Army one step closer to replacement of ACU pattern

WASHINGTON — The Army is now one step clos­er to select­ing a new set of cam­ou­flage pat­terns that could replace what Sol­diers are wear­ing now in most places.

 -
A Solid­er wear­ing the Oper­a­tion Endur­ing Free­dom Cam­ou­flage Pat­tern, or OCP, uses an M14 Enhanced Bat­tle Rifle. The OCP pat­tern was devel­oped to help Sol­diers blend in bet­ter in Afghanistan. Now, the Army is devel­op­ing a new set of uni­form pat­terns for all Sol­diers, as part of the Phase IV cam­ou­flage effort.
Click to enlarge

As part of the “Phase IV” cam­ou­flage effort, the Army this week award­ed con­tracts to five ven­dors — select­ed from an ini­tial 20 — to each pro­vide enough fab­ric in the new cam­ou­flage pat­terns they have devel­oped to pro­duce 150 uni­forms for the Army to test.

Each ven­dor had been asked to pro­duce a “fam­i­ly of cam­ou­flage pat­terns,” includ­ing one that would be suit­able in a wood­land envi­ron­ment, one that would be suit­able in a desert envi­ron­ment, and one that would work in a “tran­si­tion­al” envi­ron­ment.

The Army will spend the next nine months test­ing the effec­tive­ness of those pat­terns.

“To real­ly have con­fi­dence in being able to make a rec­om­men­da­tion to senior lead­ers, we need to do field tri­als,” said Col. William Cole, of Pro­gram Exec­u­tive Office Sol­dier. “We are look­ing for­ward to get­ting out into the woods, into the deserts, into the tran­si­tion­al areas and hav­ing real Sol­diers wear these uni­forms and have real Sol­diers observe them.”

Cole said the Army will use both real-world test­ing in vary­ing ter­rains and con­di­tions, as well as more advanced com­put­er test­ing to eval­u­ate the pat­terns.

“We’re going to put them through the ringer,” he said.

Due to the vary­ing types of ter­rain Sol­diers oper­ate in, Cole said the Army had found that “we can’t real­ly have one pat­tern that is as effec­tive as we’d like in every sin­gle ter­rain type.”

Today, most Sol­diers wear the Army Com­bat Uni­form. The ACU bears the Uni­ver­sal Cam­ou­flage Pat­tern, the famil­iar grey/blue “dig­i­tal” pat­tern. In Afghanistan, Sol­diers also have the Oper­a­tion Endur­ing Free­dom Cam­ou­flage Pat­tern, or OCP, avail­able for wear.

The ven­dors each devel­oped three pat­terns with the same geom­e­try — the shapes on the fab­ric — but with dif­fer­ent col­or palettes. Addi­tion­al­ly, the ven­dors were to devel­op a fourth “coor­di­nat­ed” pat­tern, or name one of the three already in their fam­i­ly of pat­terns, that would work well with all three pat­terns. That fourth pat­tern is for use on orga­ni­za­tion­al cloth­ing and indi­vid­ual equip­ment, or OCIE.

Cole said that OCIE, things like belts, pro­tec­tive vests, ruck sacks and plate car­ri­ers, are more expen­sive than a Soldier’s reg­u­lar uni­form. The Army does­n’t want to main­tain OCIE in each of the three pat­terns, so instead the Army will have it in one pat­tern that looks good with all three of the uni­form pat­tern vari­ants.

Cole said oth­er orga­ni­za­tions have OCIE that is a sol­id col­or, but he said “we were hop­ing we could do bet­ter than that,” and the Army asked indus­try to come up with an OCIE pat­tern to break up sol­id col­or “and still look good on all three uni­form pat­terns.”

“We had seen some exam­ples of gross­ly mis­matched OCIE in uni­forms in the ear­ly part of Iraqi Free­dom — we did­n’t want to have any tell­tale signs of where the OCIE, the vest and armor stopped and where the rest of the body began,” Cole said.

Many ven­dors have cho­sen their “tran­si­tion­al” pat­tern for use on the OCIE, Cole said.

Each of the five ven­dors will now pro­duce enough fab­ric to build 50 uni­forms out of each of their three sub­mit­ted pat­terns — for a total of 150 uni­forms from each com­pa­ny. In all, the Army will have 750 uni­forms for use in its test­ing.

Cole said by Octo­ber, PEO Sol­dier will have com­plet­ed test­ing of the pat­terns and will be able to make rec­om­men­da­tions to Army senior lead­er­ship about the way ahead.

“There’s a lot to do between now and Octo­ber, but that’s our plan,” Cole said. “Com­plete the field tri­als and com­plete the more sen­si­tive com­put­er sim­u­la­tions and come back to senior lead­ers in Octo­ber and lay out the results of what we found and have a rec­om­men­da­tion.”

The five ven­dors award­ed con­tracts include:

  • Atlantic Div­ing Sup­ply, Inc., Vir­ginia Beach, Va.
  • Brook­wood Com­pa­nies Inc., New York, N.Y.
  • Crye Pre­ci­sion, LLC, Brook­lyn, N.Y.
  • Kryptek Inc., Fair­banks, Alas­ka
  • U.S. Army Nat­ick Sol­dier Research, Devel­op­ment and Engi­neer­ing Cen­ter, Nat­ick, Mass.

Source:
U.S. Army

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twit­ter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →