Australia — Defence Minister Stephen Smith interviewed by Jim Middleton

JIM MIDDLETON: Australia’s Navy is respon­si­ble for inter­cept­ing peo­ple smug­glers try­ing to get asy­lum seek­ers to Aus­tralia. The ques­tion is whether the Navy will now be able to cope if today’s deci­sion encour­ages more peo­ple to take the risky trip south. Stephen Smith is Australia’s Defence Min­is­ter. Defence Min­is­ter, wel­come to the pro­gram.

STEPHEN SMITH: Plea­sure Jim.

JIM MIDDLETON: The High Court deci­sion on asy­lum seek­ers has secu­ri­ty impli­ca­tions. Aus­tralian Navy patrols are already at full stretch inter­cept­ing boats to Australia’s north. Can you guar­an­tee the Navy will be able to inter­cept the addi­tion­al asy­lum seek­ers this deci­sion will encour­age?

STEPHEN SMITH: Well I don’t draw any of those impli­ca­tions. Of course the detail is a mat­ter for the Min­is­ter for Immi­gra­tion to con­sid­er and he’s made it clear he’ll bring the ram­i­fi­ca­tions to Cab­i­net. But the High Court has not dis­turbed our exci­sion of off­shore islands regime; has not dis­turbed our deten­tion arrange­ments.

It said that where peo­ple are assessed off­shore they have lim­it­ed appeal rights where there’s been a breach of law or a sug­ges­tion of an unfair pro­ce­dure. So I don’t inter­pret that deci­sion as in any way dis­turb­ing the bor­der pro­tec­tion and con­trol arrange­ments that we have in place. They will con­tin­ue. They of course have in recent times, in the course of our Gov­ern­ment being in office, have been sub­stan­tial­ly enhanced. So there’ll be no — in our view — our assess­ment, no adverse impli­ca­tions for that.

JIM MIDDLETON: We’ll move on Defence Min­is­ter. You’re attend­ing the NATO Sum­mit in Lis­bon, next week. You had talks with US Sec­re­tary of State, Sec­re­tary of Defense Robert Gates and the US Joint Chiefs of Staff Admi­ral Mike Mullen ear­li­er this week. Will Aus­tralia agree to the Amer­i­cans’ sug­ges­tion to deploy Aus­tralian forces per­ma­nent­ly in Kan­da­har Province in Afghanistan?

STEPHEN SMITH: Well, three things. Yes, the AUSMIN meet­ings we held in Mel­bourne ear­li­er this week, they were very suc­cess­ful, very pleased to see both Sec­re­tary of State Clin­ton and Sec­re­tary of Defense Gates in Aus­tralia. Very suc­cess­ful, com­pre­hen­sive dis­cus­sions.

Sec­ond­ly, yes, I am attend­ing Lis­bon with the Prime Min­is­ter where NATO and ISAF will look at the tran­si­tion to Afghan-led respon­si­bil­i­ty and the inter­na­tion­al community’s desire to see that effect­ed by 2014. In terms of the oper­a­tion of our spe­cial forces, whilst I need to be care­ful about what I say pub­licly about such oper­a­tions, we of course have got our spe­cial forces based in Uruz­gan Province.

We do allow the flex­i­bil­i­ty to see them oper­ate from time to time in Kan­da­har, par­tic­u­lar­ly North­ern Kan­da­har. The sug­ges­tion that I’ve seen in the pub­lic domain was not some­thing that we dis­cussed at Min­is­te­r­i­al lev­el in the course of AUSMIN and there’s not pro­pos­al before the Gov­ern­ment to effect that. Oth­er than that I would­n’t be get­ting into the detail of our bas­ing arrange­ments in terms of our spe­cial forces in Uruz­gan Province.

JIM MIDDLETON: You were at the ASEAN-Plus Defence Min­is­ters Meet­ing in Hanoi not so many weeks ago. The Com­mu­niqué there empha­sised mar­itime secu­ri­ty, as indeed have Barack Oba­ma, Hillary Clin­ton, and Robert Gates through­out the peri­od since then. Will China’s will­ing­ness to accept a nego­ti­at­ed set­tle­ment on its ter­ri­to­r­i­al claims in the South Chi­na Sea be a test of Beijing’s will­ing­ness to use its grow­ing pow­er peace­ful­ly in the best inter­ests of all nations in the region?

STEPHEN SMITH: Well a num­ber of points there. First­ly the meet­ing of the ASEAN-Plus Defence Min­is­ters saw in the same room at the same time the Defence Min­is­ters who will make up the expand­ed or extend­ed East Asia Sum­mit. So the East Asia Sum­mit plus effec­tive­ly the Unit­ed States and Rus­sia. That’s a very good thing because it enables all of the key coun­tries in the Asia Pacif­ic to have that con­ver­sa­tion about defence, mil­i­tary and secu­ri­ty issues.

A very impor­tant part of those talks were the mar­itime issues and Aus­tralia togeth­er with Malaysia has agreed to co-chair an Expert Work­ing Group on mar­itime issues. It’s very impor­tant to Aus­tralia. We’re an island con­ti­nent, an island coun­try, and use of sea lanes — inter­na­tion­al sea lanes, con­sis­tent­ly with inter­na­tion­al law and prac­tice, is very impor­tant to us.

The South Chi­na Sea and oth­er areas are the sub­ject of ter­ri­to­r­i­al dis­putes and they involve coun­tries, a range of coun­tries, not just Chi­na. Australia’s posi­tion is quite clear. We think it’s impor­tant that those ter­ri­to­r­i­al dis­putes be resolved amongst the par­ties con­cerned, be resolved ami­ca­bly and be resolved con­sis­tent­ly with inter­na­tion­al law and the Law of the Sea. And, as I said to the Defence Min­is­ters Meet­ing in Hanoi, we believe that the draft Code of Con­duct which ASEAN adopt­ed at the begin­ning of this Cen­tu­ry, 2002 from mem­o­ry, is a very good start­ing point. We are con­fi­dent as we’ve said con­tin­u­al­ly that Chi­na as it emerges — as it grows into a super pow­er — will emerge as a pos­i­tive force.

JIM MIDDLETON: What do you make then of the point being made by emi­nent Aus­tralian strate­gist Paul Dibb that the recent con­fronta­tion with Japan shows that Chi­na is throw­ing its weight around too much, that it’s not long he says before Chi­na needs to be taught a les­son mil­i­tar­i­ly?

STEPHEN SMITH: Well we don’t talk in those terms. Yes there have been ter­ri­to­r­i­al issues or mar­itime issues, not just in the South Chi­na Sea but in the East Chi­na Sea and from time to time these issues, these dis­putes can cause ten­sion or con­cern in the region. That’s why Aus­tralia is very strong­ly of the view that these issues need to be resolved not just ami­ca­bly amongst the par­ties con­cerned — and often there are more than two par­ties to the issue or the dis­pute — but they also need to be resolved con­sis­tent­ly with inter­na­tion­al law.

And from time to time it will be appro­pri­ate for these issues to be seized by a region­al forum such as the East Asia Sum­mit or the ASEAN Defence Min­is­ters Plus. We see that as play­ing poten­tial­ly a valu­able role and why we were pleased to co-chair the Mar­itime Expert Work­ing Group. But in all of these issues, as Chi­na emerges, we want Chi­na to not just have a pos­i­tive and pro­duc­tive rela­tion­ship with Aus­tralia as it does, we want Chi­na to have a pos­i­tive and pro­duc­tive rela­tion­ship with all the coun­tries in the region. And in the East Asia Sum­mit meet­ing at For­eign Min­is­ters lev­el ear­li­er this year in July-August, a range of ASEAN coun­tries made the point very strong­ly that they want­ed these issues to be resolved in the man­ner which I have out­lined.

JIM MIDDLETON: Defence Min­is­ter, thank you very much.

STEPHEN SMITH: Thank Jim, thanks very much.

Press release
Min­is­te­r­i­al Sup­port and Pub­lic Affairs,
Depart­ment of Defence,
Can­ber­ra, Aus­tralia

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twit­ter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →