Balanced, Versatile Force Key, Mullen Says

WASHINGTON, May 25, 2011 — A reduced mil­i­tary pres­ence in the Mid­dle East, eco­nom­ic lim­its, and an increased need for part­ner­ships lie ahead for the U.S. mil­i­tary, the Chair­man of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said today.
Speak­ing here at the inau­gur­al Lee Hamil­ton Series on Civ­il Dis­course and Democ­ra­cy at the Woodrow Wil­son Cen­ter, Navy Adm. Mike Mullen dis­cussed con­ti­nu­ities, changes and choic­es com­ing for the U.S. mil­i­tary over the long term.

“Bar­ring sig­nif­i­cant and unfore­seen changes, the sheer size of our deploy­ment of U.S. forces to the broad­er Mid­dle East will decrease over time,” the chair­man said.

Con­clud­ing the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan will have far-reach­ing impli­ca­tions “for how we think about our­selves as a mil­i­tary, how we fight wars in the future and how our junior lead­ers, who have expe­ri­enced the hor­rors of war, grow into senior lead­ers and com­man­ders,” he said.

It also will lay the foun­da­tion for how the Unit­ed States pos­tures itself glob­al­ly, Mullen said.

At home, the Unit­ed States and its mil­i­tary will con­tin­ue wrestling with “a new aus­ter­i­ty due to the cur­rent eco­nom­ic envi­ron­ment and grow­ing demands for debt ser­vic­ing and repay­ment,” the chair­man said, not­ing that the defense bud­get will be flat “at best” over the next few years.

“I have been very hon­est about my con­cerns over the nation­al debt,” he said. “And I real­ly do believe it is the great­est threat to our nation­al secu­ri­ty and will dri­ve … tough deci­sions about what kind of mil­i­tary we build.”

In the com­ing years, clear think­ing, pri­or­i­ty set­ting and dis­ci­plined deci­sion mak­ing will be a tough chal­lenge for the Pen­ta­gon, the White House and Con­gress, as well as defin­ing “a clear sep­a­ra­tion between what must be done and what can afford to go undone.”

Mullen said he agrees with Defense Sec­re­tary Robert M. Gates that a small­er, more capa­ble force is prefer­able to a larg­er, less capa­ble one. But a small­er force will have its lim­i­ta­tions.

“[Gates] was right yes­ter­day when he warned us to be hon­est with our­selves about rec­og­niz­ing that ‘a small­er mil­i­tary, no mat­ter how superb, will be able to go few­er places and do few­er things,’ ” the chair­man said.

“We are grap­pling with these very issues in the com­pre­hen­sive review he has us doing,” he added.

A more bal­anced and ver­sa­tile force would mean a bal­ance between capa­bil­i­ty and capac­i­ty, Mullen said, “and I sus­pect we will need to trade some amount of force struc­ture, ser­vice redun­dan­cy and con­ven­tion­al over­match in order to retain the right amount of flex­i­bil­i­ty.”

“We owe it to the Pres­i­dent and to the Amer­i­can peo­ple to be able to give them options for the use of force,” he added.

Prag­ma­tism among U.S. lead­ers regard­ing the lim­i­ta­tions of mil­i­tary force is increas­ing­ly appar­ent and impor­tant, Mullen added.

Also in the future, part­ner­ing — which Mullen said has been a hall­mark for the U.S. mil­i­tary for decades — will move to a new lev­el entire­ly and should include engage­ment with inter­na­tion­al and non­govern­men­tal orga­ni­za­tions.

“Mil­i­tary pow­er may be the first, best tool of the state, but it should nev­er be the only one,” he said.

Such force should be used along­side all the instru­ments of nation­al pow­er, in con­cert, to the degree pos­si­ble, with inter­na­tion­al part­ners and non­govern­men­tal agen­cies, the chair­man said.

Sev­er­al years ago, Mullen told the audi­ence, he host­ed sev­er­al lead­ers of sev­er­al non­govern­men­tal orga­ni­za­tions at his quar­ters.

“One of them said, ‘I’ve had mem­bers of my orga­ni­za­tion in 14,000 vil­lages in Afghanistan since 1973,’ ” Mullen said. “Now, do you think they know a lit­tle bit about what’s going on in Afghanistan? And do you think I could use some of that infor­ma­tion?”

The U.S. mil­i­tary does­n’t have a very nat­ur­al forum to exchange that infor­ma­tion “because of who we are,” he said.

“We’ve got to fig­ure out how to bridge that to tack­le some of these prob­lems,” Mullen said. “There are pub­lic-pri­vate oppor­tu­ni­ties here to make a dif­fer­ence that we’re not even touch­ing in terms of resources that are avail­able, whether it be edu­ca­tion­al or finan­cial or agri­cul­tur­al.

“In the long run, to me, that’s the solu­tion set,” he said.

Build­ing and keep­ing the trust of oth­er states will become even more para­mount to reduc­ing our own risk,” the chair­man said.

The Unit­ed States is no longer in a posi­tion to “go it alone,” Mullen added. “And I don’t think, quite frankly, that any coun­try can do that.”

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twit­ter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →