Army Warfighters Go Digital to Hone Skills

WASHINGTON, May 10, 2011 — With more than 1 mil­lion ser­vice mem­bers on active duty in the Unit­ed States, the mil­i­tary ser­vices, and espe­cial­ly the Army, are run­ning short of a crit­i­cal com­mod­i­ty — train­ing grounds.
The prob­lem, inten­si­fied by the wind­ing down of two wars, is ratch­et­ing up the inter­est of Army senior lead­ers in vir­tu­al solu­tions to real-world con­straints.

U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command
Army Gen. Mar­tin E. Dempsey, then com­mand­ing gen­er­al of the U.S. Army Train­ing and Doc­trine Com­mand, now the Army’s chief of staff, dis­cuss­es the capa­bil­i­ties of remote train­ing with Kei­th John­ston at the Feb­ru­ary 2011 Win­ter Asso­ci­a­tion of the U.S. Army Expo­si­tion in Fort Laud­erdale, Fla.
U.S. Army pho­to by Sgt. Angel­i­ca Golin­dano
Click to enlarge

“We have a lot of sol­diers com­ing home to sta­tions here in the Unit­ed States, and … we don’t have enough ter­rain in many of those places to train those sol­diers out on live ranges,” Army Col. Antho­ny D. Krogh told Amer­i­can Forces Press Service. 

Krogh is direc­tor of the Nation­al Sim­u­la­tion Cen­ter, part of the Com­bined Arms Cen­ter at Fort Leav­en­worth, Kan. “We just phys­i­cal­ly can’t do it,” he said. “Fort Lewis is a good exam­ple.” Sev­en 5,000-person brigades are on the ground at Fort Lewis, now part of Joint Base Lewis-McChord in the state of Wash­ing­ton , he said. “But here’s the thing — there’s only enough maneu­ver space and range for one brigade there at a time,” he added. 

That means “our per­ish­able skills as sol­diers start to atro­phy rather rapid­ly,” the colonel said. “The only way we can make up for that is to use a syn­thet­ic, or vir­tu­al, world.” Krogh says Army com­mand and con­trol sys­tems them­selves pro­duce a kind of syn­thet­ic envi­ron­ment that has been in use for a long time. Force XXI Bat­tle Com­mand Brigade and Below, called FBCB2, for exam­ple, is a com­put­er-based com­mu­ni­ca­tion plat­form for commanders. 

Blue Force Track­ing is a GPS-enabled sys­tem that gives mil­i­tary com­man­ders and forces loca­tion infor­ma­tion about friend­ly and hos­tile forces. Oth­er com­mand-and-con­trol visu­al­iza­tion tools let com­man­ders see a three-dimen­sion­al bat­tle space and locate units or par­tic­u­lar sol­diers there, the colonel said. 

“It does­n’t look like an avatar,” Krogh said, refer­ring to dig­i­tal rep­re­sen­ta­tions of users that pop­u­late vir­tu­al worlds, “but it is a syn­thet­ic envi­ron­ment that’s cre­at­ed because we learn or under­stand quick­er through visu­al­iza­tion than any­thing else.” 

The Army also uses sim­u­la­tors of all kinds to train sol­diers at dif­fer­ent lev­els, he said, from squad and fire-team lead­ers and indi­vid­ual sol­diers to divi­sion and core com­man­ders. Emerg­ing-tech­nol­o­gy Army ini­tia­tives include a Train­ing and Doc­trine Com­mand effort called the Train­ing Brain. This com­bines capa­bil­i­ties, sys­tems, net­works and data into a sys­tem that uses mod­el­ing, sim­u­la­tion and gam­ing to repli­cate real-world events for use in training. 

With­in about four days the Train­ing Brain sys­tem can turn a fire­fight or a mis­sion into a sim­u­la­tion game, the command’s web­site says. “In terms of vir­tu­al worlds, our pri­ma­ry focus is on Vir­tu­al Bat­tle­space 2, the VBS2 game,” Krogh said. “Gam­ing ini­tial­ly got a bad rap, because a lot of us had teenagers who were play­ing Xbox and Nin­ten­do instead of doing their home­work. For­tu­nate­ly, we as lead­ers grew into this and rec­og­nized the value.” 

VBS2 has been par­tic­u­lar­ly suc­cess­ful, he said. “Arguably, it’s one of the most suc­cess­ful sim­u­la­tions we’ve ever brought to the force,” he added. “In terms of cost ver­sus usage, it’s a huge success.” 

Prague-based Bohemia Inter­ac­tive Stu­dio devel­oped the gam­ing and train­ing plat­form in coop­er­a­tion with the Marine Corps, the Aus­tralian Defense Force and oth­er mil­i­tary cus­tomers. It includes a vir­tu­al bat­tle­field on which users can oper­ate land, sea and air vehi­cles. Lots of peo­ple can play the game at once in vir­tu­al com­plex urban areas that include build­ings that play­ers can destroy, and real­is­tic work­ing weapons. 

An after-action-review mod­ule, called AAR, records every play­er action, bul­let path, explo­sion and vehi­cle move­ment for a detailed exam­i­na­tion of the train­ing mis­sion. “The most impor­tant thing in any of these syn­thet­ic envi­ron­ments is to have focused train­ing and the abil­i­ty to con­duct an AAR cri­tique [to under­stand] what you did right and what you need to work on,” Krogh said. 

VBS2 and oth­er ini­tia­tives have helped Army senior lead­er­ship under­stand the val­ue of vir­tu­al train­ing. Now, Krogh said, the Army is look­ing to expand the use of vir­tu­al worlds, not­ing that vir­tu­al real­i­ty will allow an entire brigade to train at one time next year at Fort Bliss, Texas. “Only one bat­tal­ion will phys­i­cal­ly maneu­ver on real dirt,” he explained. “The rest of the brigade will either be in vir­tu­al flight or tank sim­u­la­tors or in their com­mand posts through what we call con­struc­tive sim­u­la­tion. So [it will fea­ture] a lot of dig­i­tal dirt, and a lit­tle bit of real dirt.” 

Fur­ther into the future, Krogh said, the Army is explor­ing the util­i­ty of “mas­sive­ly mul­ti­play­er” online gam­ing tech­nol­o­gy, like that used in World of War­craft. “These have been in the com­mer­cial world for­ev­er, but we’re look­ing to lever­age that for train­ing our sol­diers around the clock, around the world, where they can always jump onto that syn­thet­ic envi­ron­ment and train,” he said. 

The Army is bring­ing a new sys­tem online that tracks phys­i­cal train­ing scores, weapons qual­i­fi­ca­tion lev­els and scores for oth­er ser­vice skills for indi­vid­u­als in the real world and links them to that person’s avatar in the Army’s vir­tu­al envi­ron­ment, he added. 

“Pic­ture this,” Krogh said. “If I don’t do well on a PT test, my avatar will not run as fast or move as quick or sus­tain in com­bat as long as anoth­er sol­dier who has a bet­ter PT score in the real world.” 

The same thing will hap­pen for oth­ers skills, he said. “If I am out of tol­er­ance for my weapons train­ing or I have only shot marks­man as opposed to sharp­shoot­er or expert, then my PH/PK — prob­a­bil­i­ty of hit/probability of kill — in the sim­u­la­tion goes way down, because I’m not as high­ly skilled in the real world.” 

Train­ing in the vir­tu­al world would mir­ror train­ing in the real world, the colonel said. Prac­tice with firearms online “would help you pre­pare so that when you went to the real range, you’d have had that con­tin­u­ous expe­ri­ence of engag­ing the tar­gets and putting the weapon into ser­vice,” he said. 

Sol­diers could­n’t do phys­i­cal train­ing online, but in see­ing where they stand in rela­tion to their peers, Krogh said, “a sol­dier would real­ize, ‘I’ve got to lose some weight and do bet­ter on the PT test, because when I go online my squad is always leav­ing me behind.’ ” Despite progress the Army is just get­ting start­ed, Krogh said. 

“I would say with­in the next two years we’ll be able to put many of these capa­bil­i­ties in place,” he said. 

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twitter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →