Australia — Minister for Defence Stephen Smith on AUKMIN

TOPICS: Aus­tralia-Unit­ed King­dom Min­is­te­r­i­al Con­sul­ta­tions; Aus­tralian Defence Force sup­port to Queens­land flood relief and recov­ery effort
VIRGINIA TRIOLI: Top­ics up for dis­cus­sion at the AUKMIN talks will include Afghanistan, Chi­na and glob­al coun­tert­er­ror­ism efforts. For more, Defence Min­is­ter Stephen Smith joins us now from Syd­ney. Stephen Smith, good morn­ing and Hap­py New Year to you.

STEPHEN SMITH: Good morn­ing, Vir­ginia, and Hap­py New Year to you as well.

VIRGINIA TRIOLI: The UK is now talk­ing about a 2011–2012 with­draw­al time­line. What, if any­thing, does that mean for us? Talk­ing about Afghanistan here, of course.

STEPHEN SMITH: The Unit­ed King­dom, like Aus­tralia and the inter­na­tion­al com­mu­ni­ty, is com­mit­ted to a tran­si­tion to Afghan-led and Afghan respon­si­bil­i­ty for secu­ri­ty pur­pos­es. So, we’re both com­mit­ted to that tran­si­tion at the end of 2014.

Aus­tralia con­tin­ues to believe that we’re on track for our train­ing effort in Uruz­gan Province where we’re train­ing the Afghan 4th Brigade to take respon­si­bil­i­ty for those secu­ri­ty arrange­ments. So that reflects the NATO-ISAF Meet­ing in Lis­bon at the end of last year where the inter­na­tion­al com­mu­ni­ty agreed to that effec­tive strat­e­gy.

VIRGINIA TRIOLI: Yes, but the UK is talk­ing now specif­i­cal­ly dates and a time­line for with­draw­al. We don’t real­ly have one yet.

STEPHEN SMITH: Well, the UK has indi­cat­ed a point in time where they’re look­ing to a draw­down, and the Unit­ed States has done exact­ly the same. There’s nev­er been an incon­sis­ten­cy with a draw­down and the tran­si­tion strat­e­gy and the com­mit­ment that the Afghan Gov­ern­ment has and the inter­na­tion­al com­mu­ni­ty has to a 2014 tran­si­tion.

We’ve always known, for exam­ple, that that tran­si­tion would be at a dif­fer­ent time in dif­fer­ent places, that var­i­ous parts of the coun­try would be appro­pri­ate and right for a tran­si­tion ear­li­er than oth­ers. So there’s no incon­sis­ten­cy with such a draw­down.

The key thing is that the inter­na­tion­al com­mu­ni­ty, includ­ing Aus­tralia, includ­ing the Unit­ed King­dom, is absolute­ly com­mit­ted to a tran­si­tion to Afghan-led respon­si­bil­i­ty in Afghanistan. Aus­tralia can’t be there for­ev­er, nor can the Unit­ed King­dom, nor can the inter­na­tion­al com­mu­ni­ty. But what we do know is we can’t leave tomor­row and that’s why we’re all com­mit­ted to that tran­si­tion strat­e­gy.

VIRGINIA TRIOLI: Sure. It’s not about try­ing to point out incon­sis­ten­cies here, it’s more that they’ve got dates and we don’t.

STEPHEN SMITH: As we’ve made clear, as the Prime Min­is­ter has made clear, the For­eign Minister’s made clear, as I’ve made clear dur­ing the Par­lia­men­tary debate, we are com­mit­ted to a con­di­tions-based tran­si­tion in Uruz­gan Province to Afghan Nation­al Secu­ri­ty Forces — the police, the army and the like. We believe we’re on track to effect that by 2014.

But we’ve also made the point that as that tran­si­tion comes, we don’t see Aus­tralia leav­ing Afghanistan overnight. We believe there will be things for us to con­tin­ue to do, par­tic­u­lar­ly on the long-term devel­op­ment assis­tance front, and that view is also shared by the inter­na­tion­al com­mu­ni­ty. And that was also reflect­ed at the Lis­bon Con­fer­ence that the Prime Min­is­ter and I attend­ed at the end of last year.

VIRGINIA TRIOLI: On that score, and ask­ing you, I guess, as a rep­re­sen­ta­tive of that inter­na­tion­al coali­tion that all has the same ambi­tion here for Afghanistan, are we cre­at­ing a sus­tain­able Gov­ern­ment there? Are we get­ting the pol­i­tics right?

STEPHEN SMITH: We believe that we’ve got the strat­e­gy right. I mean, I made the point in the Par­lia­men­tary debate, and I think I’ve made it on your pro­gram in the past that, regret­tably, it’s tak­en the inter­na­tion­al com­mu­ni­ty a long time to get the cor­rect polit­i­cal and mil­i­tary strat­e­gy so far as Afghanistan is con­cerned. That was­n’t helped by diver­sion into Iraq. But we’re now very con­fi­dent that we have the right mil­i­tary strat­e­gy, the right polit­i­cal strat­e­gy and the cor­rect allo­ca­tion of resources from the inter­na­tion­al com­mu­ni­ty to enable the Afghan peo­ple, the Afghan Gov­ern­ment, the Afghan Secu­ri­ty Forces to take that respon­si­bil­i­ty. It has tak­en way too long. And when peo­ple look back on this peri­od, that will be one of the analy­ses. But we deal with the cards as they fall for us, and we’re now con­fi­dent that we’ve got the cor­rect pol­i­cy, the cor­rect polit­i­cal and mil­i­tary strat­e­gy in place to effect that tran­si­tion.

VIRGINIA TRIOLI: Yes. But still, even tak­ing account of the fact that, as you say and oth­ers acknowl­edge, it’s tak­en too long. Right now, there’s still so lit­tle Afghan admin­is­tra­tive pres­ence in the provinces that when that time comes for with­draw­al, what can you real­ly be con­fi­dent about what you’re leav­ing behind?

STEPHEN SMITH: Well, that’s not true. Across Afghanistan, as a whole, we know it is uneven. We know the capac­i­ty of the Afghan Secu­ri­ty Forces across the coun­try is at dif­fer­ent lev­els. We know the capac­i­ty of the Afghan Gov­ern­ment, both at the cen­tral lev­el and the provin­cial lev­el is uneven, but we are, for exam­ple, pleased with progress that is being made in Uruz­gan Province. We’re also pleased with the progress that’s being made on the secu­ri­ty front in the south of Afghanistan, and that’s been reflect­ed not just by what the Unit­ed States and the Unit­ed King­dom and Aus­tralia say about progress, but also by inter­na­tion­al observers as well.

So yes, gov­er­nance, gov­ern­men­tal capac­i­ty is uneven, but that’s the rea­son why we are now, and the inter­na­tion­al com­mu­ni­ty, absolute­ly com­mit­ted, not just to a mil­i­tary strat­e­gy but to a polit­i­cal strat­e­gy, grow­ing the capac­i­ty of the Afghan insti­tu­tions to take care of these mat­ters for them­selves.

And last year, for exam­ple, we saw the Afghan Par­lia­men­tary elec­tions, and one of the pleas­ing fea­tures of that was the capac­i­ty of the Afghan author­i­ties to take respon­si­bil­i­ty for secu­ri­ty arrange­ments of that Par­lia­men­tary elec­tion on the day. That was sig­nif­i­cant progress. And we’ve seen the Afghan Elec­tion Com­mis­sion there and the Afghan Elec­tion Com­plaints Com­mis­sion also tak­ing respon­si­bil­i­ty for those mat­ters. But we, obvi­ous­ly, acknowl­edge — and I’ve made the point pub­licly and pri­vate­ly to Afghan offi­cials — that we do need to see sub­stan­tial progress on these fronts: on gov­er­nance, on cor­rup­tion, on the treat­ment of women and girls, on gov­er­nance, cor­rup­tion mat­ters, nar­cotics and the like.

Yes, it’s clear that a lot of progress needs to be made on these fronts, and that is very impor­tant to, ulti­mate­ly, suc­cess in Afghanistan and mak­ing sure that Afghanistan does­n’t again become a breed­ing ground for inter­na­tion­al ter­ror­ism.

VIRGINIA TRIOLI: Min­is­ter Smith, turn­ing now to Chi­na, it’s been described, of course, as a great pow­er that wants a great armed force to go with that. Does the UK and Aus­tralia have a sim­i­lar view in regard of that ambi­tion?

STEPHEN SMITH: We know that this is the cen­tu­ry of the Asia-Pacif­ic, and one of the rea­sons that For­eign Sec­re­tary Hague and Defence Sec­re­tary Fox are com­ing to Aus­tralia is to send the mes­sage that that influ­ence, that eco­nom­ic growth, polit­i­cal growth, mil­i­tary growth influ­ence is mov­ing to our part of the world. Yes, a lot of that is about the rise of Chi­na, but it’s also the rise of India, the rise of the ASEAN economies com­bined.

On the Chi­nese mil­i­tary front, we absolute­ly accept, as does the inter­na­tion­al com­mu­ni­ty, that as Chi­na grows, as its econ­o­my grows, it’s enti­tled to grow its mil­i­tary capac­i­ty.

What we do say to Chi­na, as we say again when we meet with them for­mal­ly, but as we also say pub­licly, all we expect from Chi­na is that they are trans­par­ent about their mil­i­tary strat­e­gy. And we were very pleased recent­ly to see what we regard­ed as a suc­cess­ful vis­it by US Defense Sec­re­tary Gates to Chi­na. It’s very impor­tant that not only is there eco­nom­ic and polit­i­cal coop­er­a­tion between Chi­na and the Unit­ed States, but also defence and mil­i­tary coop­er­a­tion.

VIRGINIA TRIOLI: Min­is­ter, I know you’re under pres­sure and I’ve got to let you go, but just very quick­ly, does the Defence Force have any more capac­i­ty to spare if Queens­land needs even more help with the clean up of these mon­strous floods?

STEPHEN SMITH: Well, we’ve com­mit­ted our­selves to 1200 per­son­nel on the ground deal­ing with the clean up and the ear­ly stages of recov­ery, but we’re also see­ing a tran­si­tion.

Today, as we speak, we’ve got around 1600 peo­ple on the ground there, some con­tin­u­ing to do the search and res­cue and recov­ery effort, par­tic­u­lar­ly in the Lock­y­er Val­ley, some con­tin­u­ing to engage in trans­porta­tion. But the vast bulk are now engaged in the clean up in Bris­bane and Ipswich and the ear­ly stages of recov­ery.

So we’re very con­fi­dent that we’ve got the right resources on the ground. That will even­tu­al­ly, over the peri­od of the next few days and weeks, come down to around 1200. But as we’ve made clear, what­ev­er is required, we’ve got the capac­i­ty to do it. And I’m very pleased with the ter­rif­ic work that Defence Force per­son­nel have been doing in Queens­land gen­er­al­ly all of this year. It’s been a ter­rif­ic effort on their part, and we’re very pleased and proud of the effort they’ve been mak­ing.

VIRGINIA TRIOLI: Stephen Smith, good to talk to you again, thanks so much.

STEPHEN SMITH: Thanks very much, Vir­ginia, thank you.

Press release
Min­is­te­r­i­al Sup­port and Pub­lic Affairs,
Depart­ment of Defence,
Can­ber­ra, Aus­tralia

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twit­ter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →