Afghanistan — Petraeus Discusses Pros, Cons of July 2011 Deadline

WASHINGTON, June 29, 2010 — Sen­a­tors ques­tioned Army Gen. David H. Petraeus repeat­ed­ly on his under­stand­ing of the July 2011 tar­get date to begin pulling U.S. troops out of Afghanistan dur­ing tes­ti­mo­ny before the Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee today.

Pres­i­dent Oba­ma has nom­i­nat­ed Petraeus – the com­man­der of U.S. Cen­tral Com­mand – to be com­man­der of U.S. and NATO forces. The com­mit­tee passed its rec­om­men­da­tion for con­fir­ma­tion to the full Sen­ate after the hear­ing. The general’s nom­i­na­tion for the NATO post must go through NATO chan­nels.

When Pres­i­dent Barack Oba­ma laid out the new strat­e­gy in Afghanistan dur­ing a speech at the U.S. Mil­i­tary Acad­e­my in Decem­ber, he said that he would add 30,000 Amer­i­can troops to the mix, but that U.S. forces would begin return­ing to the Unit­ed States in July 2011 if con­di­tions on the ground allow. Petraeus told the sen­a­tors that he sup­port­ed and agrees with the president’s strat­e­gy.

U.S. forces in Afghanistan would “begin a process in July 2011 under which tasks are trans­ferred to Afghan secu­ri­ty forces and gov­ern­ment offi­cials and a ‘respon­si­ble draw­down’ of the surge forces begins, pace to be deter­mined by con­di­tions,” he said.

Amer­i­can forces in Afghanistan are relent­less­ly pur­su­ing the Tal­iban and their al-Qai­da allies, and com­man­ders and polit­i­cal lead­ers must con­sid­er con­di­tions on the ground before a draw­down begins, the gen­er­al said.

Still, he added, the dead­line does make sense.

“On the one hand, pro­duc­tiv­i­ty experts say that there’s no greater pro­duc­tiv­i­ty tool than a dead­line,” Petraeus said. “The mes­sage of urgency that the dead­line con­veyed … was not just for domes­tic polit­i­cal pur­pos­es. It was for audi­ences in [the Afghan cap­i­tal of] Kab­ul, who … need­ed to be remind­ed that we won’t be there for­ev­er. But we will be there, and pre­sum­ably for quite some time.”

The dead­line tells the Afghans that they need to move for­ward smart­ly on poli­cies and pro­ce­dures to effect change, Petraeus said. “I think it did actu­al­ly gal­va­nize some degree of action,” he told the com­mit­tee. “There may have been some mes­sage for some of us in uni­form that we need­ed to get on with it. The truth is that ear­ly on in the process, we were look­ing at a more delib­er­ate cam­paign. We com­pressed that, get­ting the troops on the ground much more rapid­ly than was orig­i­nal­ly even thought pos­si­ble.”

But a dead­line also can give ene­mies the impres­sion they sim­ply can wait it out, the gen­er­al not­ed.

“You have to make sure that the ene­my does not inter­pret that as that moment where­as it was said the Unit­ed States is head­ing for the exits, look­ing for the light switch to turn it off because we’re out of here, because that is not accu­rate, at least not in my per­cep­tion,” Petraeus said.

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →