Australia — Stephen Smith on Military Prosecutions; Amphibious Ships; Joint Strike Fighter

Min­is­ter for Defence — Inter­view with Jim Mid­dle­ton, Newsline, Aus­tralia Net­work, 18 August 2011
JIM MIDDLETON:     Min­is­ter, thanks for com­ing in.
STEPHEN SMITH:     Plea­sure, Jim.
JIM MIDDLETON:     Why have charges been dropped against the Aus­tralian offi­cer in con­nec­tion with the deaths of the six Afghan civil­ians back in 2009?

STEPHEN SMITH:     Well, first­ly, these are mat­ters for the inde­pen­dent Direc­tor of Mil­i­tary Pros­e­cu­tions but I’ve recent­ly received advice from her, so I’m in a posi­tion to give you some response. 

First­ly, there’s a direc­tions hear­ing sched­uled for 29 August, the 29th of this month. In the last cou­ple of days I’ve received advice from the Direc­tor of Mil­i­tary Pros­e­cu­tions that at that direc­tions hear­ing she will indi­cate to the court that she’s not propos­ing to bring evi­dence against the offi­cer concerned. 

As a con­se­quence of that, while it’s entire­ly a mat­ter for the court, for the mil­i­tary tri­bunal, there’s now an expec­ta­tion that the mat­ter won’t pro­ceed. She’s giv­en that advice to me and she has advised the par­ties con­cerned, in par­tic­u­lar the offi­cer con­cerned and his legal representatives. 

JIM MIDDLETON:     This has­n’t been a spec­tac­u­lar episode of mil­i­tary jus­tice. There’s been a lot of stress involved, very seri­ous charges for a long time, for the three men involved and now it’s all gone to water. 

STEPHEN SMITH:     Well, I obvi­ous­ly acknowl­edge all of that but we do have an inde­pen­dent mil­i­tary process. The Direc­tor of Mil­i­tary Pros­e­cu­tions is an inde­pen­dent offi­cer. It’s a mat­ter for the exer­cise of her dis­cre­tion, not a mat­ter for the exer­cise of mine, nor should it be. 

Once the mat­ter has been resolved, because, as I say, nor­mal­ly I would­n’t be talk­ing about a court pro­ceed­ing while it’s in train, once the mat­ter has been resolved final­ly by the court itself then I expect that I’ll be in a posi­tion to make some fur­ther obser­va­tions about the process but I cer­tain­ly don’t want to do that in advance of the actu­al outcome. 

JIM MIDDLETON:     Okay; The heavy lift mat­ter. You’ve had a num­ber of assur­ances from the Navy over the past six months or so about its heavy lift capac­i­ty. Now the Navy’s failed to deliv­er yet again. Six months ago the Kan­im­bla was to be fixed up, now it’s to be scrapped. How much money’s been wast­ed on this futile venture? 

STEPHEN SMITH:     I’m not sure that’s actu­al­ly a cor­rect char­ac­ter­i­sa­tion of what’s occurred. Yes, when I received advice last year about the lack of our heavy amphibi­ous lift capac­i­ty I made no secret of my dis­ap­point­ment pub­licly or pri­vate­ly but since then we’ve been work­ing very assid­u­ous­ly to do a range of things. 

First­ly we had to make a cold­blood­ed judg­ment, a val­ue for tax­pay­ers’ mon­ey judg­ment about whether it was worth­while con­tin­u­ing to per­se­vere first­ly with HMAS Manoo­ra , sec­ond­ly with Kan­im­bla . We decom­mis­sioned Manoo­ra ear­li­er this year and we’ve indi­cat­ed today that we’re propos­ing to decom­mis­sion Kan­im­bla .

In the mean­time, the best prospect of the three heavy lift amphibi­ous ves­sels that we had, HMAS Tobruk , has been under­go­ing main­te­nance. I’m expect­ing that towards- 

JIM MIDDLETON:     Can we be sure that it will, in fact, be sea­wor­thy though? 

STEPHEN SMITH:     I’ve pre­vi­ous­ly made clear pub­licly that at the end of this month we expect it will emerge from its main­te­nance for a short peri­od of time. It’ll then go back into a pre­vi­ous­ly sched­uled and pre­vi­ous­ly announce­ment main­te­nance to in par­tic­u­lar pre­pare it for the cyclone sea­son which always occurs start­ing around Novem­ber. In the mean­time we have been assid­u­ous about try­ing to ensure and ensur­ing, indeed, that we’ve got cov­er for Tobruk .

In the first instance we ensured we had the Auro­ra Aus­tralis avail­able from May to the 12 th August. We’ve had avail­able to us the Ocean Pro­tec­tor , a large cus­toms ves­sel, and that’ll be avail­able into the mid­dle of Octo­ber and I made it clear today that we’re now look­ing at what fur­ther options we have to give cov­er for the Tobruk fol­low­ing the mid­dle of Octo­ber, ear­ly November. 

In the mean­time, we’ve pur­chased from the Unit­ed King­dom the Largs Bay which we’ve renamed HMAS Choules . That’s expect­ed to arrive in Aus­tralia for com­mis­sion­ing in Decem­ber and be avail­able from Jan­u­ary. So I don’t think your char­ac­ter­i­sa­tion is right. It’s been a dis­ap­point­ing exer­cise but Navy, Defence and the Gov­ern­ment have been assid­u­ous about address­ing and con­fronting this prob­lem and, of course, in the mean­time we’ve had the Riz­zo Report which has giv­en us a very clear-sight­ed path­way to mak­ing sure this prob­lem does­n’t hap­pen again, as we improve. 

JIM MIDDLETON:     You are jug­gling a lot of issues at the moment; the heavy lift capac­i­ty issue, sub­marines that can’t sail, new fight­ers falling behind sched­ule, Defence bud­get slop­pi­ness and so on. Does it some­times feel like you’ve got too many balls in the air? 

STEPHEN SMITH:     Well, it’s not so much in my view the issues that con­front you it’s how you respond to them. How does a Min­is­ter respond, how does a Defence organ­i­sa­tion respond, how does a Gov­ern­ment respond? 

We have to improve per­for­mance and my own judg­ment is that we are slow­ly but sure­ly improv­ing that per­for­mance and improv­ing those outcomes. 

On the Joint Strike Fight­er, for exam­ple, what we’re doing now is absolute­ly ensur­ing that there is no risk or dan­ger of a gap in our air com­bat capability. 

JIM MIDDLETON:     Are you resigned to the fact that you will have to get Super Hor­nets now? 

STEPHEN SMITH:     No, no. I’m resigned to this approach, that we will do, in con­junc­tion with the Joint Strike Fight­er part­ners, in par­tic­u­lar the Unit­ed States, an exhaus­tive risk assess­ment on sched­ule towards the end of this year, ear­ly next year and in the course of next year I’ll make a judg­ment and rec­om­mend to Gov­ern­ment, as to whether we need to exer­cise any oth­er options to ensure there’s no gap in our air com­bat capa­bil­i­ty, mov­ing as we have his­tor­i­cal­ly from F‑111s to clas­sic Hor­nets, to Super Hor­nets and to Joint Strike Fighters. 

JIM MIDDLETON:     So you can guar­an­tee that at no point in this process Australia’s region­al air supe­ri­or­i­ty, I should say, will be jeopardised? 

STEPHEN SMITH:     What I can guar­an­tee is I will ensure that there is no gap in our air com­bat capa­bil­i­ty and I’ve made it clear both in the Unit­ed States when I was there recent­ly, on my return here and in the Par­lia­ment this week, that the obvi­ous option to ensure there’s no gap in capa­bil­i­ty is fur­ther Super Hornets. 

Now, we haven’t had to make that deci­sion yet, we haven’t con­clud­ed a view on that, but I’m not going to leave it to the last minute to ensure there’s no gap in capa­bil­i­ty and that’s why we’ll make the deci­sion next year. 

JIM MIDDLETON:     And if it does come to pass that there are fur­ther prob­lems with the Joint Strike Fight­er, how long into the future can, say, the Super Hor­nets pro­vide the kind of supe­ri­or­i­ty in the air that Aus­tralia has enjoyed for many, many decades? 

STEPHEN SMITH:     The Super Hor­nets are very good air com­bat planes and if we have to use the Super Hor­nets as a bridg­ing capac­i­ty then that does­n’t fill me with any fear at all. They are a very good plane. 

But I’m con­fi­dent that the Joint Strike Fight­er project will get up. We have a num­ber of advan­tages. We’ve cho­sen the con­ven­tion­al vari­ant and there’ve been far less prob­lems with the con­ven­tion­al vari­ants than the oth­er two models. 

Our pre-plan­ning had a lot of — had a lot of padding in for cost and for sched­ule. We’re now start­ing to run up against sched­ule. We’re still expect­ing to receive our first two planes in the Unit­ed States in 2014–15 for train­ing pur­pos­es. We’ve com­mit­ted our­selves to 14. Our Defence White Paper and our Defence Capa­bil­i­ty Plan talks in terms of around or up to 100 but beyond 14 the Gov­ern­ment will make a judg­ment and a deci­sion as time and as events unfold but the greatest- 

JIM MIDDLETON:     Will bud­get con­straints have an impact on the num­bers you buy? 

STEPHEN SMITH:     I’m not so much con­cerned about cost. There is a vari­able so far as cost is con­cerned which is unknown as yet and that is the extent to which the US bud­get dif­fi­cul­ties will see the US navy and the US Air Force reduce the num­ber of orders- 

JIM MIDDLETON:     That’s got to be a wor­ry, has­n’t it, to Australia? 

STEPHEN SMITH:     We are look­ing at that very care­ful­ly but yes, it is of con­cern but it’s not some­thing which the Unit­ed States admin­is­tra­tion or their Defence estab­lish­ment is walk­ing away from. 

JIM MIDDLETON:     Min­is­ter, thanks again. 

STEPHEN SMITH:     Thanks, Jim. Thanks very much. 

Press release
Min­is­te­r­i­al Sup­port and Pub­lic Affairs,
Depart­ment of Defence,
Can­ber­ra, Australia 

Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →