dempsey said he also wants to ensure that Amer­i­can and NATO forces are not hold­ing on to the mis­sion due to an excess of cau­tion over turn­ing secu­ri­ty respon­si­bil­i­ty over to the Afghans.

“We hold on to the bicy­cle seat some­times a lit­tle too long,” the gen­er­al said, mean­ing that like a con­cerned Dad, some­times a per­son just has to let a child ride the bike alone. All this will influ­ence the timetable for troop with­drawals from Afghanistan, the chair­man said.

Mean­while, a Nov. 26 bor­der inci­dent in which NATO fire killed 24 Pak­istani sol­diers near a bor­der cross­ing has inflamed already raw nerves inside Pak­istan, the chair­man said, and U.S.-Pakistani mil­i­tary-to-mil­i­tary rela­tions “are a mess.”

“I can absolute­ly say that it was­n’t some­thing that we did inten­tion­al­ly,” Dempsey said of the bor­der inci­dent. “Regret­tably, the Pak­istani mil­i­tary believes we did. We did not attack a Pak­istan mil­i­tary bor­der post inten­tion­al­ly. If you think we did, I’d have to ask you what in the world you’d think we would gain by doing that.”

Dempsey said he has spo­ken with Pak­istani Chief of Army Staff Gen. Ash­faq Parvez Kayani. Oth­er senior U.S. offi­cials have also spo­ken to their Pak­istani coun­ter­parts, urg­ing restraint and patience to let an inquiry board look into the inci­dent and present its find­ings, he said.

The Unit­ed States has invit­ed Pak­istan to par­tic­i­pate in review­ing the inci­dent, but Pak­istan has so far declined, Pen­ta­gon offi­cials said. 

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twitter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →