Australia — Stephen Smith on Afghanistan and ADF Capability

Min­is­ter for Defence Stephen Smith — Inter­view with Fran Kel­ly, Break­fast, Radio Nation­al
2. June 2011
FRAN KELLY: Right now though, the Defence Min­is­ter Stephen Smith joins us in the Break­fast stu­dio, Min­is­ter, wel­come.
STEPHEN SMITH: Thank you, Fran, good morn­ing.
FRAN KELLY: Yesterday’s hotel attack shows the Tal­iban is still capa­ble of strik­ing any­where, at any time, how does this attack sit with your mes­sage that progress is being made against the insur­gents?

STEPHEN SMITH: Well we think we are mak­ing progress in terms of secu­ri­ty improve­ments, not just in Uruz­gan, but gen­er­al­ly in Afghanistan, and I’ve been say­ing for some time, in this north­ern sum­mer fight­ing sea­son, we have to expect two things, that the Tal­iban will try and fight back to recov­er ground, but also we would see these high pro­file pro­pa­gan­da-type attacks, this is a delib­er­ate tac­tic, or strat­e­gy, by the Tal­iban, it’s not so much aimed at a mil­i­tary effec­tive strat­e­gy, but at the TV sets in the Unit­ed States, Europe and coun­tries like Aus­tralia, it’s just-

FRAN KELLY: And maybe the hearts and minds of the Afghanistan people?

STEPHEN SMITH: It’s to sap polit­i­cal will. In terms of the hearts and minds of the Afghan peo­ple, again I’ve been say­ing for some time, this is not a con­flict that can be won by mil­i­tary force alone, there does have to be a polit­i­cal solu­tion, a polit­i­cal set­tle­ment that requires get­ting the sup­port of the Afghan people. 

But it also requires putting the Tal­iban in a posi­tion where they come to the con­clu­sion they can’t win by mil­i­tary force, and they do have to sue for peace, and we’ve seen very, very ear­ly signs of that.

FRAN KELLY: Well, you say that we see ear­ly signs of that, but at the same time, if they can strike at the heart of the Afghan cap­i­tal as they have, it demon­strates to all con­cerned that they remain a potent force, rather than being on the back foot, as we’re told, does­n’t it?

STEPHEN SMITH: Well, it demon­strates to peo­ple that in Afghanistan, as in oth­er places, there’s an ever-present risk of ter­ror­ism, and that peo­ple can strike. Peo­ple have struck-

FRAN KELLY: But this is not a one-off, there’s been increas­ing catastrophes-

STEPHEN SMITH: Pre­cise­ly the point I’m mak­ing, but we’ve seen ter­ror­ist attacks in the Unit­ed States, in Europe, in cap­i­tals in Europe, and in Jakar­ta in Indone­sia, so first­ly there is a gen­er­al ever-present need to be wary of ter­ror­ist or extrem­ist attacks, that’s the first point.

Sec­ond­ly, we know that we are mak­ing ground over the last 18 months against the Tal­iban in a secu­ri­ty sense, they’re not going to lay down eas­i­ly, but the only way in which they will come to the table, will be when they come to the con­clu­sion they are under com­bat or mil­i­tary pres­sure, and they can’t win mil­i­tar­i­ly, and we believe we’re get­ting — we are mak­ing progress towards that posi­tion, that’s cer­tain­ly the view of out­go­ing Sec­re­tary of State for Defense Gates, and we share that view.

FRAN KELLY: Well that’s true, Robert Gates told the world that the Amer­i­cans are hold­ing talks with the Tal­iban, why on earth are they talk­ing to the Tal­iban, when the Tal­iban is blow­ing up peo­ple, Afghanistan peo­ple, and west­ern peo­ple, willy-nil­ly in Kabul?

STEPHEN SMITH: Well, first­ly, we have a very strong view that this requires a mil­i­tary strat­e­gy, and a polit­i­cal strat­e­gy, that’s the first point. 

It won’t be a con­flict that’s won by mil­i­tary means alone, in the end there has to be a polit­i­cal set­tle­ment. There’ll be some peo­ple run­ning with the Tal­iban, who will nev­er lay down their arms, in terms of rec­on­cil­i­a­tion, or reproach from a polit­i­cal set­tle­ment, you do have to deal with peo­ple who are pre­pared to say yes, we accept the Afghan Con­sti­tu­tion, we’ll lay down our arms and we will seek to resolve mat­ters peacefully. 

There’ll be some peo­ple who won’t do that, and that’s not nec­es­sar­i­ly lim­it­ed to Afghanistan, we’ve seen that in oth­er con­flicts, in dif­fer­ent places. 

But in the end, we believe that there are suf­fi­cient — that we are mak­ing progress, that we con­tin­ue to need to keep the secu­ri­ty pres­sure on, that’s why for exam­ple, the Unit­ed States, after the draw­down of their surge, will have 68,000 troops there, we’ll con­tin­ue to have 1550, but in the mean­time, we’re grow­ing the Afghan secu­ri­ty forces, army and police, to some­where in the order of 300,000.

FRAN KELLY: We just heard Can­dace Ron­deaux, from the ICG, she’s just fin­ished a report on the secu­ri­ty sit­u­a­tion, in Afghanistan, which is not all that pos­i­tive, she was say­ing quite clear­ly that the Tal­iban talks should stop, because the Karzai Gov­ern­ment can’t deliv­er a deal, it’s too cor­rupt, it’s too inept, it’s too depen­dent on the war econ­o­my. What-

STEPHEN SMITH: Well, at the same time as mak­ing progress on the secu­ri­ty front, we need to make progress on the gov­er­nance front, and both before Pres­i­dent Karzai’s re-elec­tion and after, I have said, and Aus­tralia has said quite strong­ly, we have to see improve­ments in gov­ern­ments, in cor­rup­tion, in the han­dling of nar­cotics, in the treat­ment of women and girls; that is also required. 

And on the ground for exam­ple, in Uruz­gan, we believe that we’re mak­ing progress in terms of the deliv­ery of ser­vices, and try­ing to pro­vide an envi­ron­ment where the peo­ple of Afghanistan can get on with their ordi­nary, every-day lives. 

So yes, progress does have to be made on the secu­ri­ty front, but I strong­ly dis­agree with the notion that there should not be efforts to bring about a polit­i­cal set­tle­ment. Yes- FRAN KELLY: So you, the Aus­tralian Defence Min­is­ter, feel com­fort­able with the notion of peace talks between the Taliban-

STEPHEN SMITH: Well, not just com­fort­able, we have been say­ing for some con­sid­er­able peri­od, there’ve been a range of inter­na­tion­al con­fer­ences on Afghanistan, the Lis­bon Sum­mit the most note­wor­thy in recent times that the Prime Min­is­ter and I attend­ed, where the inter­na­tion­al com­mu­ni­ty com­mit­ted itself to tran­si­tion by 2014. 

But a cou­ple of years ago there was an inter­na­tion­al con­fer­ence in Lon­don, where the inter­na­tion­al com­mu­ni­ty also com­mit­ted itself to notions of rein­te­gra­tion, rec­on­cil­i­a­tion and reproach, in the end they have to be led by the Afghan Gov­ern­ment, rather than oth­er coun­tries, but we strong­ly sup­port efforts to bring about a polit­i­cal settlement.

FRAN KELLY: ‑It’s 11 min­utes to eight, on Radio Nation­al Break­fast. Our guest this morn­ing in the Break­fast stu­dio is Defence Min­is­ter, Stephen Smith.

Min­is­ter, back home, the prob­lems pil­ing up in your depart­ment, we have the Skype sex scan­dal at ADFA, the sex­u­al harass­ment on board HMAS Suc­cess, sig­nif­i­cant delays in major hard­ware acqui­si­tions, the com­plete inop­er­abil­i­ty of the Navy’s amphibi­ous fleet dur­ing Cyclone Yasi, which you clear­ly weren’t hap­py about. 

Defence ana­lyst, Mark Thom­son, from the Aus­tralian Strate­gic Pol­i­cy Insti­tute, said in a report this week that if Australia’s defence mat­ters at all, if armed forces — if armed force has any role in pro­tect­ing our inter­ests in this cen­tu­ry, the present sit­u­a­tion is beyond tolerable.

You’re the Min­is­ter of Defence, can you tol­er­ate it?

STEPHEN SMITH: Well, I’ve made it crys­tal clear from the first moment I became Min­is­ter for Defence, that there has to be reform and I repeat­ed that yes­ter­day at a Defence and Indus­try Con­fer­ence in Ade­laide, and we are rolling out our reform program. 

There has to be improve­ment in acqui­si­tion and capa­bil­i­ty, there has to be improve­ment in cul­tur­al issues and matters.

There’s also very much a lag effect. We are now find­ing that in projects that we’re deal­ing with in terms of capa­bil­i­ty devel­op­ment, that projects that have been sub­ject to the reforms that we have insti­tut­ed, for exam­ple, the Mor­timer Reforms, we’re find­ing a 20 to 25 per cent improve­ment on slip­page of time in par­tic­u­lar, but also cost. 

So we are mak­ing inroads and improve­ments, but there is a long way to go, and in the near future, I’ll be rolling out fur­ther reforms off the back of the Riz­zo Report into our amphibi­ous fleet, and also the so-called Black Review into Accountability. 

FRAN KELLY: What reforms, because the Department’s Sec­re­tary, Ian Watt, said yes­ter­day at that same con­fer­ence, I think, that the aver­age pro­gram where equip­ment is made for the Depart­ment, for the ADF, for the Defence Depart­ment, is on aver­age 60 per cent behind sched­ule? What are you offer­ing or threat­en­ing to try and change that?

STEPHEN SMITH: The point that Ian was mak­ing yes­ter­day, is that if you buy some­thing off-the-shelf, it’s low­est risk, if you pro­duce it your­self, it’s high­est risk, and so where you buy some­thing off-the-shelf-

FRAN KELLY: High risk is one thing, 60 per cent behind schedule?

STEPHEN SMITH: Well, it’s not accept­able but the point I’m mak­ing, you buy some­thing off-the-shelf, like a C17, or you buy some­thing which is a proven capa­bil­i­ty, like a Bush­mas­ter, then you have less risk, and you can get the thing into the field, with less delays than high risk mat­ters which you pro­duce yourself. 

And so we’ve made it crys­tal clear that every time we have a capa­bil­i­ty, we need to have that assessed, as against an off-the-shelf item.

FRAN KELLY: You announced yes­ter­day a mea­sure you said Defence com­pa­nies could be frozen out of future ten­ders if they fail to meet guide­lines and require­ments on exist­ing projects. How many chances will a com­pa­ny get, before they’re off the list altogether?

STEPHEN SMITH: We intro­duced in 2008 a so-called Projects of Con­cern list, to medi­ate projects of con­cern. Now the pub­lic pol­i­cy objec­tive here is not to get projects on a Projects of Con­cern list, it’s to have a suc­cess­ful project, so I announced, with Jason Clare, our Defence Materiel Min­is­ter yes­ter­day, a range of fur­ther improve­ments to the Projects of Con­cern process. 

But what we’re say­ing is, if you’re a com­pa­ny, and you have a project on the Projects of Con­cern list, if you are not work­ing close­ly with Defence to reme­di­ate that pro­gram and bring it to a suc­cess­ful con­clu­sion, that will mark you down, if you’ve got ten­ders or bids in for oth­er projects, and it may well, in extreme cir­cum­stances, mean you are exclud­ed from fur­ther ten­der­ing until you fix that project. 

There’s an oblig­a­tion here, not just on the part of Defence to get it right, but on the part of indus­try to get it right as well.

FRAN KELLY: And very briefly, Min­is­ter, Labor’s woes in the polls, in a ter­ri­ble state, lead­er­ship is always being talked about, your name is bob­bing up, do you have ambi­tion to become PM?

STEPHEN SMITH: This is a long haul race, we’ve got our Prime Min­is­ter, she’s doing in my view a very good job, but she’s also got the right approach, which is the next elec­tion will be Sep­tem­ber, Octo­ber, Novem­ber of 2013, a lot of water to go under the bridge between now and then, we’re work­ing our way through a range of tough reforms, in the end she’ll be the Prime Min­is­ter who’ll take us to the next poll, and I would­n’t be mak­ing judge­ments about our polit­i­cal fate quite just yet.

FRAN KELLY: Do you have your own ambitions?

STEPHEN SMITH: I have my ambi­tion to be a mem­ber of the Cab­i­net, Defence Min­is­ter, mem­ber of the ERC, and help­ing Antho­ny Albanese run the House as Deputy Leader, I’m very hap­py doing what I’m doing.

FRAN KELLY: Stephen Smith, thank you very much for join­ing us on Breakfast.

STEPHEN SMITH: Thanks Fran, thanks very much.

FRAN KELLY: Defence Min­is­ter Stephen Smith. 

Press release
Min­is­te­r­i­al Sup­port and Pub­lic Affairs,
Depart­ment of Defence,
Can­ber­ra, Australia 

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twitter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →