Body Armor Works, Army Acquisition Official Says

WASHINGTON, Aug. 18, 2011 — No Amer­i­can ser­vice mem­ber or civil­ian ever has deployed to the com­bat the­ater with defec­tive body armor, Army offi­cials stressed here today.

“I am not aware of any inci­dent down­range where the body armor failed to pro­tect against a round it was designed to defeat,” said Lt. Gen. Bill Phillips, one of the Army’s top acqui­si­tion officials. 

“There is noth­ing more impor­tant in Army acqui­si­tion. There’s noth­ing more impor­tant to our Army than sol­dier pro­tec­tion or sol­dier safe­ty,” Phillips said dur­ing a Pen­ta­gon news con­fer­ence. U.S. forces have the best body armor in the world, he added. 

The Army pro­cures body armor for all ser­vices and Defense Depart­ment civil­ians. A DOD Inspec­tor Gen­er­al Report on sev­en con­tracts between 2004 and 2006 looked at the way the Army test­ed body armor dur­ing that peri­od and what the ser­vice could do to improve it, he said. 

“All of the rec­om­men­da­tions from that report have been imple­ment­ed,” Phillips said. “We won’t come to full clo­sure until Octo­ber this year, when we fin­ish the final recommendations.” 

Ser­vice mem­bers are the best judge of the body armor and hel­met issued today, said Army Col. Bill Cole, the project man­ag­er at Pro­gram Exec­u­tive Office Sol­dier, adding that sol­diers, sailors, air­men and Marines issued the armor “have high con­fi­dence” in its pro­tec­tive properties. 

The Army will con­tin­ue to improve all equip­ment for ser­vice mem­bers, Phillips said. “We can always improve our process­es, and we can always get bet­ter,” said the gen­er­al added. “As we learn about bet­ter ways of test­ing, it is impor­tant we will imple­ment those changes.” 

Dur­ing the peri­od of the report – 2004 to 2006 – the Army did not test how body armor responds when exposed to fun­gus and to alti­tude. The Army asked to be excused from those tests so the ser­vice could rush the life-sav­ing enhanced small-arms pro­tec­tive plates to ser­vice mem­bers, Cole explained. 

The bot­tom line is that absolute­ly no one has been sent down­range with defec­tive equip­ment, Phillips said, and the Army con­tin­ues to test new equip­ment and to pull body plates from inven­to­ry to run tests. 

“Time and time again, we’ve shown these plates stop the most stress­ing bul­let in the­ater,” Cole said. To pro­tect deployed ser­vice mem­bers, he added, would not dis­close what round that is. 

Dur­ing the test, the Army fires the bul­let at the plates at a speed that far exceeds the muz­zle veloc­i­ty or the nor­mal weapon. “Again and again, they stop the ene­my bul­lets they were designed to stop,” Cole said. 

Phillips and Cole said hun­dreds of sto­ries exist of ser­vice mem­bers sur­viv­ing point-blank ene­my fire with only bruises. 

U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →