Afghanistan — Report Notes Afghanistan Developments, Challenges

WASHINGTON, April 28, 2010 — Sta­bil­i­ty in Afghanistan is no longer on the decline, and most Afghans believe that despite increased vio­lence, secu­ri­ty actu­al­ly has improved since this time last year, accord­ing to a new report Pen­ta­gon offi­cials sent to Con­gress today.

The con­gres­sion­al­ly man­dat­ed Report on Progress Toward Secu­ri­ty and Sta­bil­i­ty in Afghanistan attrib­ut­es the 87 per­cent increase in vio­lence from Feb­ru­ary 2009 to March 2010 large­ly to increased U.S., coali­tion and Afghan nation­al secu­ri­ty force activ­i­ty, par­tic­u­lar­ly into areas where they pre­vi­ous­ly had not oper­at­ed.

The report, which cov­ers the sit­u­a­tion on the ground from Oct. 1 to March 31, cites progress in Pres­i­dent Barack Obama’s strat­e­gy aimed at dis­rupt­ing, dis­man­tling and defeat­ing al-Qai­da in Afghanistan and Pak­istan. But it offers what a senior defense offi­cial speak­ing on b ack­ground called a sober­ing assess­ment of the con­di­tions on the ground, and a recog­ni­tion of the impor­tance of what hap­pens with­in the next six months in deter­min­ing the direc­tion the oper­a­tion ulti­mate­ly will take.

Despite increased vio­lence, the report notes that the down­ward trend in sta­bil­i­ty appears to have stemmed, along with Tal­iban momen­tum. But it’s far too soon to say the cor­ner has been turned, the offi­cial told reporters.

“We are on the cusp,” he said. “We are no longer mov­ing in the wrong direc­tion.” He cit­ed signs that he said indi­cate “we are mov­ing in the right direc­tion.”

U.S., coali­tion and Afghan forces activ­i­ty has played a major role in chang­ing that dynam­ic as they extend their reach into more Afghanistan dis­tricts, the offi­cial said. He expressed hope that their pop­u­la­tion-cen­tric tac­tics will help to sway more Afghans toward sup­port­ing the demo­c­ra­t­i­cal­ly elect­ed Afghan gov­ern­ment. That, in turn, could serve as a ful­crum that could “change the dynam­ic of the whole coun­try,” he added.

As of March 31, about 87,000 U.S. forces were on the ground in Afghanistan, with addi­tion­al forces to bring that num­ber to 98,000 by August. In addi­tion, 46,500 inter­na­tion­al forces are serv­ing in Afghanistan, with 38 coun­tries pledg­ing about 9,000 more troops to sup­port oper­a­tions, tac­tics and train­ing. As of March 31, 40 per­cent of those addi­tion­al troops had arrived in the coun­try.

The report cites require­ments that inter­na­tion­al part­ners have not filled – pri­mar­i­ly for train­ers and men­tors to sup­port devel­op­ment of Afghan secu­ri­ty forces, par­tic­u­lar­ly the police force, which lags behind the Afghan army.

The defense offi­cial cit­ed addi­tion­al inter­na­tion­al troop com­mit­ments since the report closed March 31, includ­ing 20 to 30 per­cent more insti­tu­tion­al train­ers.

But while NATO allies and part­ners are “cau­tious­ly opti­mistic” about suc­cess of the Inter­na­tion­al Secu­ri­ty Assis­tance Force mis­sion, many nation­al lead­ers express con­cerns about dwin­dling pop­u­lar sup­port for the mis­sion with­in their coun­tries, the report not­ed.

As of March 31, the Afghans had field­ed about 113,000 army troops and 102,000 nation­al police offi­cers. They are broad­ly on track to meet tar­get­ed growth fig­ures of 134,000 for the army and 109,000 for the police by Octo­ber, the report said, and 171,600 sol­diers and 134,000 police offi­cers by Octo­ber 2011.

Anoth­er report the Defense Depart­ment sent Con­gress today — the U.S. Plan for Sus­tain­ing the Afghanistan Nation­al Secu­ri­ty Forces — cites con­tin­ued improve­ments in build­ing capac­i­ty as well as end strength in these forces. It notes new ini­tia­tives dur­ing the past year designed to speed up this process, includ­ing orga­ni­za­tion­al changes to the NATO com­mand struc­ture to improve uni­ty of com­mand and embed­ding inter­na­tion­al forces with Afghan secu­ri­ty forces at all lev­els to pro­mote men­tor­ship and lead­er­ship devel­op­ment.

The report rec­og­nizes that for Afghan forces to be pre­pared to take the secu­ri­ty lead, oth­er ele­ments also must be in place — gov­er­nance, courts, judges, pros­e­cu­tors and cor­rec­tion­al capac­i­ty, among them.

The Afghanistan secu­ri­ty and sta­bil­i­ty report also acknowl­edges that Obama’s Afghanistan strat­e­gy requires increased civil­ian as well as mil­i­tary capac­i­ty. The State Depart­ment has tripled its civil­ians on the ground since Jan­u­ary 2009, to 339, to sup­port the gov­er­nance and devel­op­ment goals in Afghanistan that are crit­i­cal to sus­tain­ing improve­ments in the secu­ri­ty sit­u­a­tion, the report said.

“It’s not all about secu­ri­ty,” the defense offi­cial told reporters. “It’s about what secu­ri­ty enables.”

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →